• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and communist rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and communist rule? Hannah Roberts - Jones 13eld. There were many changes of agricultural policies under the Tsarist and communist rules of which all had different results and reactions. Stolypin's land law as stated in source 2 was produced 40 years after emancipation displaying that the policies made after emancipation were not successful as they were still being altered 40 years on. This supports the idea that government's policies on agriculture consistently failed. Source 1 supports this as it states that the peasants were still tied to the land after the emancipation highlighting the failure of the policies. Many of the sources state that the government policies before were a failure. Source 3 for example, states that collective farms were necessary as the policies before failed. ...read more.

Middle

There is some evidence that it wasn't the actual policies that failed, as source 4 states that it was the "stupid decisions" and the bad planning that clouded the success of the policies and made them fail. Source 4 was written after the fall of communism in 1991 were rapid changes were taking place. The blaming on planning could have been a way to protect the communist ideology and blame the planners. This source although gives the idea of success the context of the source gives reason to be sceptical on how far it was the planning that was the failure. This source however does give the idea that there were successes but the bad planning hid them. Source 2 supports this idea as Stolypin had a long term plan for agriculture as part a states that he wanted to strengthen the peasants with the ability to go further. ...read more.

Conclusion

In many of the sources there is blatant mention of the peasant resistance such as source 2 by stating that the peasants were very hostile to Stolypin's laws. This source however, was written by a tsarist official and does not give any more information about him such as what position he held. This could make the evidence biased as he could have been more conservative and didn't like Stolypin's radical ideas. The same source but part c shows that not all peasants resisted and that there were some that saw the benefits of policies. These sources do display however, the difference in the peasant's resistance as some peasants actively participated as source 4 states about the activists. There were some peasants such as the Bedniaks that benefited from being released from taxes and also got admission into schools. However, this also created more resistance amongst the peasants, as they were not seeing these benefits. This clearly shows that it depends on what category of peasant that you fell into to determine the level of your resistance. Word count - 769 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Comparing the German and Russian systems of government

    Power in Russia is basically divided between the parliament and the president. While in Germany the chancellor leads a cabinet of ministers and the president serves as a ceremonial head of state. The German system of Government is often called a "Kanzlerdemokratie" (a Chancellor's Democracy).

  2. The ending of White minority rule was achieved solely by Nelson Mandela. Do you ...

    A state of emergency was introduced in 1985 and over the years the sanctions were in place, it cost the South African government millions of Rand. Even though the South Africa government lost millions due to the sanctions, they only lost a fraction of their wealth.

  1. Economic Changes after the 1949 Communist Revolution in China

    Other regulations provided for equal pay and maternity benefits, and for childcare at the workplace, to enable women to work outside the home. The overall aim of these changes was to break the power of the traditional male-dominated family, which had kept women in helplessness.

  2. The Drug Policy in the United States

    They believe that the corruption needs to end and that if the U.S. simply legalized these drugs so much of this corruption would cease to exist. I, like everyone else in this great country, have formed an opinion on the topic at hand.

  1. Using the evidence of Sources 2, 3 and 5, and your own knowledge explain ...

    Cromwell whole heartedly believed in the "Providence of God" and at times put 'healing and settling' aside in order to carry out 'godly reformation'. Therefore, even though Cromwell wanted to create a stable and lasting settlement he was not able to consistently carry out this aim but was compromised with

  2. To what extent did Alexander II succeed in reforming Russian life and institutions?

    peasants: in 1861 the Ministry of the Interior reported 1159 riots, which was a high number. In addition, neither the landlords were happy as for them the emancipation was too much nor the radicals because for them the tsar did not go far enough.

  1. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    By creating a 'German bureaucracy' he had diverted Russia from her true destiny. He had torn her away from her cultural roots and, by making her a rational utilitarian State (untilitarianism: doctine that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be sole end of public action), he had deprived

  2. Which features of Russian society were likely to cause problems for the Tsarist government ...

    Marx predicted that the industrial workers in each country would rise against the middle and upper classes and seize control of the means of production. Eventually a classless society would be created. This theory is known as communism. The communists saw Nicholas II, the aristocracy and the Church as the controllers and the oppressors of the Russian people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work