• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was it the Failures of the Provisional Government or the skills of Lenin that enabled the Bolsheviks to take control in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was it the Failures of the Provisional Government or the skills of Lenin that enabled the Bolsheviks to take control in 1917? In 1917 the Russian Tsar Nicolas II abdicated leaving the Provisional Government in charge. However the provisional government were no better than the Tsar and Russia's economy continued to decline. Later that year in October 1917 the Bolsheviks seized power from the Provisional Government led by Kerensky. Some historians see the revolution as a united working class led by Lenin but others see this as inevitable due to the failings of the Provisional Government. Source H says it was the failing of the Provisional Government and it appears to give a clear account mentioning lots of well known problems. ...read more.

Middle

Source G also shows that the Provisional Government was weak as it describes the widespread desertion. The Russian officer says "for hundreds of miles one can see deserters" who are in "high spirits, certain they will not be punished" as "authority and obedience no longer exists" The officer is likely to be lying as it is an official letter to the Provisional government and not a piece of propaganda. So far the sources have clearly indicated that it is the failure of the Provisional Government that allowed the Bolsheviks to take control unlike the next two sources which say it was also the weakness of the Provisional Government but this time indirectly. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source D appears to give a balanced view of the events which says that Lenin "had a greater impact on the course [of the revolution] than anyone else" though "great changes are not brought by individuals". He also says that there were "other mighty factors at work in Russia in 1917" such as the Provisional Governments inability to solve Russia's problems. Source K also appears to give a balanced viewpoint despite the fact it was written by Trotsky who was one of the leaders of the Bolshevik party. Trotsky's account makes it look like that Lenin was the person who did most the work and worked out how to take over Petrograd. He does however admit that the Bolsheviks only had to mount two small machine guns because of the lack of resistance from the Provisional Government. ?? ?? ?? ?? Mitul Patel 5P ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning

    lot easier for the provisional government to survive as less pressure would of been on them from opposition. This strengthens the point that the provisional government were not doomed to failure from the beginning and were brought down by outside factors.

  2. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    The government did not have a loyal army to help enforce it's power. This left a power vacuum, allowing the country to enter a civil war. This caused the government to forfeit all of the support it received before the 1917 Revolution.

  1. Gun control

    If gun control is not regulated, our future might even end up like the movie, The War of the Worlds. Our world will be corroded and dismantled. If most of the population owned guns, gun users will shoot freely and possibly kill innocent people.

  2. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    as a result of French loans. (After signing the Dual Alliance with France in 1893, Russia was provided with huge French loans for industrial development.) The state took the leading role in building up, financing and managing nearly all the new industries.

  1. Why were there two revolutions in 1917?

    There was, however, very little tension between the two groups as they had realised the necessity of co-operation with each other.

  2. Was the collapse of the provisional government inevitable

    The army also disintegrated as they were sent to fight the war, and because of the lack of army in the cities, the cities had general lawlessness and there was a widespread of violence. The Kadets and Octobrists did not alter their views on the war once they came to control the Provisional Government.

  1. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    Lenin's return was a remarkable event. In the hope that the tsar's fall would be the prelude to the collapse of Russian armies, the German government arranged for Lenin to return to Russia In a sealed train across occupied Europe.

  2. Explain why the Bolsheviks were successful in October 1917.

    were used for moving ammunitions from one place to another, instead of goods. The cost of living increased rapidly between 1914 and 1917. Many basic necessities increased in price, for example black bread (peasant bread) increased by 500%, soap by 780%, and firewood by 1100%.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work