• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the Great War responsible for the collapse of the Provisional Government in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was the Great War responsible for the collapse of the Provisional Government in 1917? ALEEM KHAN The Provisional Government assumed control of Russia following the abdication of the Tsar Nicholas II. It only had a brief period in power lasting about seven months. Historians have disputed the main cause for its failure, Marxist historians, such as John Reed; have rewarded it to the Bolshevik's effective propaganda machine, whilst more revisionist historians, such as Christopher Read, take a more encompassing position on the issue. They lay blame at a range of factors such as the First World War and the dual authority in relation to the Petrograd Soviet. Revisionist historians have also benefited from the post-glasnost era and hence have both greater access to more sources as well as the advantage of hindsight. To understand the reasons for the collapse of the Provisional Government it is crucial to be aware of the events leading up to the October Revolution and the atmosphere politically and socio-economically at the time. The year 1917 was a turbulent year of strikes, bad harvests and inflation. 'Week by week food became scarcer'1 and any that was available usually went to the soldiers. Russian agriculture was primitive and machinery was rarely used hence production was not efficient. ...read more.

Middle

The collapse of the Provisional Government is also partly due to its ineffectiveness and reliance upon the Soviet for approval. The Petrograd Soviet was a representative body of the workers and soldiers alike. On it sat elected members, something the Provisional Government lacked, from specific groups of workers and soldiers. Though it was set up prior to the Provisional Government, it was illegal until its existence. Morgan Philips Price helps understand why the Soviet did not assume power itself, 'The Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries believed that at that stage of the Revolution the workers and soldiers of the Army were unable to run the country alone and needed the cooperation of the middle-class Liberals.'5 Hence, the existence of the power sharing structure between the Provisional Government and the Petrograd Soviet was formed. However, over time the Provisional Government only became weaker whilst the Soviet gained greater strength. Crucial amongst all the changes that occurred in relation to power between the Soviet and the government was the edict Soviet Order No.1. This gave the Soviet control of the Army because it controlled the soldiers' support. The government without the backing of Army was toothless and would now have to rely on approval of its policies from the Soviet. The importance of the Soviet having such power would be limited had it not been for the First World War, which made soldiers a vital part of the system. ...read more.

Conclusion

The February Revolution was indeed important in the War; America's joining would not have occurred had it not been for the change of regime, since it did not want to support an anti-democratic autocracy. Therefore, the Provisional Government was crucial to the war and had it not been for the joining of the USA, the Germans might not have been as willing to sign a peace deal, following the October Revolution, helping to consolidate Bolshevik power. In conclusion, the Provisional Government lacked both authority and legitimacy, which were both characteristics of the Petrograd Soviet. Elections or some sort of approval was needed to give the government these features. The issue of land reform needed addressing and historians have seen this as an important factor in the government's loss of popularity. Furthermore, the propaganda from opposition groups, in particular the Bolsheviks, was effective in destroying any respect for the Provisional Government. Their liberal policies enabled this, which were unavailable to democratic countries during times of war. Kerensky was initially popular but the war damaged his image. The Great War created a situation of chaos and anarchy in Russia and government policy at the time did nothing to aid the situation. Its collapse was a result of a variety of factors and reasons but the far-reaching effects of the war were to have devastating results in both social and economic quarters. Moreover, the war only helped increase the opposition to the government and led to their downfall in October 1917. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    It is rather simplistic (and in my opinion wrong) to say that the support of the movement depended entirely upon a few empty stomachs. This would imply that the mass-support generated was "an unthinking group responding to very basic stimuli"8 and would miss the point that they were protesting for political aims.

  2. Comparing the German and Russian systems of government

    Power in Russia is basically divided between the parliament and the president. While in Germany the chancellor leads a cabinet of ministers and the president serves as a ceremonial head of state. The German system of Government is often called a "Kanzlerdemokratie" (a Chancellor's Democracy).

  1. Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning

    provisional government failed to provide for their needs shows there would have been tension between the two committees. There also would have been a conflict of interests between the two parties. The Provisional government would of wanted to make decisions in favour of the people they represented and it with the Petrograd Soviets.

  2. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    This allowed the Bolsheviks to learn what the public wanted, and attempted to handle their needs better than the Soviets could12. The Bolsheviks success was due to fact that they were able to meet the needs of the proletariat, and rid themselves of maintaining the interests of the bourgeoisie13.

  1. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    By the end of the Wilson Government in 1970 it was evident that the economy was experiencing low growth, rising inflation and rising unemployment at the same time and the Keynesian approach was not producing the desired result. Many foreign and defense policies, put in place by Attlee's Labour government of 1945, remained consistent throughout this period.

  2. What Are The Key Elements Of Thatcherism? To What Extent Was It A Reaction ...

    This interventionist approach was adopted by both parties - the 1950 Conservative manifesto said "We regard the maintenance of full employment as the first aim of a Conservative government." This seemed to work very well through the 1950s and much of the 1960s, with unemployment remaining very low, but by

  1. Free essay

    Women's contribution to the war

    As stated by Ferguson when men returned from the war "the process was put into quick reverse" showing that by 1918 women had not made a big enough impact to maintain their jobs.

  2. Devolution, is the granting of power by a superior authority to a minor authority. ...

    The head of the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) resigned but not the Member of the Scottish Parliament responsible for education, Sam Galbraith.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work