• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

UK Written Constitutionshould the legislative process in Parliament be designed to secure that 'unconstitutional' bills are not passed? How could that be

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Given that the UK does not have a written constitution, should the legislative process in Parliament be designed to secure that 'unconstitutional' bills are not passed? How could that be done? 1,479 words The issue of whether legislative processes should be changed to ensure that 'unconstitutional' bills are not passed largely depends on one's definition of 'unconstitutional'. This essay will follow Lord Reid's definition of 'unconstitutional' acts as those acts where 'the moral, political and other reasons against doing them are so strong that most people would regard it as highly improper if Parliament did these things.'1 It is apparent from this definition that the relationship between legislative sovereignty and democracy is central as to whether processes should be put in place to secure that 'unconstitutional' bills are not passed. Once this relationship has been established, the various ways to prevent the passing of 'unconstitutional' bills will be discussed. The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, as proposed by Dicey, states that Parliament has, under the English Constitution, the supreme right to make or unmake any law whatsoever. No person or body has the legal right to override or set aside Parliamentary legislation.2 Subsequently, if legislative processes prevented Parliament's ability to pass 'unconstitutional' bills, this would undermine Parliamentary sovereignty. This democratic basis is further supported by Ewing; 'parliamentary sovereignty is the legal and constitutional device which best gives effect to the principle of popular sovereignty.'3 Dicey's doctrine though is subject to the fact that England has no written constitution. ...read more.

Middle

they are guided by administrative and political guidelines rather than substantive principles.20 As Oliver suggest, the solution lies in the implementation of non-statutory scrutiny standards and checklists, independent from the subject matter of the bill.21 These standards would serve a referential and educational role for committees, improving the scrutinisation process and the substantive content of bills. However, as Oliver concedes, select committees cannot prevent Parliament passing 'unconstitutional' bills as they can only ensure that Parliament is aware of 'the departure from normal expectations.'22 Hence, scrutiny standards can only act as checks against 'unconstitutional' bills. A body that can prevent the passing of 'unconstitutional' bills has to have legitimacy to exercise legislative power and maintain constitutionally democratic principles. Whilst the House of Commons has the legislative authority, it is highly partisan and with the government's majority in the house, it is unlikely that it will perform non-partisan function vital to democracy.23 This is illustrated in the failure of Parliament to make changes to parliamentary scrutiny recommended by the Liaison and Modernization Committee. The House of Lords however is fairly apolitical as its members are 'relatively free from party pressures'24 and there are a large number of cross-benchers. Furthermore, its members tend to be experienced and experts in their respective fields. This means that debates in the house is based more on merits rather than party loyalty.25 As Russell concludes, an independent upper-house 'can help create a form of consensus politics which results in better political outcomes in the longer term.'26 The non-partisan nature and the security of tenure of the Lords enable the house to give substantive considerations to constitutional issues. ...read more.

Conclusion

8 P.P.Craig 'Dicey: Unitary, Self-Correcting Democracy and Public Law' (1990) 106 L.Q.R. 105 at132 9 D.Oliver 'The Modernization of the United Kingdom Parliament' at 260 in Jowell and Oliver, eds, The Changing Constitution, (2004) Oxford University Press, 5th edn. 10 Ibid at 260 11 Ibid. 12 Bradley, supra n5, at 60 13 M. Elliot 'Parliamentary sovereignty and the new constitutional order: legislative freedom, political reality and convention' 22 Legal Studies (2002) at 344 14 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 15 R. Hazell 'Who is guardian of legal values in the legislative process: Parliament or the Executive?' [2004] Public Law 495, at 495. 16 D. Feldman 'The Impact of Human Rights on the UK Legislative Process' [2004] 25(2) Stat.L.R. 17 House of Commons Liaison Committee; HC 300 (1999-2000); HC 748 (2000-1); HC 321 (2000-1) 18 Modernization Committee; HC 224 (2001-2), para 4 19 Ibid. 20 D. Oliver 'Improving the Scrutiny of Bills: The case for Standards and Checklists' [2006] Public Law 219 at 222 21 Ibid at 239. 22 Ibid at 239. 23 Oliver , supra n9, at 267-8 24 Ibid at 272. 25 Ibid. 26 M. Russell Reforming the Lords: Lessons from Overseas (Oxford University Press, 2000) at 164 27 G. Phillipson '"The greatest quango of them all", a "rival chamber" or "hybrid nonsense"? Solving the Second Chamber Paradox' [2004] Public Law 352 at 379. 28 Ibid at 359. 29 Ibid at 366. 30 Oliver, supra n9, at 278 31 Ibid. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the United Kingdom Parliament is sovereign. Consider both legal ...

    However, it would not be politically viable, and this is where the problem of Parliamentary Sovereignty lies - legally it is Sovereign, but this is not always the case in the political context.

  2. What is a written constitution?

    Controversies The term unwritten constitution refers to a constitution where none of the sources of constitution are written down, which would obviously be very difficult to interpret. It would be argued by many people that the UK needs a written constitution in order to provide greater accountability and democracy.

  1. To what extent is Parliament supreme?

    came into force in October 2000. This delay in bringing an Act into effect is very common. In this case, the time between the Act being given the Royal Assent and its becoming law was considered necessary to allow judges to familiarise themselves and be trained on the new laws, and also for government departments to

  2. What means are available to parliament and how effective is its scrutiny of the ...

    policy formulation and implementation by government rather than solely its legislative functions. Select committees usually remain a feature of governmental scrutiny on a permanent basis once they are created, for example the Public Accounts Committee. The composition of select committees remains the same until a new government is elected, in

  1. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    They demanded their own courts of law and also to keep control over their churches, disregarding the Church of England. One final significant difference is the emergence of Edinburgh as a competitor to London. With their own separate body of Scots' law, the supreme courts in Edinburgh "offer a high-level

  2. There are many influences operating on parliament before and during the legislative process. Explain ...

    The Consent for Homosexuals Act ( ) was a clear example of the government bowing to public opinion and the efforts of pressure groups, where the government agreed to reduce the age of consent for homosexual acts in private from 21 years of age to 18.

  1. The Legislative acts as a check on the Executive - To what extent is ...

    Montesquieu did not mean that the legislature and executive ought to have no influence or control over the acts of each other, but only that neither should exercise the whole power of the other. Although the separation of powers between the executive and the legislature is imperfect for the following

  2. For my creative piece I have written a short story set in the future, ...

    It is since then that I have worn this robe and attempted to talk normal." Jim sat in anticipation and baited breath, "You mean you're..." "William Hague. Tory party leader. Judo green belt." "Sorry, got a bit carried away there; haven't spoken to many people over the years."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work