• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was Chartism and why did it fail

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kennington Common 1848 Illustrated London News What was Chartism and why did it fail? By Linsey Misik Chartism: 'The principles and practices of a party of political reformers, chiefly workingmen, active in England from 1838 to 1848'. This was working class vocalizing their grievances of poor pay and working conditions with the purpose of achieving representation in the government. Relatively easy to sum up in a sentence but does not encompass the true Chartist. It can be difficult to understand the plight of others and as all historians know, hard to give an un-biased view on a specific time in history. The initial historians such as Mark Hovell, saw Chartism as an attempt to shake the equilibrium of the establishment by the uncivilized working class or a 'howl for hunger'. Other historians viewed the movement as a revolutionary change to create a democratic society where 'the people are the source of all power'. In which format you choose to translate Chartism it does define how we look at its failures. At the end of ten years the movement achieved none of its initial demands and therefore could be deemed a failure but is it a fair estimation of the movement as a whole. The members organised meetings and published newspapers which exposed their plight to the nation and united the working-class people. If the movement was digested by the ruling class and it halted their idea of complacency then the Chartist movement equates to some success in planting seed in the government minds. ...read more.

Middle

The first backed with 1.28 million signatures, the second with 3.3 million signatures, the third with over 6 million signatures (although there seemed to have several fraudulent signatures making it around 2 million real signatures). The petitions were rejected every time and there ensued outbreaks of violence which the government took swift and extreme steps to restore order. The initial phase of Chartism was quickly thwarted by the utilised ever-increasing army by sending the main leaders to gaol notably John Frost who organised the Newport Rising when over 5000 miners attacked the town and consequently twenty were killed by troops sent by the authorities and Frost sentenced to death (but was transported). Around 1842 the main leaders emerged from gaol and reconvened asking members to pay a penny a month. In the final phase (1847-8) whilst there were revolutions on the continent the flamboyant O 'Connor alongside his fellow Chartist were delivering their final petition en mass. The large body of petitioners were met by police and then told by O 'Connor to disperse. They were delivered in three cabs but met with ridicule when it was realised it contained bogus signatures. This was the end for Chartism and it was written off by most as an unsuccessful attempt at hearing their voices in government. The humorous cartoon below by John Leech published in Punch magazine displays his interpretation of the rise and fall of Chartism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Anti corn league also had the support of the middle classes, along with their money. The violence of the Chartists and a reluctant O Connor for to accept the middle classes would be to 'domesticate the charter' could also be attributed to their downfall. The three petitions were handed to the government in time of economic hardship and as the chartist folded Britain was moving into a time of prosperity this cut the price of bread from 11.5p in 1847 to 7p in 1850. This improved the quality of life and led more employees to the trade unions or cooperatives and left Chartism abandoned. This is difficult to back up this evidence as the severe depressions of 1839 and 1842 did were eradicated it is difficult to prove that the living conditions were in fact improved. D Thompson noted that 'As far as achievement of the six points went, the Chartists failed completely.' So was Chartism itself a failure? In the industrial towns of Lancashire and Yorkshire the movement was to create a distinctive culture among the working classes. It gave an understanding of the need to unite for the cause to provide essential focus. It gave a blueprint into how to formulate a protest and to vocalise and circulate nationally the needs of the cause. The indent that the chartists left imprinted on the mind of many ordinary working class families was summed up by Edward Royle 'the greatest achievement of was Chartism, a movement shot through not with despair but with hope. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    These short-term measures employed by the government helped to appease many people, forcing back progress made by the Chartists. This effect can be linked with a weakness of leadership, as it was perhaps an indication that Chartist demands were 'ahead of their time'.

  2. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Peel would have been sceptical of this because he wanted to preserve the settled institutions, and by extending the suffrage to everyone, he would be putting them at risk. This was because some of the working class would favour the disestablishment of the Church of England, and a redistribution of the land.

  1. Why was Chartism a failure?

    The majority of the middle classes refused to support Chartism. This was due to the fact that they had their own organisation, the Anti-Corn Law league, which campaigned an issue far closer to their hearts than anything Chartism could promote.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    The president of the Council was the Governor himself, and the fact that the decisions in the council were taken by the majority of the vote, the Governor's vote was crucial in many decisions that indirectly or directly were anti pro-English.

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    Parliament's next idea was to force the English landowners in Ireland to bear the cost of the famine; according to the Poor Laws, landlords were bound to support their "peasants" who were sent to the workhouse, which cost �12. As a result landlords in Ireland now tried to evict all

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    national heritage with scientific methods...to recreate civilisation".8 Although conservatives strongly opposed such a measure, the social atmosphere encouraged change, with the government eventually allowing Hu's new style of writing to be adopted in schools in 1920. University students, with a wider understanding of western social philosophy than the older conservatives,

  1. The failure of Chartism was due to improved economical conditions rather than the movement's ...

    which now looking back was a crucial factor in the failure. Evidence of government repression here is the example of the Newport Rising in 1839.

  2. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    As capitalist economies sputtered with the oil crisis of 1973, Black trade unions revived. A wave of strikes reflected a new militancy that involved better organisation and was drawing new sectors, in particular intellectuals and the student movement, into mass struggle and debate over the principles informing it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work