Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree with George Dangerfield’s view that “by the end of 1913, Liberal England was reduced to ashes”?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do you agree with George Dangerfield's view that "by the end of 1913, Liberal England was reduced to ashes"? Dangerfield, author of 'Strange death of Liberal England', sees the years leading to the outbreak of war in 1914 as problematic for the Liberals to say the least. Following their remarkable victory in the 1906 election, the Liberals formed "arguably the most brilliant and constructive government of the twentieth century" (Adelman, 'Decline of the Liberal Party 1910-1931'). Yet they were plagued with problems throughout the period of 1906 to the outbreak of war. During the pre war period the Liberals faced many problems and their support was badly damaged in the period, highlighted in the 1910 election results. The constitutional crisis, challenges from Labour and with it industrial militancy, Ireland, the Suffragette movement, internal difficulties - Asquith's leadership and problems within the cabinet - were all problems the Liberals had to face. All these factors contributed to the growing pressure on the shoulders of the Liberal government, Dangerfield takes the view that the Liberal government to all intents and purposes cracked under the pressure and by the end of 1913 all that they had fought so hard to achieve in the latter stages of the nineteenth century had been reduced to ashes and the flame of British Liberalism had been extinguished, never to burn in all its incandescent glory again. ...read more.

Middle

In essence I see the Labour challenge as less significant as the problems that arose due to the Liberal's policy of letting the situation correct itself. The amount of support for Trade Unions and the industrial militancy that plagued the country by the war clearly showed the Liberals were not in control of the situation and can be used as one of the factors to justify Dangerfield's view that Liberal England was in ashes by the end of 1913. It could be seen as inevitable that increasing working class consciousness would lead to Labour gaining power, but Dangerfield underestimated the problems facing Labour and also the strength of their challenge as I believe they themselves had lost touch with working class problems; Carl Brand says that by the end of 1914 the "Labour Party was dependant upon the Liberals, dissatisfied with its achievements, unsure of its aims, and apparently in decline". In 1912 The Liberal government introduced its Home Rule Bill, partly due to its commitment to the principle of granting Home Rule to Ireland and party due to its dependence on Irish Nationalists. This Bill was ferociously opposed by the Ulster Unionists who Asquith had failed to see how far they would be willing to oppose the Bill and the fact he was unable to see how divisions between Protestants and Catholics had grown. ...read more.

Conclusion

Personally I see the pre war period as turbulent to say the least, but they remained in government through three elections, passed groundbreaking reforms and were in power when the war began. The impact the war had on British politics was astronomical, it acted as the catalyst for the decline of the Liberals, something Dangerfield appears to ignore in his writings. The war effectively forced the Liberals to implode and split, thus making a future for a Liberal party impossible Suggesting it was the war that extinguished the flame of Liberalism and reduced Liberal England to ashes. In conclusion the Liberals did not have an easy time in government, but fought their battles valiantly, introducing social reform on the way. In the end the jackhammer blows that came with each ensuing challenge or problem toppled the white knight of Liberalism, yet I believe this was not in 1913, but during the war. The Liberals entered the war shaken, but still ready to fight, sending their trusty stead into the face of adversity, only for it to be defeated by internal problems rather than that of external issues, something I find profoundly ironic given the nature of the external turmoil the Liberals faced in the pre war years. ?? ?? ?? ?? Matt Jones History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    Parliament proposed that the British government buy stocks of grain and sell it in the worst famine areas, his response was simply no: " Purchase by government of any food in ordinary use is forbidden in order to avoid competition with private traders" Charles Trevelyan, Lord Russell's minister in charge

  2. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    world position, but they both became aware of the necessity to become part of that union once the British Empire had started to collapse in the 1960s. The two political parties disagreed on many policies, sometimes it was just a matter of emphasis, but on others the differences were more significant.

  1. J. S. Mill Despre Libertate

    si documente considerate eretice sau pe care laicii nu le puteau citi dec�t dupa obtinerea unei aprobari speciale foarte dificil de primit. Aceasta stare de fapte nu era prezenta si �n statele protestante, asa ca �n aceste locuri oricine avea acces la diversele scrieri, acest fapt influent�nd �ntr-o oarecare masura

  2. Free essay

    Consider the view that the liberal government reforms 1906-1914 were more concerned with the ...

    Britain was already twenty years passed talk off the bill and many other countries such as Germany and New Zealand had already taken up the idea. When the liberals came to office they were faced with increasing pressure not just from The Labour party (When made into a parliamentary strength

  1. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    Gono Adalat or public tribunal was seen as challenge to a legitimate state, and the charges of sedition were filed against Jahanara Imam and forty other leaders of the movement. Women's common experience across ethnic, class and community boundaries have often helped women in conflict situations to network with each

  2. COMBATING CORRUPTION IN BANGLADESH: SOME STRATEGIES

    Policy reforms in sectional service delivery * Decentralization with accountability In most cases greater public oversight can play a key role in the reform process. The practice of political patronage in public administration continues to be an important source of corruption in many development countries.

  1. TO WHAT EXTENT WERE LLOYD GEORGE'S OWN POLICIES, RATHER THAN HIS DEPENDENCE ON THE ...

    The failure of this scheme showed how he had little control over his one-time colleagues, and also proved that he had limited powers in persuading colleagues into merging into a 'Centre Party'. In May 1921 disaster struck for LG, Law resigned from cabinet and as leader of his party due to ill health.

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    From the commercial and military point of view Kiaochow is an important place, in the acquisition of which the Japanese Empire sacrificed much blood and money, and, after the acquisition the Empire incurs no obligation to restore it to China.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work