• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and communist rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and communist rule? Hannah Roberts - Jones 13eld. There were many changes of agricultural policies under the Tsarist and communist rules of which all had different results and reactions. Stolypin's land law as stated in source 2 was produced 40 years after emancipation displaying that the policies made after emancipation were not successful as they were still being altered 40 years on. This supports the idea that government's policies on agriculture consistently failed. Source 1 supports this as it states that the peasants were still tied to the land after the emancipation highlighting the failure of the policies. Many of the sources state that the government policies before were a failure. Source 3 for example, states that collective farms were necessary as the policies before failed. ...read more.

Middle

There is some evidence that it wasn't the actual policies that failed, as source 4 states that it was the "stupid decisions" and the bad planning that clouded the success of the policies and made them fail. Source 4 was written after the fall of communism in 1991 were rapid changes were taking place. The blaming on planning could have been a way to protect the communist ideology and blame the planners. This source although gives the idea of success the context of the source gives reason to be sceptical on how far it was the planning that was the failure. This source however does give the idea that there were successes but the bad planning hid them. Source 2 supports this idea as Stolypin had a long term plan for agriculture as part a states that he wanted to strengthen the peasants with the ability to go further. ...read more.

Conclusion

In many of the sources there is blatant mention of the peasant resistance such as source 2 by stating that the peasants were very hostile to Stolypin's laws. This source however, was written by a tsarist official and does not give any more information about him such as what position he held. This could make the evidence biased as he could have been more conservative and didn't like Stolypin's radical ideas. The same source but part c shows that not all peasants resisted and that there were some that saw the benefits of policies. These sources do display however, the difference in the peasant's resistance as some peasants actively participated as source 4 states about the activists. There were some peasants such as the Bedniaks that benefited from being released from taxes and also got admission into schools. However, this also created more resistance amongst the peasants, as they were not seeing these benefits. This clearly shows that it depends on what category of peasant that you fell into to determine the level of your resistance. Word count - 769 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Comparing the German and Russian systems of government

    The new constitution increased the president's power and lessened those of the new parliament thus making it a presidential system of government. In Russia's case it is the State Duma that is similar to Germany's Bundestag and it takes precedence over the Federation Council.

  2. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    What the Sharpeville massacre made clear was that the government, deeply entrenched in racist attitudes, would not tolerate opposition and protest from black groups such as the ANC and PAC.

  1. Economic Changes after the 1949 Communist Revolution in China

    In total 10,000 soviet Scientists, engineers and other experts were sent to help in 694 important industrial projects. Many Chinese students were sent over to Russia for training. For the purpose of economic planning, the first modern census was taken in 1953; the population of Mainland China was shown to

  2. Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what ...

    A further contribution to the Protectorate from Cromwell were the Four Fundamentals in January 1654, where Cromwell personally defined what the constitution should rest on; government to be led by a single person and Parliament, Parliament would not be permanent but meet regularly, there should be liberty of conscience and

  1. To what extent did Alexander II succeed in reforming Russian life and institutions?

    These factors connected together brought a wave of general dissatisfaction and disillusion amongst the peasant community concerning that they were supposed to be free and not tied to the communes or having to pay high taxes of redemption. As a result of that, there were many riots and rebellions of

  2. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    her of her special and individual personality and had made of her nothing but a pale imitation of a Western State. The feature which most impressed the Slavophils was the Orthodox Church. They freely admitted that, in their own time, their Church had fallen on evil days.

  1. Critically examine how Mahatma Gandhi used the concept of non-violence as a practical tool ...

    financial crises propelled the Raj to introduce more local government institutions in order to increase revenue by increasing the tax base (Allen 1992). This decision had important consequences. More taxation meant more representation. It also meant in this case the opening of political office to elections (although on a limited franchise).

  2. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    While governments fell in Europe in 1884, the governing class of Britain was confident and tightly-knit enough to control the Chartists, with the same few families holding leading positions in the government, the church and the army. This fact meant that the strength and organisation of troops prevented any real

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work