• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is the policy process in Britain open and democratic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The purpose of this essay is to answer the question: "To what extent is the policy process in Britain open and democratic?" In order to accomplish this, the terms 'democracy' and policy' will be defined, a brief overview of the policy process will be given, and groups who influence the policy process will be identified and their role within it examined. 'The function of democracy is, fundamentally, to ensure the diffusion of power by stipulating that each citizen has the ability to influence the outcome of political decision-making'. (Fierlbeck K, 1998: page 51) In defining public, as opposed to private policy, it can be said simply that public policy is that which is determined by the state or at least by one of its organs. Public policy is that which has been deemed to be the concern of the state in general, so that governments are entitled to make decisions about it; to adjust, amend or replace policies. What governments cannot do is determine what is and what is not a matter for public policy making. They may try, but it is, in the end, forces outside their immediate control that decide where private ends and public begins. So that popular demand, global developments and economic determinants all affect the limits of public policy. (Jordan, A. G. and Richardson, J.J., 1987) The policy making process is usually a lengthy one. Bill Jones identified three main stages; initiation, formulation and implementation. Initiation is where the original idea comes from. ...read more.

Middle

Outside of government a wide variety of groups may get involved. Ideally, in a democracy, the whole of society should be involved. Practically, certain groups have better access and are better suited to translating their ideas into methods acceptable to, and usable by, the government machine. Think tanks, as the name suggests, have as their whole raison d'�tre deliberating over societal and economic ills and thinking up new ways of overcoming them. Approaching society from across the political spectrum, the more established think tanks are prolific in publishing pamphlets of an often original nature. They also act as sponsoring bodies for seminars and lectures. Purportedly independent of outside influences to maintain their credibility, most, nevertheless, have close links with a particular political party. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) and Demos were closely linked with the rise of the New Labour project, with the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) and the Social Market Foundation (SMF) maintaining firm links with the Right. (Parsons, W., 1995) Established bodies such as the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) or Trades Union Congress (TUC) maintain regular contact with ministers. Well-funded teams in regular contact with ministers and civil servants are generally a key factor in policy development. These reputable and high profile bodies will often be introduced into policy formation early as government attempts to kite-fly policy thoughts with key opinion formers and campaigning bodies. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, pressure groups form a vital part of our democratic process, providing government with an indication of the strength of public belief in an issue, as well as bringing a more focused argument to the issue. Pressure groups provide a useful counterweight for public opinion to campaign against the power of commercial interests. The sum being very much greater than the individual parts, pressure groups allow private citizens to make their voices heard in government. Small, affordable contributions allow the financing of human interest campaigns to balance those driven by the profit to be derived from government. (Dearlove, J. and Saunders, P., 2000) "The interest dynamic is ex officio selfish and, while interest groups have a valuable and often expert contribution to make to policy making, to allow them too great a sway over policy decisions is to subordinate the general public interest to the interest of a particular group." (James, S., 1997: page 212) Political parties set much store by publicising the importance they attach to their grass roots' contribution to policy development. All parties have a system in place whereby party members may pass ideas up the chain for adoption as policy. From the Labour Party Policy Forum or the Conservatives "Listening to Britain" road shows, through to resolutions at Conference, each party increasingly attempt to portray itself as THE democratic party, as the central policy machine simultaneously takes a firmer grip on internal debate. The fear of showing division in front of a rampant press pack means that single-issue campaigning bodies increasingly take responsibility for driving forward the innovative agenda. (Parsons, W. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The media plays an important role in society. What is its role and to ...

    There are not always plus points of 1 individual being the main owner of the media, this is a worrying view.

  2. What immigration policy should Britain have?

    This means that Britain should not allow any further immigration, and as with all the other immigration policies there are advantages and disadvantages of the 'closed borders' policy. The advantages are that people in Britain could no longer claim that immigrants are taking all the jobs and this could no

  1. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    A few weeks later, in January 1886, after the Conservatives had been defeated in Parliament on a radical amendment for agrarian reform, Salisbury resigned and Gladstone returned to power. The partition of Africa largely preoccupied Salisbury's second ministry (1886-92) and remained a source of serious Anglo-French conflict until 1898.

  2. The Uk policy making process.

    programmes, and so he deliberately asked very anodyne questions about agricultural policy. He was so successful in fact that perhaps only a couple of dozen backbench Labour MPs had the strategic awareness to realise what their Leader was doing; many were visibly bemused at his apparently weak showing in the Commons.

  1. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    Economically both sides were particularly symmetric, earning hundreds of millions from oil industry (MPLA) and diamond industry (UNITA). To begin with low oil prices caused difficulties for MPLA, but this was resolved in 1999 by receiving $900 million in 'signature bonuses' from numerous oil companies for rights to explore and produce oil in blocks 31-33 off the shore of Angola47.

  2. With reference to material you have studied discuss the major policy differences between the ...

    As with SF the SDLP believe that the NSMC is a legitimate and realistic means through which links with the ROI can be truly formalised and matters of mutual concern such as co-operation in trade, travel and tourism can all help bring about a stronger union with the Republic.

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    The latter plan, in effect, confined a plebiscite to just the Vale of Kashmir. Confident that Sheikh Abdullah could secure the Valley for India, Nehru favored the second plan; for the same reason Pakistan rejected it (though officially the claimed it was because the State should be considered as a whole; it could not be partitioned).

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    But the government rejected the demand of Chief Justice and even reduced the number of judges in the Supreme Court. Then the second confrontation was with the military and it was for the first time that the Chief of the Army Staff had to give his resignation due to a confrontation with the prime Minister.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work