'We have made Italy, now we must make Italians' How successful had the Liberal Government been in creating a united and prosperous Italy by 1914

Authors Avatar

Sam Coleman                                                                                                              AS HISTORY

Assessment Task 1:

‘We have made Italy, now we must make Italians’

How successful had the Liberal Government been in creating a united

and prosperous Italy by 1914

The Liberals had achieved some successes by 1914. The Liberals had held Italy together for 40 years; they had to be doing something right. They had provided education to the masses (adult illiteracy in the north had fallen from 42.1% in 1871 to 11% in 1911) and exerted control over the industrialisation of the country. Opportunities created had pulled the majority of Italians from poverty that had hindered them for generations before 1914. Unemployment in the south had been greatly reduced and wages improved as a result. Giolitti (either as Prime Minister, or from behind the scenes) had supported co-operatives and other working classes into passing new laws and legislation to improve working conditions and lower food taxes. Giolitti had also introduced international male suffrage for those over thirty in 1912. Giolitti had achieved great support and admiration.         However the government still faced problems. Italy was still a backward and disunited state. There was a large gap in the north-south equality issue. By 1911 adult illiteracy in the north was 11% compared to 65.3% in the south. This gap had continued to grow prior to 1911. This distance approach enforced by the government had upset many people, particularly revolutionaries, who saw the need for modernisation. People had become used to a backward and corrupt government.    

Join now!

Italy had finally been united as one kingdom in 1870, with a constitution based on the model of a parliamentary monarchy. Its parliamentary constitution comprised of the Senate and Chamber of Deputies. The Senate, which had its members appointed on a lifetime basis by the King, was usually the less active, if only because of the advanced age of most of its members. The Chamber, elected every five years, was the more powerful of the two houses for, although government ministers were appointed and could be dismissed by the King, they were usually drawn from the Chamber. However the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay