• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the policy intentions of the Thatcher governments assisted or hindered by the structure of the British state?

Extracts from this document...


Were the policy intentions of the Thatcher governments assisted or hindered by the structure of the British state? Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990, Mrs Thatcher had one of the most significant, and controversial, premierships of post-war Britain. She attempted to transform Britain at political, economic and social levels. The Thatcher government considered itself 'a radical government which sought to reverse British decline'1 and Thatcher claimed that 'the balance had be tilted too far in favour of the State at the expense of individual freedom'2. The title contains two key elements: 'policy intentions' and 'the structure of the British state'. The former may be taken as the plan or purpose of the Thatcher governements to achieve their aims. Many of their fundamental objectives were outlined in their 1979 Manifesto. The latter proves more difficult to define precisely. The definition of state, given in 'The Routledge Dictionary of Politics', is 'the whole fixed political system, the set-up of authoritative and legitimately powerful roles by which we are finally controlled, ordered, and organised'3. This is to include primarily Parliament and local government. However, trade unions have represented a large proportion of the British labour force and have been integral to the functioning of the British state, so they shall also be included as part of the structure. Firstly, this essay shall consider the reasoning behind their policies and place the rise of the New Right in context. Secondly, it is necessary to analyse what exactly were their policy intentions before assessing their success. ...read more.


Financial stability was extremely important because the government wished to avoid the recession and potential depression in the 1970s and they recognised that financial stability would give an impression of political competence. Moreover, it was a fundamental principle of monetarism. Much of the shift towards monetarist principles had already occurred under the Wilson-Callaghan government so the Thatcherite policies were not as radical as perhaps suggested. It could also imply that further monetarist policies would meet less resistance from the Opposition. Although not mentioned in the 1979 Manifesto, denationalisation became a crucial part of Thatcherite policy. However, no industry strategy was devised and the restructuring of British industry was left alone by the government. Privatisation involved little consultation with relevant parties before legislation was passed, but was also passed with few amendments. The Thatcher government wanted to increase firms' international competitiveness and transparency. Given the trade unions' power during the 1960s and 1970s, the 1979 Thatcher government was initially very cautious and modest in its approach towards trade union reform. They saw the trade unions as potential obstacles to policies of redundancy and restructuring in order to increase profitability. However, the trade unions proved to be less of a hindrance to policy intentions than initially thought. Their blanket immunity was removed in 1982 and other immunities were also reduced. According to the 1990 Employment Act trade unions could be held responsible for unauthorized strike action unless they categorically opposed it. Trade unions had little impact on policy and the few consultations they had with the government were effectively futile. ...read more.


Profound social change was important to the government in fulfilling their policy intentions. Although not directly part of the state, social attitudes of the electorate can influence discussion and debate within Parliament and other elements of the State. The government had already proved that it could control Parliament but in order to carry out its policies, it needed electoral support to be re-elected. In conclusion, the Thatcher government met relatively little resistance to its policy intentions throughout its time in office. The electoral system and the ineffectual Labour Party meant that legislation was hardly questioned before it was passed, assisting Thatcher Governments' policy intentions. Trade Unions did not hinder the Government as regularly as might have been expected and, following legislation, retreated from political debate which arguably assisted the Thatcher Governments. Local government did hinder policy intentions because they were increasingly incensed by central government policy and did not cooperate easily. Either as a result of existing conditions or due to Government manipulation, policy intentions were generally unhindered. However, this did not guarantee policy success, which was affected by wider socio-economic and global factors as well. 1 The Free Economy and The Strong State, The Politics of Thatcherism. A Gamble, Page 121 2 The Free Economy and The Strong State, The Politics of Thatcherism. A Gamble, Page 121 3 The Routledge Dictionary Of Politics, David Robertson, Page 457 4 The Free Economy and The Strong State, The Politics of Thatcherism. A Gamble, Page 121 5 Thatcherism, ed. Robert Skidelsky. Chapter One - Has the electorate become more Thatcherite, I Crewe. Jessica Mead 10/05/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What Are The Key Elements Of Thatcherism? To What Extent Was It A Reaction ...

    The conservatives then coined the phrase "free economy, strong state." The new style of government which Thatcher adopted also had a big impact on what is now known as Thatcherism. Kavanagh argued in 1990 that Thatchers individual contribution to British politics can be described under four headings.

  2. "The British Parliament is weak whereas the US Congress is powerful." Discuss.

    Although it is possible for presidents to enact their own agendas, Congress often frustrates the will of the president, especially in times of divided government - when the president's party is not in control of one or both houses of Congress.

  1. Why Did the Post-war Consensus Breakdown?

    First, the Conservative defeat resulted in a serious reconsideration of policy which eventually resulted in Margaret Thatcher's New Right social market strategy. And second, Labour came to power just as a series of domestic and world economic crises were about to break out.

  2. "In the two decades before the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War, a profound ...

    V. Old Colonial Government a. The British colonies were settled without any particular plan. They received little direction form the imperial government. b. The crown never developed administrative measures over the colonies. c. Colonial problems received little attention in Britain. While colonial governors might have provided the needed strength and stability for imperial administration, they

  1. What did the post-war consensus in British politics amount to? Why did it ...

    It is not by coincidence that, after its nadir immediately after the war, the Liberal party began a slow journey back to a respectable share of the vote in the 1960s and 70s: middle-of-the-road electors did not like the two major parties drifting away from the centre.

  2. The Uk policy making process.

    Again, astute lobbyists will certainly target the members of these committees and make sure to keep them updated about relevant issues. Civil Service I want to say a little about the Civil Service, because it is here that much of the detailed thinking about government policy is conducted.

  1. The Negative Impact Of World War 1 On Italy: Weaknesses Of The Liberal State, ...

    The country was in chaos. Liberalism was more irrelevant than ever as its support base had collapsed in favour of the PSI, PPI and now the Fascists - all parties that had little love for Liberal Italy. Even worse, the Fascist squadrismo increasingly dictated events in some provinces through violence.

  2. The Creation of the Welfare State

    The third giant was 'Disease' this was tackling major health issues, the fourth giant was 'Squalor' this was to show people living in dirty, unhealthy environment, the last one was 'Idleness' this giant was made up of sheer laziness and not having the desire to work.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work