• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Provisional Government doomed to failure?

Extracts from this document...


Was the Provisional Government doomed to failure? In February 1917 a revolution took place in Russia, resulting in the abdication of the Tsar and the rise to power of the new Provisional Government which was made up members of the old Duma. However, the Provisional Government came to power at a time of great unrest within the country, and further events led to its downfall within a matter of months. It is necessary to discuss whether the Provisional Government was doomed from its inception as a result of the situation it was placed in, or if it was responsible for its own demise. It is important, first of all, to examine the Provisional Government itself. As stated already, the Provisional Government was in fact the last remaining Duma before the tsar was forced to step down from power. Unfortunately, by this time, the tsar had taken control of who became members of the Duma and it was now made up of 'yes-men' who agreed with the tsar and were willing to fulfil his needs. This immediately rendered the Provisional Government quite weak, as they were clearly inexperienced in decision-making, and did not understand, nor sympathise with, the cares and needs of the people of Russia. When the Provisional Government came to power, there were large areas of difficulty it had to contend with, and its handling of these matters had a large effect on the authority it exercised over the country, and both lost and gained support from the people. Possibly the largest problem was the fact that the Provisional Government was made up of so many different groups and parties, all of which had their own sub-divisions. These groups all had their own opinions and policies, and views which stretched from the far right wing, to the far left, and everywhere in between. The liberals included groups such as the Kadets, who were the dominant liberal force in the Provisional Government, and the Octobrists, who were slightly more right wing. ...read more.


This issue emphasised the split in the Provisional Government as the liberals did not want the old empire to be broken up, maintaining the integrity of the state, while the Socialists wanted to accede to the national aspirations of non-Russian people, offering more self-government and local control; in particular, they wanted to grant self-government to the Ukraine. While other nationalities such as the Poles and the Finns called out for independence after the abdication of the Tsar, the biggest problem lay in the Ukraine, an area of immense value to the Russians, containing the most valuable farmland in the old empire and very near the Front. The Ukrainians demanded self-determination and the moderate socialists in the government made concessions to them, which out raged the liberals who saw it as the first step towards the break up of Russia. They believed that for Russia to remain a great power, it had to keep all the regions together as one centrally governed state. The true problem here stems all the way back to time of the Tsar, when the practice of Russification was enforced. As a result of this oppression, where people of different nationalities were forced to live as Russians, speak Russian, and support the Russian Orthodox Church, and many were prosecuted (especially the Jews and Muslims) a great deal of resentment had built up among the different minorities. Possibly the best decision would have been to hold a plebiscite for each of the different regions, asking the people whether or not they wished to become independent, or remain part of the Russian empire. If they had chosen to become independent, they would be given a five-year trial to prove they could survive both economically and politically without Russia's influence. However, because of the fact that the Provisional Government was split over the issue, and different sides were making decisions without informing the others, it only succeeded in pulling the government further and further apart, and losing the confidence of the Russian people. ...read more.


Lenin swiftly gained support, taking away from the provisional government what little support and authority it had left. The October Revolution highlighted the Provisional Government's complete demise as the Bolsheviks were able to seize the city of Petrograd in the face of sparse opposition. The failure of the Government to rally effective military support in its hour of need was symptomatic of its much deeper political failure over the past eight months. Kerensky's government could not generate any genuine enthusiasm - its support had evaporated. The Bolsheviks were pushing at 'an already open door'. It is clear from all the points listed above that the Provisional Government were not going to survive for long. However the question is whether or not it was doomed from the start. The Provisional Government started out on very shaky ground as a result of severe rifts within the government parties, and factions within the political groups themselves, as well as the fact that it came about at a time when there was much discontent among the Russian people for various reasons, and most of the peoples' support was going towards the Petrograd Soviet. Later events did make things worse but if the government had not been so guilty of procrastination, and had held the elections for a Constituent Assembly straight away, it would have made the decisions necessary to keep the people happy. This though, was obviously not achieved. It must be remembered that the Provisional Government was never meant to last. As its very name implied, it was a temporary body, to be approved or removed at an early date by a Constituent Assembly which was to settle the country's permanent form of government and constitution. At its formation the Government already suffered from two main weaknesses - that being the fact that it lacked legitimate authority and also that any authority it had was limited by its unofficial partnership with the Petrograd Soviet. This, therefore, is firm evidence for the fact that it was doomed from the outset and events further along the line certainly supported this. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning

    Russia economy was drained due to the war. Agriculture was the biggest provider of income and due to resources and soldiers being used in war, it could not run efficiently. The provisional government could have chosen to end Russia's participation in the war. However chose to continue the war and drain Russia even more economically.

  2. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    This caused each side to bring out their own armies and prepare for civil war. The liberals brought out the old Tsarist Army to fight the Bolsheviks. The ideology between the dual powers was almost illusionary, because it forced the cooperation of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat7.

  1. The colonial factor in the Nigerian civil war (1967-1970)

    The flurry of conciliatory meetings achieved nothing. As early as 7 June 1966, after the May incident in the North, Ojukwu was quoted as saying: "We are finished with the Federation. It is all a question of time." Ojukwu seized the Federal Government property and funds in the East.

  2. Did Democracy Survive in Britain in the 1930's as a Result of the Policies ...

    The National Government was also re-elected at that time winning 432 seats, and Baldwin became Prime Minister. In 1936 the B.U.F. changes it's tactics with the Cable Street March that took place on Sunday October 4, 1936 in Cable Street in the East End of London.

  1. To what extent was the Great War responsible for the collapse of the Provisional ...

    Therefore, though the Great War did present fundamental problems the government did nothing to better their own situation. The policies of the Provisional Government came from its Prime Minister, whom the historians have had varying views on. What is known as the Provisional Government was actually four successive governments that became more left orientated as it changed.

  2. It was the weakness of the provisional government that brought the October revolution about ...

    In July 1917, Kerensky became war minister. Although staying in the war was a contributor to the weakness of the provisional government, Kerensky; through his strong personality, determination and skill at speaking, gave the government strength. Arguably the largest factor in the public unrest was the fact that the Provisional

  1. What difficulties beset the Provisional Government? The Provisional Government never enjoyed widespread support. After ...

    Soviets had been set up all over the country. They claimed that, as their members were elected by the workers, they represented the will of the people more faithfully than the Provisional Government. They certainly enjoyed more popularity and support.

  2. The Mexican Economy

    Mexico's gross domestic product (GDP) increased by 6.5 percent annually during the period from 1965 to 1980 but only 0.5 percent yearly during 1980 to 1988. Weak oil prices, rising inflation, a foreign debt of more than $100 billion, and worsening budget deficits exacerbated the nation's economic problems in the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work