• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is Richard Pipe's interpretation of the events of October 1917?

Extracts from this document...


What is Richard Pipe's interpretation of the events of October 1917? It is clearly obvious throughout the article 'Three whys of the Russian Revolution' by Richard Pipes that he believes that the events of October 1917 were a coup d'etate. He believes that it was an intellectual, rather then a class uprising, that that it was doomed to happen to Russia. A coup d'etate is when a small minority, which is usually the military, captures the government and the inhabitants of Russia do not actually know about it. A revolution is when it's a revolt from below, when there is a mass rising. He writes that 'Its alleged enemies, the Bolsheviks would seize power by occupying strategic points throughout the Capital city.' This is the first hint that it was a coup d'etate because if it was a popular uprising that would mean that it would be a massive amount of people protesting but it's not, it's only actually one group. ...read more.


This could prove that it was a coup because coups are revolts from above. This means that if it was a revolution it would be a revolt from below which it is not because there were no mass protests and also people wouldn't be able to gain control over the government as easily as this. After, the Military-Revolutionary Committee took over the capitals city's key installations. This leads the reader to believe that it was a coup because it was a small political group. The fact that the Russian people didn't really know what was actually going on further adds to this. Another example of this is the way the military headquarters were taken. The Bolshevik officers just walked in and replaced the officers that were there. This yet again strengthens the image that it was the Bolsheviks and not the entire Russian people that took over and caused a revolution. ...read more.


Or this could also indicate that maybe the Bolsheviks were trying to cover up what they were doing until they actually got complete control. It seemed that the government knew what was going on but none of the Russian people actually did. Pipes writes that 'it was widely believed that as soon as the Constituent Assembly had met, the Bolshevik government would gracefully yield power. And the new masters did nothing to dispel the mirage.' This leads the reader to believe that the government seemed to know what was going on, whereas, the Russian people had no clue what was actually taking place. This yet again strengthens the view in which Pipes is portraying. Which is, that it's a 'bloodless coup.' To conclude, all of these, plus several other points show that Richard Pipes believed that the October revolt in 1917 was a coup as he believes it was a revolt from above and the Bolsheviks has it all planned out from the beginning. Regan Kindrick KAG ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Was the Provisional Government doomed to failure?

    Had Kerensky been working for the good of the people, he would have been able to help the Provisional Government survive, especially as he as in constant contact with the Petrograd Soviet. However, it seemed he was too caught up in his own personal gain and this came across to

  2. It was the weakness of the provisional government that brought the October revolution about ...

    The first was the decision to release a large number of political prisoners and to invite Trotsky back from exile, with the view that this would calm those who rallied for free speech and political opinion. However, this (predictably) was not the case.

  1. Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks.

    I would argue, therefore, that the creation of a republic would significantly diminish the reinforcement of conservative values, ushering in important social change in its wake. Under the terms of the British Nationality Act of 1981, we Brits are deemed to be citizens.

  2. Why were there two Revolutions in Russia in 1917? Why did the Bolsheviks ...

    change certain aspects of the way in which the country was run. The Tsar soon realised that any form of change would be undermining his authority, so he dissolved the Duma in late August 1915, resulting in a huge loss of support from the elite.

  1. Explain why the Bolsheviks were successful in October 1917.

    This made the Provisional Government more unpopular because food, fuel and goods prices were still shooting up, and were becoming rationed in the cities due to short supply. This was because the men working in industry, farming, and factories were off working in the war, and also because the trains

  2. Timeline of Events Leading Up to the Russian Revolutions of 1917.

    * The current immense famine. * General difficulty with transportation. 1904 - The Japanese attack the Russians over the lush area of China known as Manchuria. The war is provoked by the Russian War Minister, Plehve. His plan was that the students and workers would desist protesting if they were provided with a situation in

  1. Explain why Lenin and the Bolsheviks replaced the Provisional Government as leaders of Russia ...

    The whole Dual Power system was obviously not going to work: in a way it was like the situation in Germany in 1919. The Kaiser had abdicated and a new government was set up - but it was a coalition government, and it took a long time for everyone to

  2. Russia, 1905 - 1917, The Causes of Revolutionary Change. Using your knowledge of the ...

    Instead they chose to increase the Russian war effort in June of 1917. This attack was known as the June Offensive, or sometimes the Galician Offensive. This was a very bad decision made by the leader of the Provisional Government, Alexander Kerensky.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work