• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Conservative political weakness (1846-1866) the result of poor leadership?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Conservative political weakness (1846-1866) the result of poor leadership? The vociferously fought issue of Corn Law repeal culminated in a victory for the free traders but a complete split in the Conservative Party, which would not gain a lasting position of power until 1867. Conservative strength or weakness, in this period, rested on whether the 'Peelite' faction could be enticed into rejoining the other, protectionist Conservatives, or whether the Conservatives could increase their popularity dramatically, so as to gain a majority without any need for support from certain Peelites, Radicals, Irish or Whigs. Neither of these 'goals' was achieved between 1846 and 1866, as is made clear by the lack of any Conservative administration exceeding just a few months. There are several reasons why they were not, and whilst poor leadership had perhaps some input, other factors were equally, if not more, responsible. ...read more.

Middle

He did try to heal the wounds of 1846, by deliberately denouncing protection as 'not only dead, but damned!', but Gladstone and other former Conservatives mistrusted and detested him, due to both prejudice and anger at his scathing attacks on Peel, during the Corn Law debates, and were therefore unwilling to rejoin him. There was also some lack of confidence from within his own ranks, as was exemplified by the reluctance of the party to support his and Bentinck's stance;"where is your Christianity if you do not let in their Judaism?", over the issue of tolerance towards Jewish membership of Parliament (a practising Jew was elected for the City of London). The subsequent criticism from the rest of the party, mostly backbench squires, culminated in Bentinck's resignation. However, Disraeli made steady progress, arguably as quickly as was possible, and in this period laid the foundations for the Conservative comeback afterwards. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1851, Derby failed to assemble a government due to lack of talent, and the 1852 cabinet was known as "who, who?". Disraeli, Chancellor of the Exchequer, was known to have admitted to knowing nothing about his position, and his budget was defeated, spelling the end of the Tories' brief office. One can conclude that Derby's Conservative leadership was weak, and that it did have a detrimental effect on the fortunes of the party. However, as Derby did little, and Disraeli was leader in the Commons, he was the effective leader, and his leadership was quite strong. Furthermore, there were other, more important factors in ensuring that the Tories were weak, mainly that the divisions caused by the repeal of the Corn Laws were so great that they could not be healed (meaning a period of recovery was inevitable), as well as poor electoral results, lack of trust in Disraeli (some due to prejudice) and lack of able, protectionist politicians. ?? ?? ?? ?? Aaron Collins 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The weakness of the Whig government from 1835-1841 was the most important reason for ...

    However Peel had the ability to organise budgets. It was the budget situation that truly highlighted the Whigs problems and forced them to resign.

  2. To what extent was Northumberland more successful in solving mid Tudor political problems than ...

    The 1547 was a savage attack on vagrants looking for work, who were seen by the government as a cause of riots and sedition. The new laws were widely unpopular and the rising level of popular discontent forced the Privy council to take measures to appease public agitation.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Malta since 1947 (see Malta: STV With Some Twists), and once in Estonia in 1990. It is also used in Australia for elections to the Tasmanian House of Assembly, the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly, and the federal Senate (see The Alternative Vote in Australia); and in Northern Ireland local elections.

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    was Peel who was the leader of the government who suggested the repeal, which led to the split in the party. However to really understand why Peel is so much to blame for making the issue of repeal the final straw we must look at his actions leading up to his announcement that he supported repeal.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Peel put a lot of time and money into foreign policy. He believe that he must maintain the status quo in order to keep his part interest secured and to do this a strong law and order system needed top be maintained and secured.

  2. How far were the Anti Corn Law League responsible for Peel's repeal of the ...

    1844, led by the Dukes of Buckingham and Richmond who had left the Whigs and joined the Conservatives because they suspected Whig policy on the Corn Laws: this was partly responsible for the 1841 Conservative victory. Agricultural M.P.s were afraid of upsetting their constituents.

  1. TO WHAT EXTENT WERE LLOYD GEORGE'S OWN POLICIES, RATHER THAN HIS DEPENDENCE ON THE ...

    His leadership lacked flair and effectiveness. Majority of the Conservatives were against spending money and believed in 'self help', and didn't want the government to become a 'nanny state'. As the economy was damaged after the war to fund these social reforms a healthy economy was required.

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    But the government rejected the demand of Chief Justice and even reduced the number of judges in the Supreme Court. Then the second confrontation was with the military and it was for the first time that the Chief of the Army Staff had to give his resignation due to a confrontation with the prime Minister.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work