• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Conservative political weakness (1846-1866) the result of poor leadership?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Conservative political weakness (1846-1866) the result of poor leadership? The vociferously fought issue of Corn Law repeal culminated in a victory for the free traders but a complete split in the Conservative Party, which would not gain a lasting position of power until 1867. Conservative strength or weakness, in this period, rested on whether the 'Peelite' faction could be enticed into rejoining the other, protectionist Conservatives, or whether the Conservatives could increase their popularity dramatically, so as to gain a majority without any need for support from certain Peelites, Radicals, Irish or Whigs. Neither of these 'goals' was achieved between 1846 and 1866, as is made clear by the lack of any Conservative administration exceeding just a few months. There are several reasons why they were not, and whilst poor leadership had perhaps some input, other factors were equally, if not more, responsible. ...read more.

Middle

He did try to heal the wounds of 1846, by deliberately denouncing protection as 'not only dead, but damned!', but Gladstone and other former Conservatives mistrusted and detested him, due to both prejudice and anger at his scathing attacks on Peel, during the Corn Law debates, and were therefore unwilling to rejoin him. There was also some lack of confidence from within his own ranks, as was exemplified by the reluctance of the party to support his and Bentinck's stance;"where is your Christianity if you do not let in their Judaism?", over the issue of tolerance towards Jewish membership of Parliament (a practising Jew was elected for the City of London). The subsequent criticism from the rest of the party, mostly backbench squires, culminated in Bentinck's resignation. However, Disraeli made steady progress, arguably as quickly as was possible, and in this period laid the foundations for the Conservative comeback afterwards. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1851, Derby failed to assemble a government due to lack of talent, and the 1852 cabinet was known as "who, who?". Disraeli, Chancellor of the Exchequer, was known to have admitted to knowing nothing about his position, and his budget was defeated, spelling the end of the Tories' brief office. One can conclude that Derby's Conservative leadership was weak, and that it did have a detrimental effect on the fortunes of the party. However, as Derby did little, and Disraeli was leader in the Commons, he was the effective leader, and his leadership was quite strong. Furthermore, there were other, more important factors in ensuring that the Tories were weak, mainly that the divisions caused by the repeal of the Corn Laws were so great that they could not be healed (meaning a period of recovery was inevitable), as well as poor electoral results, lack of trust in Disraeli (some due to prejudice) and lack of able, protectionist politicians. ?? ?? ?? ?? Aaron Collins 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was the weakness of the radicals the cause of Pitt surviving ...

    This is not to say that the government had no success as they captured and convicted around 200 people in the 1790's of seditious libel and deported a few of the main radical leaders. The government also published anti-radical literature in the form of newspapers such as "The Sun" and "The True Briton", to turn the public against radicals.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Peel put a lot of time and money into foreign policy. He believe that he must maintain the status quo in order to keep his part interest secured and to do this a strong law and order system needed top be maintained and secured.

  1. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    was Peel who was the leader of the government who suggested the repeal, which led to the split in the party. However to really understand why Peel is so much to blame for making the issue of repeal the final straw we must look at his actions leading up to his announcement that he supported repeal.

  2. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    they could broadcast their dissent or made their support conditional on concessions from the whips. A less deferential party conference applauded Eurosceptics and other Conservative critics of Major's government. John Major confided privately that some of his MPs had a death wish.

  1. "The unpopularity of their policies was the most important reason why the conservatives were ...

    Therefore his efforts to awaken the Conservatives to a new age were regarded by many with suspicion. Moreover, since the Conservatives were in power for only two, very short lengths of time, they had very little opportunity to convince the electorate that their policies now combined contemporary ideals with traditional elements.

  2. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    The feasibility of bargaining between the ANC and the organisational expressions of minority society is strengthened by the fact that bargaining between the ANC and private interests, and between those interests themselves across racial and political divides, has become a significant element of social and political life.

  1. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    But unfortunately the desire of Benazir to control Punjab was so obsessive that President had to step in. Benazir was quite lucky that she has the support of Aslam Baig, the Chief of Army Staff, on her side. General Baig sheltered her from the opposition and gave shelter to the government from the attacks of the opposition.

  2. How far was the ascendancy of the Conservative party in British politics from 1923 ...

    The adoption of "New Conservatism" in 1924 demonstrated that the Conservatives could appeal to the working class and was a major step in modernising the party. The emphasis placed on social harmony, an improvement in industrial relations and a commitment to peace proved popular with the public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work