Was it the Failures of the Provisional Government or the skills of Lenin that enabled the Bolsheviks to take control in 1917?

Authors Avatar

Mitul Patel 5P

Was it the Failures of the Provisional Government or the skills of Lenin that enabled the Bolsheviks to take control in 1917?

In 1917 the Russian Tsar Nicolas II abdicated leaving the Provisional Government in charge. However the provisional government were no better than the Tsar and Russia’s economy continued to decline. Later that year in October 1917 the Bolsheviks seized power from the Provisional Government led by Kerensky. Some historians see the revolution as a united working class led by Lenin but others see this as inevitable due to the failings of the Provisional Government.

                Source H says it was the failing of the Provisional Government and it appears to give a clear account mentioning lots of well known problems. The author talks about there being “robberies and housebreakings” and food becoming scarcer “week by week” He also talks about there being only “milk for half the babies in the city” and food such as chocolate and sugar being sold on the black market. On the other hand the author John Reed is pro Bolshevik and is likely to bias it towards the Soviets en more likely as he had published a book in all languages for at Lenin’s orders.

Join now!

               This is backed up by source I which shows that the bread rations fell dramatically where in March a manual worker was given 675g of bread a day and by October this had fallen to just 110g per day. The provisional government was in charge so they were blamed as they were refusing to take Russia out of the war.

              Source G also shows that the Provisional Government was weak as it describes the widespread desertion. The Russian officer says “for hundreds of miles one can ...

This is a preview of the whole essay