• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What options do the Government have in their attempts to reform the House of Lords?

Extracts from this document...


08/05/07 Tim Gloster What options do the Government have in their attempts to reform the House of Lords? The government have seven options to choose from when they decide on how the House of Lords should be filled up, and by whom. The first option is to have a fully appointed house, this however is seen as undemocratic and having little advance on the current house. This option does have its positive side as it could include independents, experts, like doctors, lawyers, and academics etc. who all have experience and knowledge in their own particular field and it represents all sections of society. If this were the option chosen a committee would need to be set up to decides who is appointed, this would have to be non-partisan and independent of the government, a royal institute for example. ...read more.


The third option is an 80% appointed, 20% elected House of Lords. This was the proposed option in the government's white paper. Its advantages are that it mixes established figures with a democratic voice. However it is very confusing and elected members may struggle for power and attention over the majority of the appointed peers. Nevertheless this option does not seem likely as it has been abandoned by the government. The fourth option is to have an 80% elected, 20% appointed House. This option is backed by reformers as a compromise and most of the Conservative Party. Its advantages are that it allows effective elections but retains a handful of appointed experts. On the other hand this is a compromised option and is little advance on a fully elected house. ...read more.


It is backed by many MP's who want reform but fear an aggressive fully elected house, as mentioned in the second option. The chances of this option being implemented are excellent, it is seen as a good compromise and the government would accept it. The sixth option is a 50% appointed, 50% elected House. This option, even though it lacks strong support, is quite likely as all sides could settle for this. Its advantages are that it offers even numbers and neatness therefore making it easier to understand and bringing a balance of legitimacy and expertise. However this could lead to deadlock and the ultimate compromise. There is an eighth option but it is extremely unlikely. And that is to completely abolish the House of Lords. But this will probably never happen as it would give the Commons too much power and would not be very popular, even though some MP's are calling for it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    Besides, it also recommended that there need not to alter the judicial function or the membership of the Law Lords and the House of Lords would continue to be the highest court of appeal in England and Wales. The report recommended that there be greater use of pre-legislative scrutiny Bills and would remove the power to defeat secondary legislation.

  2. Electoral Reform

    the country as the coalition formed from a PR system is volatile. Those in favour of PR would argue that PR would remove 'safe' seats with their characteristic of low-turnout. If each vote counts, people would feel more inclined to involve themselves in elections.

  1. The need for reform

    The Government would have to do something to ensure basic health levels among the population. Popular socialism The Labour Party had just been established and it was winning public support for its campaigns for social welfare policies, such as old age pensions and unemployment benefits.

  2. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    However, Labour cannot hide or deny that they will personally benefit from the removal of the hereditary peers. These peers are mostly conservative and have and will continue to pose a threat as they tend to resist the labour government and some of their proposed legislation.

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    Britain was crippled by strikes and governments were weak. When the Conservatives came to power in 1979 they argued that democracy was 'overloaded' with expectations government could not fulfil and on the verge of collapse. The Conservatives therefore came to power in 1979 with clear values and priorities but they had no 'blueprint' for reform and the reforms which

  2. A House Divided.

    This led to a more evenly balanced sex ratio. Life expectancy was also about 10-20 years greater than men and women born in Chesapeake society. The Northern colonies possessed strength and stability because they were banded together by a common sense of purpose. In most cases, such as in Massachusetts Bay, this common sense of purpose was God.

  1. What are the arguments for and against electing all the members of the second ...

    The majority of hereditary peers are widely believed to be of Conservative loyalty politically due to the previous supremacy of the party in British history resulting in such ideals being shared by the people in power in the past when assigning peers.

  2. Discuss The Various Roles of an MP in the House of Commons.

    The outcome of standing committees is usually predictable. The standing committee lack information due to lack of evidence and information sources passed from outside and individual bodies. The Standing committee could be reformed in many ways; there could be a fixed timetable where the guillotine cannot be applied.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work