• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the evidence of Sources 2, 3 and 5, and your own knowledge explain what considerations influenced Cromwell's decision to reject the offer of the Crown in 1657?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Using the evidence of Sources 2, 3 and 5, and your own knowledge explain what considerations influenced Cromwell's decision to reject the offer of the Crown in 1657? The new constitution was called the Humble Petition and Advice and was presented to Cromwell in March 1657. It was an attempt to return to the 'good old days' when the monarch's powers were checked by the Privy Council and both Houses of Parliament. Cromwell was also invited to be King. Cromwell struggled over a month as to what he should do. In the end, Cromwell accepted most of the Humble Petition but rejected the crown. This poses the question as to why Cromwell turned down the offer of the crown; different schools of thoughts have proposed different views. Some historians believe Cromwell had been greatly influenced by the army's opposition to the crown. The soldiers had objected because many had fought in the Civil Wars to remove the institution of monarchy and regarded, as 'dangerous to the people of England', and if Cromwell did accept the crown it would mean the end of the 'good old cause'. In addition, by accepting the crown it would have supported the army's charges of hypocrisy and ambition. Therefore, some historians believe that Cromwell was deterred because the majority of his senior officers were against the idea of the crown, as shown by R. Hutton (in Source 5), "Lambert, Fleetwood and Desborough all told the Protector that they would resign", this shows that there was a threat from the senior officers, particularly by those who "loved him". However, other historians find it difficult to believe that the army was prime consideration; this is because Cromwell had outfaced the army on previous occasions. This is supported by Source 3, Earl of Clarendon's book The History of Rebellion, he believes that Cromwell was "not terrified with the opposition from Lambert", however Clarendon advances to say that Cromwell did feel threatened by the "obstinacy of those who he knew loved him", particularly Desborough, this shows that Cromwell was threatened by the army opposition, but to the lesser extent. ...read more.

Middle

One of the principal factors which prevented Cromwell from reaching a lasting political settlement was the poor relationship between Cromwell and Parliament. Initially Parliament were angered by the fact that the Instrument of Government (December 1653) had been proposed and imposed by army officers, in particular Lambert, thus the constitution lacked legitimacy. Many MP's objected the powers given by the constitution to Cromwell and the army. The members of the First Protectorate Parliament (September 1654) were not submissive to Cromwell and most had conflicts with some aspect of the constitution. Parliament refused to ratify the constitution, meaning that Cromwell's government had no authority to continue, which weakened the relationship further and moved away from being able to reach a political settlement. Moreover, Parliament failed to pass thee 84 ordinances of Cromwell, which showed that Parliament and Protector were unable to work together, eventually leading to the dissolution after 5 lunar months. Cromwell demanded that all MP's swear an Oath of Loyalty to the Protectorate, this was an attempt to unite Parliament and Protector, but those who refused were excluded, and those who stayed only did so to dismantle the constitution clause by clause. Thus, most of the nation was "boggled" at what the Instrument stood for. The Second Protectorate Parliament (September 1656) soon angered Cromwell, particularly over the case of James Naylor. Cromwell did not agree with harsh punishment, as he wanted to achieve liberty of conscience, thus disrupted the relationship between Parliament and Protector. Source 1 shows the other consequence of the Naylor case, that Cromwell felt it was "time to come to settlement" and to "lay aside arbitrary proceedings", which shows that Cromwell felt that the Instrument of Government was ineffective and there needed to be further checks and balances of power, and he expresses the need for a "judicial power" that could "determine men's punishments"; these issues needed to be addressed, which the Instrument of Government was clearly not able to. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thirdly, the Humble Petition and Advice still had army influence, and they continued to be a major force within the Protectorate. Cromwell used his powers to promote his colleagues to the Upper House, who were predominantly army members. Cromwell's close attachment to the army made it unlikely to gain a long term settlement because the majority opposed the army influence in political affairs. Source 5 shows that the army did have an impact on Cromwell, specifically when he was offered the crown, at first Cromwell "expressed his readiness to accept", however the opposition faced from the army "compelled Cromwell's decision". Undoubtedly, the army did play a role in influencing Cromwell's decision to reject the crown, but to what extent is still debateable. The intervention of the army in politics was definitely a 'fatal internal contradiction' because Cromwell was leading a nation opposed to any military element in government with the army, resulting in everlasting disputes. In conclusion, Cromwell was not able to reach lasting political settlement due to the 'fatal internal contradictions' and there were many of them, which hindered the aim of establishing an inclusive and stable government. Cromwell's crisis was that it "embraced two divergent trends" and because of this, the effects of the two conflicting aims were able to be seen throughout the Protectorate. There were 'fatal internal contradictions' in the sense that there were too many conflicting interests to please, and that the Cromwell was far too closely associated with the army and its politicisation. There were further conflicts between establishing godly rule for which Cromwell needed the army and arriving at political settlement which would be long-lasting. These conflicts within the Protectorate were serious and this became apparent when the republic collapsed. The political settlement was fairly stable in the short-term but it collapsed in the long-term. Cromwell needed to "come to a settlement, and lay aside arbitrary proceedings" but with all the 'internal contradictions', he was not able to establish a lasting political settlement by the time of his death in September 1658. Sarah Raza 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Chartist aims and methods - Source related study.

    This could be due to a number of reasons. The most important reason as to why they thought in this manner, is because they were middle-class citizens. They represented the middle-class, those who were craftsmen and skilled artisans, most of whom were educated and schooled.

  2. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    Singapore, for example, bans pornographic sites in order to restrict the negative influences that come with it. However, in the modern world and with the spread of the Internet these "negative" influences will become even harder to contain and the Singaporean government has begun to relax these restrictions in recent years.

  1. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    Under apartheid, the black majority was segregated, and was denied political and economic rights equal to those of whites, this had become a distressing daily routine for the Africans.

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    The subject of nationalism has been ever present in Scotland, although they had to wait until 1999 to gain any control over their home affairs. Once finalised, the Scottish Parliament had 129 members, a Chief Minister who selects the Cabinet, tax raising powers, the right to make laws and the

  1. 'Nationalist Groups in the Sub-Continent played the most significant role in Britain's decision to ...

    The 1935 Government of India Act had promised eventual self-government for India as a Dominion, and the new constitution introduced in 1937, allowed the INC to take control of most provinces.

  2. "Keeping Nelson Mandela in Prison Between 1964 and 1990 was a mistake" Do Sources ...

    However the years following his speech shows Mandela as a statesman, living to his word "In the name of peace, democracy and freedom" and using the remaining years of his life to try and live up to it. Source E is a statistical piece of evidence showing the election results from 1994.

  1. Critically evaluate the impact of the National Lottery since its inception on the arts ...

    An article in the Guardian explains that "the concern is that this sets a precedent, with lottery funding priorities being set by the Government, rather than the independent distributors, and lottery players 'choosing' their cause by playing a certain game" (Shifrin, 2004, http://society.guardian.co.uk/ lottery/story/0,8150,451260,00.html )

  2. Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what ...

    The National Church was aimed at 'saving' the people of England, it was able to guide and teach people, thus reform manners and behaviour. In addition, the system of Triers and Ejectors set up in 1654 was effective as local commissioners had the power to expel ministers of low standards.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work