• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what do you consider to have been the main strengths and weaknesses of the Protectorate, 1653-1658?

Extracts from this document...


a) Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what do you consider to have been the main strengths and weaknesses of the Protectorate, 1653-1658? Cromwell was installed as Lord Protector in December 1653, and throughout his time as Protector, Cromwell aimed to 'heal and settle' the wounds of the past and to create a 'godly England'. However, by the end of his life the Protectorate had the support of a narrow population. Nevertheless, the Protectorate had various strengths and weaknesses. An evident strength of the Protectorate was the aim to achieve a civilian based government as shown in Source 3, where Cromwell did attempt to "make parliament representative" as well as to give Parliament "a genuine role in the constitution". The system of government was fairly stable, under the Instrument of Government, both Parliament and Protector were to control the militia and a provision was made for parliaments to be elected every three years and had to sit for a minimum of three years. In addition, the Protector had to rule with the Council of State, particularly in key matters such as finance, appointment of senior ministers. Furthermore, the Humble Petition and Advice accepted in May 1657 represented a compromise between the Protector and Parliament. ...read more.


The Protectorate narrowed its support by restricting the franchise to those who were 21yrs old and had property. The Commonwealth men opposed the single person element in government and felt Parliament did not enough power, and Cromwell was "accused of being both a hypocrite and a turn-coat". In addition, royalists generally opposed the regime, particularly when the Decimation Tax was introduced as it alienated them further. The military element of the regime was resented by the gentry. Therefore, it seems Cromwell "got the worst of both worlds", in that there were conflicting interests and aims, the "excessive demands of others" hindered Cromwell to "bring democracy to its head". b) Using all the evidence of the sources, and your own knowledge, explain how far you agree that "The stability and survival of the Protectorate from 1653-1658 was wholly dependent on Oliver Cromwell himself". It is evident that Cromwell was an ambitious and industrious character; he became Lord Protector out of the "desire to prevent mischief and evil" rather than to "serve...as a King", this he made clear in his speech to the Second Protectorate Parliament in 1657, Source 4. Therefore, Cromwell wanted to lead "as a constable", however Cromwell had become more involved and although he wanted to "keep the peace of the parish", more than that as Lord Protector, he wanted to achieve his personal vision of the 'rule of Saints'. ...read more.


Although, the Protectorate was fairly dependent on Cromwell, Parliament also contributed significantly to the regime, the proposal of the Humble Petition and Advice in 1657 was an attempt to create more checks and balances and to balance power. Cromwell did need to work with Parliament, as he needed the approval of Parliament in order to make the regime legal. Therefore, the "stability and survival of the Protectorate" did very much so depend on Cromwell, as suggested by Cyril Robinson, she identifies that the Protectorate was no longer able to survive after Cromwell's death, because "the Protector himself had been to strong". On the contrary, Michael Lynch believes that Cromwell never actually "pushed his authority to the point where he had a genuine controlling power". However, there is agreement in that Cromwell did attempt to achieve "effective civilian government" and that "religious difficulties were in a large measure overcome". But, it needs to be taken into account that as Cyril Robinson is a Whig historian, this school of thought portray as Cromwell as a strong dictator, which is not necessarily a bad criticism. Overall, the Protectorate was dependent on Oliver Cromwell, but not necessarily "wholly", because Cromwell did have to work with Parliament in order to achieve a settlement. But, the Protectorate did heavily rely on Cromwell's personality and political as well as military skills. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the United Kingdom Parliament is sovereign. Consider both legal ...

    Furthermore, in law the courts are duty bound to follow legislation, and it has been suggested that perhaps the courts have a more passive role in applying and interpreting legislation. Legally, this may be true, and in fact Dicey has even stated that a law binding future Parliament's would be valid.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Parnell as a leader of the Irish cause.

    After Gladstone warned the Land League in a public speech that "the resources of civilisation are not yet exhausted", Parnell denounced Gladstone badly. This led to his arrest and imprisonment in Kilmainham gaol, on the grounds that he was deliberately attacking and disparaging the Land Act.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Pluralism in domestic politics

    of human nature is that the individual can learn, change and progress. The constant evolution of human nature has led to the development of a complicated structure of groups of individuals who have different roles in the societies they live in.

  2. To what extent was religion the main causeOf rebellion in the reign of Henry ...

    So, the English people started to attack European and some reformed Bishops in their complaints. However, it was most likely that the gentry were the ones who brought up the names, as the commoners would not of heard of these 'radical' people.

  1. Critically evaluate the impact of the National Lottery since its inception on the arts ...

    Helen Buchanan, (2004) the head teacher of a local Salford primary school claimed "the Lowry has changed many of her young pupils lives", which is hard evidence of the impact the lottery funding within the arts is having on the communities of England.

  2. Using the evidence of Sources 2, 3 and 5, and your own knowledge explain ...

    This is much supported by Source 2, where the offer of the crown was important to Cromwell's "judgement" and "conscience". In Cromwell's speech to the Parliament's commissioners he states the reason as to why he rejects the crown, the principal reason being the "the Providence of God", this was related

  1. Chartist aims and methods - Source related study.

    The source does suggest that a Chartist rebellion would be likely. Source G, an extract from the autobiography of General Charles Napier, is perhaps the most useful source in answering this question. It is not likely to be bias, as Napier was very sympathetic towards the 'poor' Chartists.

  2. Outline the main principles of the Constitution.

    In cases like these, where written constitutions are binding, disputes have to be settled by the courts - giving unelected judges a significant political role. This is not only undemocratic, but go against the whole principle of the constitution. Finally, when there is no codified constitution to begin with, it is difficult to begin to implement one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work