• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent would such a claim truly reflect the relative importance of parties and pressure groups in communicating opinions in the 1990s?

Extracts from this document...


In the 1950s, R.T. McKenzie claimed "there can be no doubt that pressure groups, taken together, are a far more important channel of communication than parties for the transmission of political ideas from the mass of the citizenry to their rulers". To what extent would such a claim truly reflect the relative importance of parties and pressure groups in communicating opinions in the 1990s? McKenzie's argument about pressure groups being more important than political parties as channels of political communication can be proved by the membership of pressure groups and political parties in the 1990s. However, this is not to say that this statement is correct. On the one hand, pressure groups are important, as they are able to give the people a chance to voice their opinion on one specific issue. They are also able to exert considerable pressure on the government over a broad range of issues. On the other hand, political parties are able to communicate the public's opinion by election results. Although the public have to choose between a party's policies in a consumerist way, picking the best manifesto as a whole and not specific policy, election results are by far the best way the public as a whole can communicate their opinions to their rulers. ...read more.


The membership and size of pressure groups as a whole has grown in recent years and this is possibly a reflection of their increasing importance. Nowadays, a pressure group with a large membership would have a lot of sway over the government who would readily communicate with this pressure group as it would be seen to be representing a sizeable proportion of the electorate. For instance, CBI (Confederation of British Industry), represent the majority of business owners and employers and therefore would be communicated with should a policy affecting them be proposed. Groups such as this are classed as 'insider groups', as they often give advice to the government on policy implementation and therefore work, to some extent, inside the political system. Nevertheless, political parties still enjoy considerable importance in the communication between government and the public. The mass citizenry are able to communicate their ideas very effectively at the polls. Although they must decide on a group of policies as opposed to selecting their own, it is generally thought that a voter supports most of the policies of its chosen party. ...read more.


The representation, by MPs, of their electorate is an important part of political life as it allows smaller voices to be heard in the political din. By way of conclusion, it is fair to say that political parties offer more in the way of communication with the general public. The election is the strongest means of communicating directly with the rulers that the mass citizenry have. This is strengthened by the role the MPs they vote in can have in publicising an issue in parliament. Pressure groups do offer single issue representation to ordinary people, but they do not have the same power (and therefore importance) as political parties. It is important to understand that sometimes, though, the borders dividing political parties and pressure groups can be lacking clarity sometimes, take the examples of the Referendum Party and the Green Party. The role of the media is an important factor when considering the communication of opinions in the 1990s. Political parties receive much more coverage than pressure groups from the media, generally speaking. This could be a good indication of the importance of parties in comparison to pressure groups. All in all, although parties are the most important channel of communication between the populace and the government, pressure groups strengthen this interaction. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "Critically evaluate the relationship between Members of Parliament, political parties and pressure groups in ...

    New clauses may also be added. Report Stage(public bills) At this stage the house may make further amendments to the bill. This stage provides an opportunity to those who are not on the standing committee to move amendments to the bill. The amendments can be debated and either accepted or rejected Third Reading in the House of Commons (public bills)

  2. to what extent do pressure groups influence government

    This was shown in 2001 at the Kidderminster elections. The strength of the government's majority in the House of Commons and the state of the opposition are big factors in affecting the influence of pressure groups. Up until the May 2005 general elections, Tony Blair's sofa government had a big majority in the H.C.

  1. Political parties and representation

    What are the reasons for political representation? Representation is nowadays normally assumed to be essential for democracy. However, some would insist that direct democracy is the only 'true' form of democracy (all citizens vote on all issues). Thus Rousseau, The Social Contract: "Sovereignty, being nothing other than the general will, can never be alienated...

  2. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    Of course, the Indian side accuses Pakistan of using the US to cut its own military losses. The fact of the matter remains that the perception of both sides is that the UN was a mechanism used to further their own narrow national interests, and that the other side was playing the same game9.

  1. J. S. Mill Despre Libertate

    "Daca �ntreaga omenire, cu exceptia unui singur om ar fi de o parere si acel singur om de o parere contrarie, atunci omenirea ar fi tot at�t de putin �ndreptatitasa-l faca pe acel singur om sa taca ,pe c�t ar fi el de putin �ndreptatit sa cuteze sa faca restul omenirii sa taca."

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    The Constitution was parliamentary in nature. In this constitution a lot of stress was given on Islamic principles. After the National Assembly passed the 1973 Constitution, Bhutto was sworn-in as the Prime Minister of the country. Another very majoe decision taken by Bhutto was that he nationalized ten categories of major industries in Pakistan.


    and 'The Institute of Directors' have strong connections. Although the Labour Party has always had strong connections with trade unions, they have had more influence on the policies of the labour party than any other group has had on a political party. However, during the Thatcher Conservative government era of the 1980s new laws were introduced, which was

  2. Political parties and pressure groups.

    The conservative party would probably be even more pro-war but as it doesn't hold power its divisions over Iraq are somewhat suppressed and some other party division have even been swept under the carpet as media coverage is centred on Iraq, this could be seen when IDS recently sacked modernisers

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work