• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What factors account for variation in the types of party system to be found in different European countries?

Extracts from this document...


What factors account for variation in the types of party system to be found in different European countries? G. Sartori defines a party system as "the system of interactions resulting from inter-party competition." That is, what parties exist, and how they behave to one another. Jean Blondel believes that the analysis of West European party systems would require a consideration of the number of parties, of their strength, and their place on the political spectrum.1 The number of parties indicates whether one party can legislate alone or form coalitions with others, and can also indicate how politically divided the party system is.2 So, in a two-party (or majority-electing system), two, or perhaps more, parties compete for seats but the two major parties win the vast majority of seats. This is true of the UK. In a multi-party system, it is normal to have some sort of coalition government because no party has a majority in the legislature. This is true of Germany. Often, the number of parties in the system is a result of the electoral system. The electoral system will be discussed as a factor causing the variation in party systems later in the essay. The second consideration is the strength of parties. In western democracies, two-party systems show relative stability and a pendulum effect between the two main parties. ...read more.


Also in the UK, there tended to be a north-south divide on the basis of class, although the distinction is not so clear in the present day. In Britain post-World War II, there was evidently working-class and middle-class. Today, due to the rise in the service sector and self-employment, and the decline in the manufacturing industry, there is a rapidly expanding middle-class.7 Despite the evolution of the traditional "old" Labour Party, which mainly represented the working class, into a bigger catch-all party, it can be argued that voting patterns in the UK are still based for many on social class. However, it can be argued that there is weakening partisanship with regard to the two main parties (Labour and Conservative), due to dissatisfaction and the opinion that there is little difference between them.8 In Germany, both the CDU/CSU and SPD are increasingly centrist and aim to appeal to the wider electorate. This has not always been the case, as the SPD was officially a socialist worker's party until 1959. The long period of CDU/CSU dominance during the post-war "economic miracle" in West Germany made it difficult for the SPD, who were officially anti-capitalism, to gain votes, and they were forced to move towards the centre after dropping their Marxist character in 1959. ...read more.


For example, the class cleavage is still fairly significant in Britain, and this is reflected by the establishment of the Labour Party (traditionally the party of the working class) in the early twentieth century, and the development of the Tory Party into the Conservative Party, which traditionally represented the upper and increasingly middle class voters. Also in Germany, the SPD remains the party of the majority of the working class, whereas the CDU/CSU enjoys more support from the middle classes. In the UK, this ideological division and the first past the post electoral system has led to the development of a two-party system. In Germany, it is more the electoral system that has affected the party system, because its additional member system (a proportional representation system) means that seats are allocated according to votes. As is often the case with a proportional system, it is very hard in Germany to gain an overall majority. It has only happened once, when the CDU/CSU managed it in 1957.13 Electoral systems, majoritarian and proportional, do account for much of the variation in party systems across western Europe. Cleavages can be quite influential but they do also lose their saliency, and this, along with changes in the nature of the electorate and social values in each country, means that party systems in West European countries vary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What are the main differences between 'liberal democratic', 'authoritarian' and 'totalitarian' political systems?

    Another important difference between liberal democratic and authoritarian system is the economy. A liberal democracy has a free economy whereas in both authoritarian and totalitarian systems the state operates very close control over the economy and the individual countries operate very independently of others, using mainly domestic resources.

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    It refers to the theology that legitimised the apartheid state. 11 G.C. Oosthuizen, J.K Coetzee, J.W. de Gruchy, J.H. Hofmeyr and B.C. Lategan, Religion, Intergroup Relations, and Social Change in South Africa: Humans Sciences Research Council, (Connecticut: Greenwood Press 1988), p13 bracketed phrase is an addition.

  1. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    This was because after three decades of failure bourgeois nationalism was weak and exhausted and unlikely to gain the support of the masses any more. They lacked social contact with the people and the almost complete absence of any social programme the middle class organisations were not in the position to compete successfully with the communists.

  2. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    Conservatives favoured private sector enterprise and the Labour Party favoured the public sector, with high levels of state intervention and provision. Each party interpreted their social and economic policies according to these ideological ideas and therefore they always had differences in their policies.

  1. Party system in India

    Thus this period was marked by greater competition among parties and also by greater instability within many parties. 1989 onwards 1989 marked the collapse of the Congress dominance at the national level, and it never recovered afterwards. In terms of its presence in the Lok Sabha, the Congress for the

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    Dynamics Angola's fourth civil war gathered strong momentum from July 1998, with UNITA making extensive advances from the outset. Immediately UNITA captured 68 areas that it had ceded to the government during the peace process. There was escalation of violence throughout the country; the most horrendous of which was

  1. "The UK is a two party system" - does this comment still apply today?

    regionalised democracy even further and has resulted in the emergence of small nationalist parties such as the SNP in Scotland, Sinn Fein in Northern Ireland and Plaid Cymru in Wales, which have nope chance of holding government in Westminster but do receive a great deal of local support.

  2. With reference to material you have studied discuss the major policy differences between the ...

    The party believe that Education must be fully funded and pre-school nursery education must receive more government support. Furthermore the SDLP do not recognise the need for grammar schools and therefore have campaigned for the abolishment of the 11+.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work