• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is Richard Pipe's interpretation of the events of October 1917?

Extracts from this document...


What is Richard Pipe's interpretation of the events of October 1917? It is clearly obvious throughout the article 'Three whys of the Russian Revolution' by Richard Pipes that he believes that the events of October 1917 were a coup d'etate. He believes that it was an intellectual, rather then a class uprising, that that it was doomed to happen to Russia. A coup d'etate is when a small minority, which is usually the military, captures the government and the inhabitants of Russia do not actually know about it. A revolution is when it's a revolt from below, when there is a mass rising. He writes that 'Its alleged enemies, the Bolsheviks would seize power by occupying strategic points throughout the Capital city.' This is the first hint that it was a coup d'etate because if it was a popular uprising that would mean that it would be a massive amount of people protesting but it's not, it's only actually one group. ...read more.


This could prove that it was a coup because coups are revolts from above. This means that if it was a revolution it would be a revolt from below which it is not because there were no mass protests and also people wouldn't be able to gain control over the government as easily as this. After, the Military-Revolutionary Committee took over the capitals city's key installations. This leads the reader to believe that it was a coup because it was a small political group. The fact that the Russian people didn't really know what was actually going on further adds to this. Another example of this is the way the military headquarters were taken. The Bolshevik officers just walked in and replaced the officers that were there. This yet again strengthens the image that it was the Bolsheviks and not the entire Russian people that took over and caused a revolution. ...read more.


Or this could also indicate that maybe the Bolsheviks were trying to cover up what they were doing until they actually got complete control. It seemed that the government knew what was going on but none of the Russian people actually did. Pipes writes that 'it was widely believed that as soon as the Constituent Assembly had met, the Bolshevik government would gracefully yield power. And the new masters did nothing to dispel the mirage.' This leads the reader to believe that the government seemed to know what was going on, whereas, the Russian people had no clue what was actually taking place. This yet again strengthens the view in which Pipes is portraying. Which is, that it's a 'bloodless coup.' To conclude, all of these, plus several other points show that Richard Pipes believed that the October revolt in 1917 was a coup as he believes it was a revolt from above and the Bolsheviks has it all planned out from the beginning. Regan Kindrick KAG ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. It was the weakness of the provisional government that brought the October revolution about ...

    The situation rapidly worsened: "...robberies and housebreaking increased... week by week, food became scarcer...towards the end there was a week without bread at all." (John Reed, Ten Days that Shook the World). The Bolshevik party, with Lenin's pledge of "bread, peace and land" was one of the few realistic alternatives to the Provisional Government; the Bolsheviks took full advantage of the people's unrest and the Government's weaknesses.

  2. Explain why the Bolsheviks were successful in October 1917.

    Defeatist literature was distributed on a massive scale by radical socialists and Bolshevik agents and fraternization with the enemy hit the military ranks hard. Kerensky then visited the front and tried to rouse the soldiers to fight on, actually launching an offensive in July 1917.

  1. Democracy's Biggest Fan Speaks.

    Our "splendid" Royal Family is surrounded by expensive pomp that is entirely unnecessary and anachronistic. Moreover, I believe that such extravagant and ostentatious behaviour is inappropriate when so many in Britain have to tighten their belts to get by. I've no problem with being wealthy per se (especially if you've

  2. Timeline of Events Leading Up to the Russian Revolutions of 1917.

    Problems he inherits include: * General unrest within the multi-ethnic population. * An antiquated class system. * A badly led military in which the soldiers were actually referred to as dogs. * Much corruption within the government. * The current immense famine.

  1. Was the Provisional Government doomed to failure?

    a defensive war, seeking only to defend its own existing territory; or continue to fight alongside the Allies in the hope of winning more territory. The liberals were committed to continuing the war on the side of Britain and France, as they wanted Western help after the war for their fledgling economy, and wished to remain an important power internationally.

  2. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    In spite of an upsurge of leftist terror, radical leftist parties participated in the election and, together with the nonparty left, gained a plurality of seats, followed by a loose coalition of Kadets and of Poles and other nationalities in the political center.

  1. Explain why Lenin and the Bolsheviks replaced the Provisional Government as leaders of Russia ...

    They wanted to make sure that the Government would be fair and that the working class people of Petrogard would get the most out of the government. There was one catch; the provisional government could not make a decision without the soviet having agreed to it.

  2. Why were there two Revolutions in Russia in 1917? Why did the Bolsheviks ...

    Countless numbers of people no longer trusted their current, rulers, they blamed the Tsar because they thought he was the Tsarina's influence, however, today we all know that it was that of Rasputin, through greed and desire of power. Because of this Alexandra chose to live outside the city, away from publicity and out of sight of the public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work