• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was 'Inept Leadership' responsible for the failure of Chartism? Why did Chartism fail, if it did in fact fail at all? It was a widespread movement with mass support, which dominated late-1830s and 1840s politics. It even had a context of revolution in Europe and the (limited) success of the 1832 Reform act, yet no key goals were achieved within its lifetime. The search for a definitive explanation for this has led historians to cite reasons as diverse as the improvement of economic conditions; the strong, confident handling of the movement by the government; and the issue of the quality of leadership within the movement. Therefore we must look at all the separate viewpoints on the 'failure' and decide how much of a bearing the apparent 'ineptitude' of its leadership had. The issue of whether Chartism was a complete failure is perhaps important in understanding why it did not achieve any of its aims in its own lifetime. A view that seems to ring most true is that what Chartism achieved was not in legislation, but rather in raising the mental, spiritual and emotional capacities of the working classes in early industrial Britain1. ...read more.

Middle

The failure of Chartism to gain any parliamentary support, or in other key areas, was another reason for its failure, as it would have been perceived as going nowhere. This factor can be more attributed to failings in leadership as O'Connor's attempt to become MP for Oldham ended in defeat, while the presentation of a petition with over 3 million fake signatures in 1848, would have done little to increase political integrity for Chartism, even though Chartists would have seen the day as successful, having passed without violence. Of course, this error of judgement on O'Connor's part led to severe mocking of the movement and increased tension with William Lovett. The government amplified this failing, and so ridicule was placed upon the movement. Again a slight failing was sufficient for the strong government to undermine the movement and its aims. While it is of great importance to emphasise the assured strength of the government, it is also impossible to talk about the failure of Chartism without referring to the economic and social changes that gave the movement its context. It is rather simplistic (and in my opinion wrong) ...read more.

Conclusion

Of course there were weaknesses amongst the leadership, but there is every indication that the movement could have succeeded, such was the nature and quantity of support. This was inspired by O'Connor and his "Northern Star", therefore making him both essential and burdensome (due to his splits with other Chartist leaders) to the movement. Likewise, the context both aided and hindered Chartism. The greatest achievement of the leaders was to bring political ideas filled with hope to the working classes, which was in my opinion a success for a movement that was perhaps 'ahead of its time'. 1 Chartism (2nd edition). Edward Royle (Longman group UK Ltd., 1986) 2 1848. John Saville (1987) 3 Chartism. C. Thorne (Macmillan, 1966) 4 The Chartists: Popular politics in the Industrial Revolution. Dorothy Thompson (Temple Smith, 1984) 5 London Chartism, 1838-1848. David Goodway (Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp.129-43) 6 The origins and nature of Chartism. Edward Royle (History Review, 1992, pp.30-34) 7 Taking Chartism Seriously. Clive Behagg (Modern History Review, 1996, pp.2-4) 8 Labour and Reform, Working Class Movements : 1815-1914. Clive Behagg (Hodder & Stoughton, 1991) 9 A letter to the Northern Star. Female Chartists of Manchester in 1842. 10 Chartism. Edward Royle....(Longman, 1986) 11 see above (10) 12 Taking Chartism Seriously. Clive Behagg (Modern History Review, 1996) 13 1848. John Saville (1987) 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Secondly, they also had the ability to pass of the campaign as some sort of religious crusade. They used quotes from the Bible, which said that denying a man corn was sinful etc. The simple fact that the ACLL were a single-issue pressure group provided some degree of clarity, which was an advantage in rallying support and influencing government.

  2. The Prime Ministerial Tenure of John Major: a failure of leadership?

    Since the first post-war election in 1945 (and including), the Conservative Party has successfully won eight out of fourteen elections (up to, but not including, the 1997 election), compared to Labour's five. This record of electoral victories may not be much different from Labour's record, but the essence of the

  1. The woman's suffrage movement grew out of the changing relationship between men and women ...

    Mrs Pankhurst starved herself but because of her age and weakness she was never forcibly fed. Marcus (1987) argues,"The depictions of forcible feeding in several suffragette representations may be clearly read as rape scenes."(p.16) Over a thousand women experienced this violation of their bodies and the violence of tubes thrust

  2. Why did Britain have no '1848 revolution'?

    Thus we can see fundamental differences between Britain and Europe leading to different types of movements. In Britain the existing system had shown its self to be responsive to agitation for change. Charles Grey saw the best way to conserve the traditional political order was to promote a measure of reform giving concessions such as the Reform act of 1832.

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    Gandhi, a pacifist by nature, opposed the war effort but also used it to try and, in one final push, gain independence. Congress leaders backed Gandhi by refusing to support the war effort unless India could participate as an independent state.

  2. Account for the failures of the Chartist movement in the 19th century.

    It was the fond expectation of the people that a remedy for most of their grievances would be found in the Reform Act of 1832...They have been bitterly deceived...The Reform Act has transferred power from one domineering fraction to another, and left the people as helpless as before...We perform the

  1. Free essay

    Outline the principal sources of authority available to US presidents. How similar is executive ...

    in order to win over both congress and public opinion, two crucial groups to keep satisfied in order to properly implement his policy agenda. There is then a subset of factors that influence the extent to which the president can carry out the above activities.

  2. The failure of Chartism was due to improved economical conditions rather than the movement's ...

    As for the railway boom in this period, Chartism was at least effective in the areas concerned as the unemployment here was soaked by the workers needed. In 1839 the rural police act ensured that a nationwide police force was able to monitor and deal with any outbreak of discontent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work