• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the socialist revival of the 1880's responsible for the emergence of the labour party?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the socialist revival of the 1880's responsible for the emergence of the labour party? It can be said that the labour party which came into existence in the early years of the 20th century was in fact a combination of three different socialist groups, the social democratic federation, the Fabian society and the independent labour party. The fact that there were actually three socialist movement groups during this time; though their numbers were small their influence was considerable, shows to us that there was a need for independent working class representation in parliament. However if this was the case then clearly how could John Saville bring himself to say that "the central and dominating components of the new organisation were the trade unions...but almost non of whom were socialists." There are many factors which enable us to pinpoint the socialist revival of the early 80's. There was a growing disillusionment of many radicals with the record of official liberalism. This was Gladstone's tenderness to the Whigs and his reluctance to embark on a programme of further social reform and his continuation of Disraeli's imperialistic policies in Egypt and South Africa and above all the government's support for coercion in Ireland, which seemed to contradict true liberal principles. ...read more.


The strike was successful and gave the strikers virtually all of their demands and gave a fresh impetus to their movement. Between previous Gladstonian politicians and trade unionists it can be said that the socialist revival during the 1880's did indeed contribute towards the emergence and the need for representation of the working class in parliament. This is supported in Pellings 2nd edition book "the early components of the labour party formed a curious mixture of political idealists and hard headed trade unionists of convinced socialists and loyal but disheartened Gladstonians" However the rise of the labour party was not as inevitable as some my think. It wasn't just the emergence of three separate constituents coming together, but there were a number of general factors in the late 19th century which had an important bearing on its formation Some historians question as to why it took so long as there had been an articulate radical working-class presence in British politics in one form or another since 1815, but when this is taken into account little has been done in terms of working class representation in parliament by the end of the 19th century, by the end of the 19th century neither popular conservatism and popular liberalism could really deliver the goods which was needed to satisfy the working classes. ...read more.


With the upsurge of trade union activity among formally poorly organised groups of unskilled workers suggests that socialism appealed to these new unions. Socialist leaders within these organisations would have a strong voice at meetings condemning the older trade unions. New machinery and new technology was undermining the position of many skilled craftsmen, skill didn't offer the security it once had, putting people out of work and making profit costs increases for business owners. All this contributed to unrest within the country and the need some sort of reform. In comparison as to whether the emergence of the labour party was a direct result of socialist revival, can be argued from both ways which I have shown. There are numerous factors which lean towards the notion that without the amalgamation of three separate constituent groups, and the new unions backing the formation of the party just wouldn't have been there, however without the social factors taking place, Gladstone's over emphasis on Ireland, neglecting social reform and new machinery, then there wouldn't have been unrest within the country, and there wouldn't be a need to seek for an alternative government for the working class. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    However, these middle classes could have proven to be treacherous towards the working classes after the various Acts in the early 1840s. A contribution to failure here is more due to the perception of the well-supported 'physical force' Chartism as being a sign that the working classes were somehow 'unready' for the vote.

  2. How and why did Federation occur?

    * Most were well educated and of fair skin. * Migrants were housed in Migrant Hostels that were hot in the summer and overcrowded. Nevertheless, they were taught English and this was a temporary solution. * Many Australian's treated the New Australians badly calling them names such as refo, eyetie or wog.

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Hence one can say that it wasn't a democratic institution. Napoleon left the military section of Malta in the hands of the General Vabois. One can also mention the various changes taken by Napoleon in administration. He divided the Maltese islands in 12 municipalities, 10 in Malta and 2 in

  2. "The Rise of the Labour Party between 1893-1914 was due more to the growth ...

    of Commons, leaving them with no representation and in desperate need of some financial support.

  1. Why the Labour Party overtook the Liberal Party

    To Macdonald, the 1923 election demonstrated that there was still a mass of middle-class, middle-of-the-road voters who still needed to be won to Labour's side. To do this, the party must establish itself as the natural alternative to the Conservatives.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Disraeli argue that "the first duty of an English Prime Minister is to be faithful to his party" and that "good and honourable government is not only consistent with that tie but in reality manly depend on its sacred observant."

  1. Why were the 1930's a decade of disappointment for the labour party?

    This is further evidence that the party was not productive in gaining support in the 1930's. After studying the various reasons why the 1930's was a decade of disappointment I can conclude that the most important causes for disappointment were the internal problems created mainly by the unstable nature of

  2. How successful was the 1945-51 labour government.

    The government also set up the Anglo-American council, which brought on the adoption of American methods, which were seen as superior in producing more from less. This method was effective, but many people wanted to concentrate on their own business rather than national effort.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work