• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the Corn Laws Justified?

Extracts from this document...


Adam Wright 19th January 2003 Were the Corn Laws Justified? Plan Yes Distress in areas of agricultural importance, majority of pop not urban, + bankruptcies War food supply Political + social stability- Radicals Vote winner No Starvation instigates political awareness Free market interference-trade war, industrialists, depresses manufactured goods Trio of legislation anti common man The Corn Law was a potentially dangerous bill introduced in 1815 after three years of good harvests. It was instigated with the support of Lord Liverpool the current Prime Minister who saw the Corn Laws as a temporary measure to create stability in the agricultural sector in the immediate post-war years. The Corn Laws were potentially disastrous because they, along with the abolishment of Income tax and the creation of the Game laws, were seen as a return by the ultra-Tory's to a single-issue, single class government. That issue being the wants and needs of the landed classes. I personally believe that the Corn Laws led to large swathes of the urbanised population become unreasonably politicised in their demands to parliament with the catalyst for this potentially revolutionary actions being the starvation of the working classes and thus the Corn Laws. Lord Liverpool's justification for the Corn Laws was the appalling state of agriculture in England in the post war period. England faced a unique set of financial and economic problems bought about by the end of the war. ...read more.


The huge majority of landowners who were in the houses of commons and Lords meant that Lord Liverpool really had little choice in the course of his actions. The make up of the Government of England and the electorate made sure that this law was more than the temporary measure it was designed to be. To many on the outside this rightly looked like a attempt by the agriculturally based land owners to secure their incomes while leaving the poor and the emerging industrialist out in the cold. This Act was a sure vote winner for Liverpool and strengthened the already strong bonds between the landowners and government. Therefore in this sense that Corn Laws were not justified. The landed classes provided justification for not allowing universal male suffrage was that they educated few were the only people responsible enough to look after the needs of the country and all areas of society. The working classes realised due to the Corn Laws, especially in urban centres, that they were being underrepresented and this created the politicisation of the masses. Liverpool set the ball rolling with the corn actions that led to the most serious challenge to the then current English democratic process. In purely a morality sense the corn laws extended period in operation led to many of the under represented Widespread hunger caused by the Corn Laws combined with a general nose dive in the economy which was exasperated by the unique short term financial and economic circumstances ...read more.


Liverpool and his old fashioned inward looking government would not have had the benefit of this hindsight. They didn't know that Britain's heyday as the workshop of the world was on the horizon. Instead they saw a worrying social situation around them and pressured by their counterparts were forced to take action. But the morality of such an action taken in what today would be called a recession or depression is highly questionable and is in my eyes the greatest reason why the Corn Laws were not justified. Parliament as the greatest social organ in a democracy that should have represented the rights of all was in my eyes mistaken in letting their citizens starve for a slim chance of economic recovery in a single sector of the country's economy-agriculture. The British Government had decided to choke one group of citizens, the urban based working classes, to create a wealthier group of large land owners-ironically the largest group of MP's. In my eyes protecting no part of the economy would have been the best idea. No economic area would flourish but neither would any industry be choked. A free market mentality would be painful but would result in more efficient techniques in manufacturing and agriculture. All the Corn Laws seemed to do was underline the injustices that were allowed to happen because of the lack of universal suffrage. It also highlighted how inward looking and self centred the Ultra-Tory's were as well as highlighting urban electoral under representation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    They felt they had to do whatever necessary to stop revolution. The historians that say the country was close to a revolution in the period 1815-1822 tend to emphasise the sheer volume of radical activity during this period.

  2. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    The two key leaders of the Chartist movement were William Lovett and Feargus O'Connor. Lovett and O'Connor did not see eye to eye on the methods that they thought the Chartists should use. Lovett preferred radical and non-violent methods, and emphasised the importance of education, whilst O'Connor believed in a more forceful approach.

  1. Women's Suffrage.

    Matters came to a head in the 1909-10 session of Parliament. A 'Conciliation Bill' giving the vote to women on the same basis as in municipal elections was put forward. H N Brailsford the originator of the bill went to great lengths to impress on Millicent Fawcett and others the

  2. When is government interference with an individual's freedom justified?

    It involves "the non-restriction of options": Benn and Weinstein, 1971. There has been much debate about whether being free to do something without being able to do it constitutes a true freedom. If an individual is free by law to do or be something, but lacks the opportunity or resources

  1. How far were the Anti Corn Law League responsible for Peel's repeal of the ...

    Popular slogans such as "Give us this day our daily bread" challenged the government's moral conscience and Peel's paternalist style of politics would soon be receptive to their cause, in his endeavours to improve the 'condition of England.' Whilst continuously producing propaganda, Bright and Cobden, elected to Parliament could ensure

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    but instead spoke of preserving the integrity of the two Houses of Parliament, the Monarchy and stability; as Gash states it was a 'constitutional and religious not a social and economic policy.'

  1. How Significant An Event Was the Repeal Of The Corn Laws In The History ...

    unwilling to reconsider the new legislation in order to help the economy, the poor or the manufacturers who laid off workers in times of restricted trade. The Whig governments of 1830-4 and 1835-41 were challenged by many different groups of agitators including Chartists, the Anti-Poor Law movement, the Ten Hour movement, and the Anti-Corn Law League.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    To take-off any evidence of other rules in our country, any coat of arms were destroyed and this was considered to be too harsh and eventually lead to political vandalism. Most changes were only promises as there was no time to be carried out and even upset the Maltese people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work