• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What options do the Government have in their attempts to reform the House of Lords?

Extracts from this document...


08/05/07 Tim Gloster What options do the Government have in their attempts to reform the House of Lords? The government have seven options to choose from when they decide on how the House of Lords should be filled up, and by whom. The first option is to have a fully appointed house, this however is seen as undemocratic and having little advance on the current house. This option does have its positive side as it could include independents, experts, like doctors, lawyers, and academics etc. who all have experience and knowledge in their own particular field and it represents all sections of society. If this were the option chosen a committee would need to be set up to decides who is appointed, this would have to be non-partisan and independent of the government, a royal institute for example. ...read more.


The third option is an 80% appointed, 20% elected House of Lords. This was the proposed option in the government's white paper. Its advantages are that it mixes established figures with a democratic voice. However it is very confusing and elected members may struggle for power and attention over the majority of the appointed peers. Nevertheless this option does not seem likely as it has been abandoned by the government. The fourth option is to have an 80% elected, 20% appointed House. This option is backed by reformers as a compromise and most of the Conservative Party. Its advantages are that it allows effective elections but retains a handful of appointed experts. On the other hand this is a compromised option and is little advance on a fully elected house. ...read more.


It is backed by many MP's who want reform but fear an aggressive fully elected house, as mentioned in the second option. The chances of this option being implemented are excellent, it is seen as a good compromise and the government would accept it. The sixth option is a 50% appointed, 50% elected House. This option, even though it lacks strong support, is quite likely as all sides could settle for this. Its advantages are that it offers even numbers and neatness therefore making it easier to understand and bringing a balance of legitimacy and expertise. However this could lead to deadlock and the ultimate compromise. There is an eighth option but it is extremely unlikely. And that is to completely abolish the House of Lords. But this will probably never happen as it would give the Commons too much power and would not be very popular, even though some MP's are calling for it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    Deputy Director Chris Lawrence-Pietroni of Charter88 said the legislation works ineffectively in making the House of Lords; this would lack the democratic legitimacy and public confidence to do its job of scrutinising legislation and holding the accountable of government. It is submitted that, although the number of appointed member is increasing but it remains the problem of representative.

  2. Electoral Reform

    the country as the coalition formed from a PR system is volatile. Those in favour of PR would argue that PR would remove 'safe' seats with their characteristic of low-turnout. If each vote counts, people would feel more inclined to involve themselves in elections.

  1. The need for reform

    One in three potential recruits was refused on medical grounds. This led to questions being asked about the physical condition of the working class male. Would he be able to perform the tasks expected of him in the workplace and on the battlefield?

  2. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    Ashbee and N. Ashford, 1999). Law lords in the UK sit in the house of Lords and deliberate over potential law can be asked for their advice, the same people are then expected to implement the same law into British society, these members are also, stereotypically, white middle / upper

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    costs, waste and efficiency because funding comes from what is commonly perceived to be a bottom-less public purse. Public spending under the post-war consensus was constantly rising and had to be paid for in high taxes which reduced individual incentives to work.

  2. A House Divided.

    This led to a more evenly balanced sex ratio. Life expectancy was also about 10-20 years greater than men and women born in Chesapeake society. The Northern colonies possessed strength and stability because they were banded together by a common sense of purpose. In most cases, such as in Massachusetts Bay, this common sense of purpose was God.

  1. What are the arguments for and against electing all the members of the second ...

    The majority of hereditary peers are widely believed to be of Conservative loyalty politically due to the previous supremacy of the party in British history resulting in such ideals being shared by the people in power in the past when assigning peers.

  2. Discuss The Various Roles of an MP in the House of Commons.

    However there are problems with the standing committee because they have no specialist knowledge or expertise, so it is pointless for certain MPs to be in there. MPs have so many bills to look at that they do not do the job effectively.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work