• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Conservative political weakness (1846-1866) the result of poor leadership?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Conservative political weakness (1846-1866) the result of poor leadership? The vociferously fought issue of Corn Law repeal culminated in a victory for the free traders but a complete split in the Conservative Party, which would not gain a lasting position of power until 1867. Conservative strength or weakness, in this period, rested on whether the 'Peelite' faction could be enticed into rejoining the other, protectionist Conservatives, or whether the Conservatives could increase their popularity dramatically, so as to gain a majority without any need for support from certain Peelites, Radicals, Irish or Whigs. Neither of these 'goals' was achieved between 1846 and 1866, as is made clear by the lack of any Conservative administration exceeding just a few months. There are several reasons why they were not, and whilst poor leadership had perhaps some input, other factors were equally, if not more, responsible. ...read more.

Middle

He did try to heal the wounds of 1846, by deliberately denouncing protection as 'not only dead, but damned!', but Gladstone and other former Conservatives mistrusted and detested him, due to both prejudice and anger at his scathing attacks on Peel, during the Corn Law debates, and were therefore unwilling to rejoin him. There was also some lack of confidence from within his own ranks, as was exemplified by the reluctance of the party to support his and Bentinck's stance;"where is your Christianity if you do not let in their Judaism?", over the issue of tolerance towards Jewish membership of Parliament (a practising Jew was elected for the City of London). The subsequent criticism from the rest of the party, mostly backbench squires, culminated in Bentinck's resignation. However, Disraeli made steady progress, arguably as quickly as was possible, and in this period laid the foundations for the Conservative comeback afterwards. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1851, Derby failed to assemble a government due to lack of talent, and the 1852 cabinet was known as "who, who?". Disraeli, Chancellor of the Exchequer, was known to have admitted to knowing nothing about his position, and his budget was defeated, spelling the end of the Tories' brief office. One can conclude that Derby's Conservative leadership was weak, and that it did have a detrimental effect on the fortunes of the party. However, as Derby did little, and Disraeli was leader in the Commons, he was the effective leader, and his leadership was quite strong. Furthermore, there were other, more important factors in ensuring that the Tories were weak, mainly that the divisions caused by the repeal of the Corn Laws were so great that they could not be healed (meaning a period of recovery was inevitable), as well as poor electoral results, lack of trust in Disraeli (some due to prejudice) and lack of able, protectionist politicians. ?? ?? ?? ?? Aaron Collins 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    The new Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly were both elected by AMS in May 1999 as will be the London Assembly in May 2000. Arguments used in favour: * It results in broadly proportional representation along party lines while ensuring that there is a directly accountable MP for each constituency.

  2. To what extent was the weakness of the radicals the cause of Pitt surviving ...

    This is not to say that the government had no success as they captured and convicted around 200 people in the 1790's of seditious libel and deported a few of the main radical leaders. The government also published anti-radical literature in the form of newspapers such as "The Sun" and "The True Briton", to turn the public against radicals.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Peel put a lot of time and money into foreign policy. He believe that he must maintain the status quo in order to keep his part interest secured and to do this a strong law and order system needed top be maintained and secured.

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    was Peel who was the leader of the government who suggested the repeal, which led to the split in the party. However to really understand why Peel is so much to blame for making the issue of repeal the final straw we must look at his actions leading up to his announcement that he supported repeal.

  1. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    wish to press for accountability, and whether those who are not will be hamstrung by their lack of credibility among the majority. Repayment environment Mary R Tomlinson (March 1999) states that a very big problem that is extremely difficult to manage in South Africa is the failure of many township

  2. To what extent can the failure of the Fascist Movement to challenge the existing ...

    The other half were a political faction who were dedicated in the spreading of Fascist propaganda. Despite the message Olympia had given about the public's hate of violence Mosley concluded in 1937 that he was in favour of the militarists.

  1. Churchill's Leadership

    Some could see this as Churchill's down fall, giving Labour a chance to show their best qualities. Some could even argue that Churchill encouraging the Labour politicians to join the Coalition Government resulted in Labours Victory later on in 1945.

  2. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    The Labour government was dependent on a growing economy, but when this fell into decline cuts in public expenditure became inevitable. With the cuts came the end of the socialist advances, dependent as they were on the availability of resources.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work