• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent have the Labour government's attempts to reform local government made it more democratic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent have the Labour government's attempts to reform local government made it more democratic? When considering what makes something more democratic then something else, a firm understanding of the word democracy is needed. The Collins English Dictionary defines democracy as, "1. A government for the people or their elected representatives. 2. A political or social unit governed ultimately by all its members." Democracy come from the Greek words - damos meaning 'the people' and cratos meaning 'power' - in other words it means 'people power'. However there are many different systems of government that would claim to be 'democratic'. So what democracy means in context to the English government is a government for the people by the people. Recent reforms in Local governments by the Labour Party have made it much more democratic. ...read more.

Middle

The local governments should not be seen as subsidiaries of the national government and local implementers of national policies but councils should belong to local people but the government. This might have led people to believe that there is not point in voting in local elections because they are of no relevance. This can be seen by the extremely low turnout usually below 40%. But not because local government is getting more power through the reforms, people are starting to realise that the local issues are important. By people voting and expressing their views it is decreasing democratic deficit thus making it more democratic. Another reason why the local government will be more democratic is the councils and councillors will become more accessible. This will increase accountability because people will become more confident in their local issues. ...read more.

Conclusion

Before, local councillors were people who wanted to do it and were not paid for working but the were for travelling expenses. This meant that about 36 hours of free time were needed a week too sufficiently to the job. This meant that the only people who wanted to be councillors were white, middle class men who supported the Conservative Party. This was not very democratic because it is not a good representation of the community. But the reforms have made this a full time job and the councillors and mayor have to be directly elected. This means that all people can become a councillor; black, white, male, and female. This is much more democratic. Overall the new reforms have made local governments much more democratic because the biggest addition to it is that it involves greater public participation which is what democracy is all about; a government for the people by the people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent does ministerial responsibility ensure accountability to the government?

    In practice these conventions have been much weakened. Cabinet divisions, especially under the Conservatives over Europe, the greater distancing of policy making from the full cabinet, and the increasing trend of political memoirs from former cabinet ministers revealing divisions has reduced the extent of collective responsibility a great deal.

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    Ladies not for turning.") and allows unemployment to rise to more than 2 and then 3 million. Also, a key difference between Consensus Conservatism and Thatcherism lies upon the view about the trade unions power. Whereas Consensus Conservatism brought unions into contact with government and gave them much power, Thatcherism

  1. How successful was the 1945-51 labour government.

    However, there were problems with this scheme. Benefit levels that had been agreed could not support people as much as they needed. This was due to the flat rate contribution system which kept the benefit level to that of the lowest paid.

  2. How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

    The same foreign policies were followed when dealing with colonial issues, however with less success. With domestic policies, in general, the Labour government failed. However it must be noted that there were some domestic reforms to Labour's credit. There was the reform of the unemployment insurance system, the introduction of

  1. To what extent was the 1867 Reform Act a turning point in parliamentary democracy ...

    Indeed Gladstone and Disraeli himself, found their way into the Commons (after four attempts in Disraelis case) through patronage. There was no secret ballot yet, but there would be in 5 years time. Would the Ballot Act have passed without the 1867 Act as a precedent?

  2. How significant is the influence which pressure groups have on government? Is there any ...

    Public policy has a part to play. "The level of group activity fluctuates in relation to shifts in public policy, particularly the degree to which the state intervenes in economic and social life". (Heywood, 2002, p 278-9). There is a range of ways that groups can exert their influence, to a greater or lesser extent, over government.

  1. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    Workers in the companies were offered cut price shares to encourage them to own part of the business this further removed the need for trade unions intervention. Thatcher encouraged everybody in society to play a part in ownership in the companies they worked and in the houses they live in.

  2. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    They had been willing to work with the other revolutionary and reformist parties. Lenin changed that. In his speech on his arrival at Petrograd's Finland Station on 3 April, he declared that the February Revolution, far from giving Russia political freedom, had created a 'parliamentary-bourgeois republic'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work