• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the devolution process in Scotland and Wales?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the devolution process in Scotland and Wales? Devolution as described by Bogdanor is the delegation of power to local or regional administration, so power is dispersed from a superior to an inferior political authority, or to be more precise it consists of a sub-ordinate elected body on a geographical basis of functions at present exercised by Parliament. It is possible to trace the origins of the move towards greater self- government in Scotland and Wales as far back as the nineteenth century. Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland were promised a devolved assembly by the labour Party in the 1997 elections. Referendums were held in 1997, soon after the general election. In the event just over 60% of Scots voted which was just enough to give the vote authority. However in Wales voter turnout was just over 50% and this had the effect of reducing the authority of the referendum. However both countries came out with a majority in favour of devolution and the Scotland and Wales Acts were passed in 1998. There have been many advantages to devolution. In Scotland the nature of politics has changed positively since the introduction of devolution. It has brought government closer to the people of Scotland in that Scots feel more engaged with the political process, whereas before decisions were made for them in Westminster hundreds of miles away. ...read more.

Middle

Local issues are represented better than could be done at Westminster and steps can be taken in order to solve them. Both Scotland and Wales have been given responsibilities over local affairs such as healthcare, education, housing and transport. This has produced two advantages; it helps to lighten the workload on Westminster allowing more time to be spent on English issues and foreign affairs. It has also meant that local parliament would be able to focus on specific areas in order to improve conditions. By 2003 Scotland had introduced forty pieces of legislation that would only apply to Scotland, such as no tuition fees and free elderly care. Wales have also introduced new policies like the introduction of the Baccalaureate system of education as well as the banning of school league tables and SAT tests for seven year olds. This shows that devolution has had a positive effect and has lead to effective self-government. Also local people are more likely to accept new legislation if it has come from a more local source that understands their position better. Devolution has shown an increase in democracy as the Scottish and Welsh people have been given more say in matters that could affect them. The Scottish opposed a 'Beef on the bone ban' in 1999 that could have caused problems for Scottish farmers and the Welsh opposed the growth of GM crops because they feared the risk of cross pollination with their crops. ...read more.

Conclusion

There have been arguments about devolution in relation to it being seen by Scottish Nationalist as a stepping stone to independence. Before the UK general election the Conservative Party said that devolution would create a 'slippery slope' to Scottish independence and provide the SNPs with a route to power. John Major claimed that the Parliament could end '1000 years of British history'. The equally pro-Union Labour Party met these criticisms by claiming that devolution would fatally undermine the SNP, and remedy the long-felt desire of Scots for a measure of self-government. In practice the Tory fears have proved unfounded. Even after the SNPs gained a majority in the Scottish parliament after 2007 there has been no further surge towards independence. Support for the Scottish Nationalist Party has decreased as Scotland can now handle their own affairs and are over represented at Westminster. In Wales this issue is not as pressing because it is obvious that Wales could not cope independently so devolution has just allowed them to have some responsibility in handling their own affairs and reduced the workload at Westminster. To conclude, there are advantages and disadvantages to the devolution process in Scotland and Wales but mostly devolution has been effective. It has lead to a more effective government because Welsh and Scottish people have far more of a say in issues that concern them and it has decreased the support for independence in both countries. Kate Manson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Describe the process by which MPs are elected to Westminster. What are the ...

    4 star(s)

    Many will also argue that this political stability is due to the fact that there are only two strong parties within the Parliament, one in charge of the government and the other acting as the opposition.

  2. Referendums. Although Referendums can provide clear decisive answers on difficult political issues, they also ...

    they also allow politicians to absolve themselves of responsibility for making difficult decisions, as referendums are the "people's choice". The government also abuses this system of resolving issues as it will a referendum when they are confident of a positive result (they think they will win).

  1. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    Many people within the UK are not worried by the breaking down of the traditional union of the United Kingdom, and would actively seek a form of devolved local government. With apathy growing, a more decentralised system of government may encourage voters and more political participation.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of federalism in the USA?

    Another important advantage of federal system in USA is the cooperation within the country. By the power of the 16th Amendment, "the federal government has the ability to generate significant amounts of revenue."5 Because of that the federal government has to assist state and local governments in terms of finances,

  1. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    Unlike the English legal system, the Scottish system has depended more on the principles of continental jurisprudence derived from Roman law than on indigenous common law. Whenever a piece of legislation has been intended to apply to Scotland as well as to England and Wales this has had to be

  2. Critically evaluate the impact of the National Lottery since its inception on the arts ...

    All these programmes have been extremely effective and have continuously impacted the arts in England by allowing individuals and organisations a chance to pursue their chosen art form with financial backing. This backing would be substantially less had the National Lottery not been introduced.

  1. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    The party had a number of study groups most leftist and they were opposed to non-Burmese domination over Burma's economy. Like all Burmese parties, the Thakins hated the Indian community in Burma but it had great respect for the Indian National Congress and its leaders like Gandhi.

  2. The advantages of the Uk having a constitutional monarchy are greater than the disadvantages. ...

    The power should be handed over to the elected representatives. Monarchy in this situation plays an unpopular role. However, I still want to argue that the UK is a large country and different people hold quite different view on the same thing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work