• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which major domestic and international factors made German unification possible?

Extracts from this document...


Which major domestic and international factors made German unification possible? The process that occurred to unify both East and West Germany was one, which had taken many years to occur, and, when it finally did in 1989 it was somewhat of a relief to both Germany and the rest of Europe itself. There are many factors both domestically and internationally, which played important parts in helping Germany to become a unified state once again, from the collapse of the SED to the major role, which President Gorbachev of the USSR had to play. These are just two of the numerous reasons for the eventual unification and more will be explained throughout. Unification for Germany was always going to be difficult due to numerous obstacles occurring in its pathway. On the international front the fact that the Western States were against the idea of unification occurring between the East and West Germany was always going to hinder the process. The reason for this being that the two German states formed the frontline between NATO and the Warsaw pact, and from this the West were not prepared at all to contemplate the formation of a Germany which was not actively involved in NATO. The United States of America were all for the unification process however like Great Britain and France, they wanted Germany to remain a full member of NATO, and unification may have jeopardised that which may have caused many problems, mostly to do with security. The Federal Republic also echoed the refusal for unification as "NATO membership not only brought the Federal Republic the termination of occupation rights but also guaranteed it a voice in the Western system". ...read more.


This is evident with the problems, which were occurring with the Chinese and SED party coalition in which many people took to the streets to voice their opinion. The SED did not use force to quell the unhappiness of the people, thus meaning that the people were starting to have more of an influence on current situations hence undermining the authorities, which were in place at the time. Another problem, which was evident within the SED, was the enormous pressure it was under to reform. "Encouraged by examples set in Hungary, Poland and even the Soviet Union, alternatives to the Stalinist central control were being articulated in the GDR"6, however the fact of the matter is that the SED government was aging and utterly incapable of dealing with the demands of reform and even when it tried to reform certain issues domestically, such as the areas of travel and political pluralism, it only seemed to accelerate its demise. Furthermore the limited reforms the SED had made along with the speeches made from Gorbachev, encouraged the reform movement in Easter Germany, and led to the formation of numerous opposition groups, which eventually led to the end of the GDR. The internal collapse of the GDR was a vastly important factor in the unification of Germany. The GDR had been affected by so many different problems. The fact that the Eastern countries like Hungary had relaxed their borders meaning that Germans were able to move through Eastern Europe and into the FRG caused the GDR to become a weakened party. This was due to the fact that the people who moved into the FRG realised how badly the state was being run inside the GDR and hence turned against it. ...read more.


Fortunately for Germany, a third alternative was offered in the face of the CDU. The old leadership had been destroyed and the eastern and western CDU parties united. Helmut Kohl organised the alliance of democratic parties, including the CDU and the free democrats, to stand in the eastern elections, and in the end this alliance won enough votes to be able to form the first democratically elected government of the GDR. In this it was the unification issue which was most important and a main reason for why the CDU won this election was due to the fact that the voters knew that Kohl stood for rapid unification under a capitalist economic system, and this was the way people wanted to go. In Conclusion, there are many things, which were needed in order to make unification a possibility. Firstly the relaxation of the Soviet control, which was granted by Gorbachev, perhaps by accident with this programmes of perestroika and glasnost were extremely important because once the USSR were moving away from communist elements, it made things a lot harder for the GDR. Secondly, the overthrow of the SED in East Germany, which was achieved by a combination of the party leaderships own ineptitude and the demonstrations of the people of the GDR. Thirdly it was essential that there be a pro-unification government and chancellor in Bonn, with the vision to undertake the unification process. Such a man was provided in the form of Helmut Kohl as he took the risk of allowing economic union to precede political union. Kohl recognised that economic union was needed immediately to attempt to turn around the economic crisis that was occurring in the GDR. Therefore the vision and courage of Kohl were essential to the unification process. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Pluralism in domestic politics

    This brings us to the question of moral and the role of the state in mediating the competing interests. Carr says that "The state is the repository of political power and there is no authority above the state capable of imposing moral behavior on it" (Carr 2001:146).

  2. How and why did Federation occur?

    Australians voted against this but it was a bitter referendum and people were still very frightened about Communism. * Australians fought in Vietnam between 1962 and 1972. $7,000 Australians were sent to Vietnam and 501 were killed. Many of these young men were conscripts and only 18 (Australians had to 21 to vote in an election at this time).

  1. When disputing over international borders of relations it is very common for history to ...

    The Chinese delegate would only initial the agreement and therefore failed to put a full signature because he was under pressure from Beijing. As a result, Britain and Tibet agreed that they would follow the provisions of the agreement but that China would not get any of the privileges mentioned.

  2. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    gained enough support and popularity which resulted in him being elected and consequently being able to govern Turkey. It was then in which he was given the opportunity to lead Turkey in the direction that he imagined. It was held that Ataturk's principle goals were to "...secure the independence, peace

  1. Britain was humiliated by international opinion and made to look foolish after the Suez ...

    Similarly, other formerly receptive countries helped to humiliate and isolate Britain from the global community. The supposed pro British government in India condemned military action, Premier Nehru described the invasion as "adverse" and "unconstructive".

  2. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    as by the 'civilian wing' of the struggle the "Proshit" Group criticized the accord, albeit for different reasons. The BNP thought it was a sell out on the part of the Government to the rebels. The Proshit Group thought it was a sell out on the part of the Shantibahini (as their armed wing was popularly called).


    In terms of types of 'polity' this is a mixture of oligarchy and democracy. Aristotle believes that the best possible state, one in which virtue is best able to prevail is one in which some political functions are assigned to the many poor and lower classes, and other functions to the few rich and well born.

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    cannot be carried on the backs of a few dignitaries and influential elders. A constitutional republic which does not [allow] action of the majority of the people is a bogus republic and bogus constitutionalism...because there has been no change in the thought or the character of the majority of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work