To what extent did the Conservatives lose the election rather than the Liberals win the election? "The election of 1906 was a significant watershed in the political history of Britain" Kenneth Owen Fox

Authors Avatar
Tom Gatenby

To what extent did the Conservatives lose the election rather than the Liberals win the election?

"The election of 1906 was a significant watershed in the political history of Britain" Kenneth Owen Fox

The election of 1906 was a landside victory for the Liberal Party. This is due to many factors, it could been influenced by the manifesto of the Liberal Party, or perhaps even more strongly the failure of the Conservative Party to unify on such reforms as the Tariff Reform. The lack of a strong unified Conservative government clearly had a large effect upon the outcome of the 1906 election, to what extent this is true will be explained in the essay.

In the 1906 election, the number of seats won by Liberals increased from 184 to 377, in contrast the numbers of seats lost by the Conservatives went from 402 seats won in 1900 to 157 seats lost in the 1906 election, this represented the lowest number of seats held by a Conservative government since 1832. This dramatic reversal of constituencies held, is due to a number of reasons. An argument is that, due to some poor decisions made by the Conservative governments, they in fact contributed largely to the landslide result in the 1906 election. 'They were in effect the architects to the own downfall.' William Palmer

Taff Vale was an important example of the Conservatives failure of judgement; this was to have disastrous results in regards to the popularity of their Party. The 'Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants' a trade union, because of their strike action was ordered to pay to the Taff Vale railway company a sum of £23,000. This enormous sum of money effectively crushed the union. This effectively destroyed the whole union movement as now they could no longer strike, and as such had no real power. This verdict reached by the House of Lords was obviously very damaging to trade unions around the country. Balfour now had the option to reverse the decision, and yet he did not take this action but instead he set up a Royal Commission to investigate the whole position of the trade unions. This decision was obviously very unpopular with the trade unions, and gave them the impression that Balfour's government did not care about them. As a result this was extremely unpopular with the working class, as trade unions were the only way the working classes could be represented at this time. It also appeared to the working classes that Balfour did not care about their plight. And was very unsympathetic towards their whole cause. At this point Balfour had effectively lost the potential working class vote and in so doing so had given rise to the Labour Party movement.
Join now!


Part of the Liberals manifesto in 1906 was the verdict of Taff Vale was to be reversed. This obviously suggested to the working classes that the Liberal Party did care and that they understood the working class plight. At this some of the working classes pledged support to the Liberal Party, thereby boosting the Liberal Party votes. This is an example of the Liberal Party taking political advantage of a mistake made by Balfour's government to benefit the Liberal Party in the 1906 election.

Another reason perhaps that the Liberal Party won such a landside victory ...

This is a preview of the whole essay