• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Weimar Republic governments were remarkably successful in dealing with the economic and political problems that they faced 1919-23" Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Weimar Republic governments were remarkably successful in dealing with the economic and political problems that they faced 1919-23" Do you agree? When the Republic was first 'born' in 1919 they faced a huge amount of problems - both internal and external. Not only did they have a remarkably unstable government, but also faced threats from both the left and the right. Furthermore to this their economic problems were extremely acute. Historians such as Stephen Lee believe that the government "emerged by 1924 with a stability that suggested reasonable success". Whether this is to be taken as true or not, it cannot necessarily be taken as true that the government were responsible for creating that stability. To decipher their role in stabilising events between 1919-23 it is necessary to look at each problem individually and asses the governments role and the outcome of these events. At the very heart of problems was the fact that the government was remarkably unstable. Hannah Vogt believes that 'the men who were to pick up the reins of government faced a tremendous, thankless task'. With this in mind it is obvious the need for a stable government was great, as they were not to be given much support from others they should at least obtain it from themselves! Their first stumbling block was the constitution and voting system. The constitution, though well thought out and well meaning, had one fatal flaw: article 48. ...read more.

Middle

However the army were quick to act and hundreds were killed as the Reichswehr restored normality. There is little success or control in this action, merely brutality. Also extremely significant were the Right wing uprisings, including the Kapp Putsch. Both General Von Luttwitz and Wolfgang Kapp strongly disagreed to the army cuts the government had agreed to by signing the treaty of Versailles. The men of the Balitkum Brigade and also a Brigade led by Hermann Ehrhardt (who were due to be disbanded) joined with members of the Freikorps, making their numbers up to 12,000 men. They then chose to march through the Brandenburg gates and Kapp planned to become chancellor. The Reichstag members were forced to flee to Bresden and then to Stuttgart. Although the army was not in support of the Putsch, they refused to act. General Von Seeckt claimed, "Reichswehr does not fire on Reichswehr". Before leaving, Ebert and Bauer had urged the workers to strike. "No factory must work while the military dictatorship of Ludendorff and the others rule. Down your tools! Come out on strike! Fight with all means for the Republic" This proved very effective. There was no water, electric, gas, or public transport. Civil servants would not follow Kapps orders and the banks would give him no money. After only 4 days it collapsed. "in reality, the putsch had been mistimed, badly planned and failed to muster anything like to expected support. ...read more.

Conclusion

The French tried to deport those who tried to strike, and 150 workers were killed. During and after the invasion of the Ruhr there was massive inflation. In 1914 �1 was worth 20marks, by 1919 it had risen to 250 marks. However there is great debate as to what caused this inflation. Synder claims that, "the entire problem was closely connected with the reparations demanded by the allies". Stephen Lee believes that "the dramatic collapse of the mark was the direct result of this occupation [of the Ruhr] and the passive resistance to it". There is then another argument from Kolb who believes "the governments passiveness in the matter of currency stabilisation is no doubt to be interpreted as part of its strategy over reparations". Synder rejects this view as "incorrect and unjust" He maintains that "the process of inflation was already under way when the French occupied the Ruhr". No matter which Historians version you choose to believe the governments coping methods can be judged similarly. Looking at Stephen Lee and Kolb's argument the government's actions can be seen as pitiless. Looking at the results of their action i.e. loss of German life and the huge inflation it was a merciless and selfish act. By looking at Synder's view, it should have been obvious to the government that a general strike would only further aggravate the problem of inflation. From looking at the problems faced by the Republic, and the way in which they dealt with them, it can be said that whilst they managed to get through them, this was mainly through either sheer force or luck. Mhairi B Thomson Word count: 1929 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was Northumberland more successful in solving mid Tudor political problems than ...

    He set up a Royal Commission to investigate this income, attempting to enhance the efficiency of revenue collection, and eliminating corruption in the realm's five revenue courts. The commission reported astonishingly quickly, a tribute to the administrative efficiency involved. The huge benefits this policy brought, unfortunately, would not have an effect until Mary's reign.

  2. Why was the Weimar Republic able to survive the difficulties between 1919-23?

    However, there is truth in the claim that certain clauses caused anger towards anything related to the Treaty. The main two clauses responsible for this sentiment were the 'War Guilt' clause, as many Germans did not feel solely responsible for the Great War, and the hugely restricted army which had

  1. In what ways did the Treaty of Versailles pose a threat to the Weimar ...

    Any revolts from the KPD failed due to inadequate leadership and the freikorps and army crushed any serious uprising from the left. The rise of Extremism made the coalition government weak as it had to work with discontented minority parties and decisions became extremely difficult.

  2. Weimar Germany 1918-23: Was the Weimar Republic Doomed to Failure?

    as a country. President Friederich Ebert stated in 'The Political Institutions of the German Revolution'; "There is no alternative to accepting the armistice terms. It is, however, already apparent that these conditions will not produce a just peace. The sacrifices imposed upon us are tremendous, they must lead to our peoples' doom."

  1. The Government's Aim to begin a severe crackdown on knife related crime

    the jeers Gordon Brown was given from the protesters and what he had said in his video message. The headline given to the article instantly captured the attention of the reader because, many people living in London may read the Sunday Times and the mention of London in the headline

  2. Pakistan's Political and Economic Development

    during his time, it grew at a rate of less than 2% compared to rates of 10% during the 'decade of development' in Ayub Khan's time. 'Pakistan's performance during 1970s remained unsatisfactory compared to the 1960s'.12 Zulfiqar Bhutto's lackluster performance can be attributed to his unstable political decisions and his

  1. How successful was the national government in dealing with problems that it faced?

    The numbers of cars doubled and the number of radios trebled. By 1935 British industry was 11% higher than in 1929 due to significant increases in productivity. It is probable true to say that Britain emerged from the depression largely because of factor outside the governments control by 1933 recovery began by itself.

  2. A Critical Evaluation of UK's ID Card schemeA Government's proposal to monitor its Citizens

    * Changes in technological advancement regarding Biometric technology * The benefits that new technology could bring to improve the schemes functionality. MOST ANALYSIS [B] Mission Objectives Strategies Tactics *The ID card aims to provide a secure and stable mechanism for all legitimate UK Citizens and Residents to partake in and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work