What is Richard Pipe's interpretation of the events of October 1917?

Authors Avatar

Regan Kindrick                                                                                                KAG

What is Richard Pipe’s interpretation of the events of October 1917?

It is clearly obvious throughout the article ‘Three whys of the Russian Revolution’ by Richard Pipes that he believes that the events of October 1917 were a coup d’etate. He believes that it was an intellectual, rather then a class uprising, that that it was doomed to happen to Russia. A coup d’etate is when a small minority, which is usually the military, captures the government and the inhabitants of Russia do not actually know about it. A revolution is when it’s a revolt from below, when there is a mass rising.

   He writes that ‘Its alleged enemies, the Bolsheviks would seize power by occupying strategic points throughout the Capital city.’ This is the first hint that it was a coup d’etate because if it was a popular uprising that would mean that it would be a massive amount of people protesting but it’s not, it’s only actually one group.

Join now!

   Furthermore, he writes about the Bolsheviks in a cruel way. This gives the reader a stronger opinion that he felt it was a coup. He talks about how the Bolsheviks were against the Provisional Government and how they had been planning it for a long time and were just waiting for the right time to actually do their coup. This shows that they were actually against the government and wanted a change.

  In addition, they agreed to a Menshevik motion, which helped them to further their coup. The soviets “Military-Revolutionary Committee” was there to protect Petrograd and from ...

This is a preview of the whole essay