• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Conservative political weakness (1846-1866) the result of poor leadership?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Conservative political weakness (1846-1866) the result of poor leadership? The vociferously fought issue of Corn Law repeal culminated in a victory for the free traders but a complete split in the Conservative Party, which would not gain a lasting position of power until 1867. Conservative strength or weakness, in this period, rested on whether the 'Peelite' faction could be enticed into rejoining the other, protectionist Conservatives, or whether the Conservatives could increase their popularity dramatically, so as to gain a majority without any need for support from certain Peelites, Radicals, Irish or Whigs. Neither of these 'goals' was achieved between 1846 and 1866, as is made clear by the lack of any Conservative administration exceeding just a few months. There are several reasons why they were not, and whilst poor leadership had perhaps some input, other factors were equally, if not more, responsible. ...read more.

Middle

He did try to heal the wounds of 1846, by deliberately denouncing protection as 'not only dead, but damned!', but Gladstone and other former Conservatives mistrusted and detested him, due to both prejudice and anger at his scathing attacks on Peel, during the Corn Law debates, and were therefore unwilling to rejoin him. There was also some lack of confidence from within his own ranks, as was exemplified by the reluctance of the party to support his and Bentinck's stance;"where is your Christianity if you do not let in their Judaism?", over the issue of tolerance towards Jewish membership of Parliament (a practising Jew was elected for the City of London). The subsequent criticism from the rest of the party, mostly backbench squires, culminated in Bentinck's resignation. However, Disraeli made steady progress, arguably as quickly as was possible, and in this period laid the foundations for the Conservative comeback afterwards. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1851, Derby failed to assemble a government due to lack of talent, and the 1852 cabinet was known as "who, who?". Disraeli, Chancellor of the Exchequer, was known to have admitted to knowing nothing about his position, and his budget was defeated, spelling the end of the Tories' brief office. One can conclude that Derby's Conservative leadership was weak, and that it did have a detrimental effect on the fortunes of the party. However, as Derby did little, and Disraeli was leader in the Commons, he was the effective leader, and his leadership was quite strong. Furthermore, there were other, more important factors in ensuring that the Tories were weak, mainly that the divisions caused by the repeal of the Corn Laws were so great that they could not be healed (meaning a period of recovery was inevitable), as well as poor electoral results, lack of trust in Disraeli (some due to prejudice) and lack of able, protectionist politicians. ?? ?? ?? ?? Aaron Collins 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. TO WHAT EXTENT WERE LLOYD GEORGE'S OWN POLICIES, RATHER THAN HIS DEPENDENCE ON THE ...

    The way LG handled the Irish crisis didn't help his cause, it was the short-term consequences of the Anglo-Irish treaty signed in December 1921 which harmed him the most and thus was an event that eventually led to his exit.

  2. How far was the ascendancy of the Conservative party in British politics from 1923 ...

    Fortunately Labour's failure to tackle unemployment, their mishandling of the national dock strike and the Campbell case all caused the public to lose confidence in the Labour government. This benefited the Conservatives greatly as it not only relegated Labour to the position of opposition but also further undermined the Liberals position.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Peel put a lot of time and money into foreign policy. He believe that he must maintain the status quo in order to keep his part interest secured and to do this a strong law and order system needed top be maintained and secured.

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    We have looked at the economic and social reasons for the differing opinions on the repeal and thus the split in the party but it is now important to look at the role the man who suggested the repeal played.

  1. How far were the Anti Corn Law League responsible for Peel's repeal of the ...

    It was becoming clear that the Tory wing of his party was reluctant to give him the support he demanded and only a Vote of Confidence was keeping him in power. The League capitalised on this situation, mustering further support inside Parliament despite new groups such as the Anti-League in

  2. Conservative Victory of 1941, Peel and the Weakness of the Whigs.

    Now, the majority of Melbourne's government was quite small and accusations were being made that they were under the influence of erratic Irish MPs. This of course angered many Englishmen within the party and as a result, Daniel O'Connell and Lord Melbourne's relationship was watched very closely.

  1. To what extent can the failure of the Fascist Movement to challenge the existing ...

    for example, the basic division existing in the leadership of the BUF. Mosley only attempted to deal with this when the lack of funding forced him to make cuts, illustrating his inefficiency. In the party there were those who favoured a 'military' approach which they believed should consist of order, discipline and marches to demonstrate power.

  2. Churchill's Leadership

    Some could see this as Churchill's down fall, giving Labour a chance to show their best qualities. Some could even argue that Churchill encouraging the Labour politicians to join the Coalition Government resulted in Labours Victory later on in 1945.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work