• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What immigration policy should Britain have?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Year 11 Citizenship What immigration policy should Britain have? There are many reasons why people may want to come and live in Britain. For example Britain is a wealthy country and because of its wealth people want to come to live in Britain so that they can earn more money and escape poverty or just seek out a better life for themselves and perhaps their family. Not only Britain's wealth attracts people but also the fact that there is no current war in Britain or persecution for political or religious beliefs so Britain can also be seen as a safe haven as people are free to believe what they want to, within reason and there political opinion isn't disregarded. Unemployment is a factor that effects a lot of countries even Britain and even though unemployment isn't very low in Britain but if you are able to get a job the pay is in most cases far higher than that of their country of origin. The British government has to decide what kind of immigration policy we should have. There are a number of possibilities. Firstly, the government could have an 'open border' policy. The definition of 'open border' is this - * An open border is a border that allows unrestricted entry and exit. An open territorial border allows the unrestricted movement of persons and goods for any purpose. ...read more.

Middle

Other people who are already living in Britain could create protests and riots saying because Britain are just allowing skilled people and this means that they are taking all the jobs because they are more skilled than other people who are already residents in Britain. Another possibility is to adopt a policy of 'one in, one out'. This means that the number of people coming into the country should broadly equal the number of people who leave the country. The advantages of this policy are that the population of the country wouldn't change from immigrants coming into the count instead they would come in making no difference to the population of the country. This would limit the amount of immigrants coming into the country which means that less paperwork would have to be carried out to make the migrant a proper UK citizen because there is less immigrants coming into the UK, saving a lot of money that goes into making migrants official citizens. However the problem is that far more people want to come into the country than want to leave so people who want to immigrate would have to wait a long time perhaps to get into Britain. People may also who have moved out of Britain for a particular reason may have relatives who live back in Britain so if they lose their job or reason why they moved to that other country in the first place might not exist anymore so they wish ...read more.

Conclusion

However in my opinion if all the other countries were how they should be people wouldn't need to immigrate and in most cases would be happy to stay in their own country because if poverty, religious persecution and political persecution didn't exist the world would be a different place how it should be and immigration policies wouldn't be as vital, people could be safe and happy in their own country. The world will never be like that however so the government has to pay thousands of pounds if not millions on immigration. That is why Britain has to open its doors to immigrants so instead of letting them suffer, Britain can allow them to have a better life however we can't protect everyone and thousands of migrants have to be turned away. The 'one in, one out' policy allows for that because it let's a few migrants in while takes into account the welfare of others already living in Britain because if too many immigrants were allowed in the country would get more into debt and eventually food sources would slowly run out which would end up in poor welfare for the immigrants and the people already living in Britain it would benefit no one. This policy allows immigrants gradually in to settle in Britain's society. This is why I feel this policy would be the best for the British government to choose. Sophie Pattinson 11T11 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The problem of illegal immigration in America.

    (Illegal Alien). Conservative lawmakers in Congress and state legislatures have announced initiatives to cancel automatic United States citizenship for children born here of illegal immigrant parents. (11.2 Million....'09). It is also a tendency for illegal immigrants to have children in USA so that they could get the US citizenship.

  2. Is immigration good or bad.

    comfortable life in Warsaw and it seems the dreams are a long way ahead of me," this emphasises further about the importants of preparation because she had to spend �2,000 on just moving to London and selecting a decent place to live.

  1. Multicultural Britain

    (See Appendix 1). Legal massacres of the Jews were organised by the government, these were known as pogroms. The worst of these took place at Kishinev in 1903 where over 500 people were injured, 49 were killed, 700 houses were destroyed leaving 2000 families homeless.

  2. In Britain, Immigration is the process of people living in other countries coming to ...

    Once inside the country, people with Visa's can find political embassies, though on English soil, the ground counts as foreign country. People from those countries can request to talk too ambassadors or appeal for help or protection, the <name of country> consulate takes care of the people living abroad in England.

  1. The Kurds make up about blank% of Turkeys population

    The PKK stopped almost all efforts and in 2000 the PKK officially announced the end of their struggle for independence through terrorism. (Harmon 109) In the last 4 years, amazing progress has been made for the Kurds in Turkey. The driving force behind the new civil rights is the European Union.

  2. The Mexican Economy

    The government stabilized the peso in with the aid of loans from the Treasury of the United States and the International Monetary Fund. In 1950, the problem of Mexican laborers who entered the United States to seek seasonal farm employment became a matter of grave concern to the two governments.

  1. The debate over immigration and French identity is one of the most controversial questions ...

    French workers believed that colonial subjects had come to France to take French jobs. The role played by colonial labourers as strikebreakers, in the great strikes of 1917 and 1918 reinforced their position as an economic threat. Competition wasn't only experienced in an economic, but als in a sexual way.

  2. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly na&amp;amp;iuml;ve.' Discuss.

    So Hall (1986:19) emphasize the necessity to analyze the institutional relationships in policy-making process which combine the components of the state and structure its relations. Recently, pluralism has developed into two new forms to response the above criticism. One is called reformed pluralism and the other one is neo-pluralism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work