• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who Holds Power in the United Kingdom Today?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who Holds Power in the United Kingdom Today? To approach this question it is essential to consider both the definitions of power and the various different domains within which they work. As power is central to the understanding of politics, it evokes fierce controversy over its meaning. Academics have argued that politics strives to resolve conflict by producing consensus over the issues in question. In contrast, the practice of politics may also be seen solely as a means of execising power, be it through particular coercive forces or a legitimate authoratitive body. Political activity is omnipresent, existing on both micro level (as seen in the relationship between teacher and student) and on a macro level, meaning the state. Consequently, this brings us to make a necessary distinction between 'power' and 'influence'. The former can be seen as an ability to make significant political decisions which facilitates the control over others. e.g.the power of government over society. In contrast, the latter implies the potential to transform any component part of these decisions via some form of external pressure. For instance, this may include anything from rational debating within Parliament, to open intimidation such as armed police forces. Liberal democratic politics dictate the political agenda of the British political system. The 'liberal' element advocates the support for a multitude of different networks within the state as well as a number of different groups working seprate from the state. For example, N.G.Os, a Bill of Rights, an autonomous judiciary and finally, a complex system of 'checks and balances' within the institutions of government. ...read more.

Middle

This is because the state is the result of the class system and its main concern is to conserve and defend both class domination and exploitation. Lenin makes reference to the state by claiming that it is 'an instrument for the oppression of the exploitated class'. Of course, it is certainly recognisable that both elitists and Marxists alike share some similarities. This is illustrated in the view that cohesive political elites are predominant in the U.K, and that democratic institutions are artificial. However, although we must realise that both Marxists and Elitists have indeed reached the same conclusions, it is vital that we also realise that they fervently differ on the means in which they reach such conclusions. Marxism proposes the notion that the root of the problem lies in the economic structure of society, suggesting that the elite (or the 'ruling class') only holds power because it controls and owns capital. Of course, the Elitists argue against this by insisting that hierarchy is a natural process and will always inevitably emerge from any given situation and thus the domination of elites is psychological, not artificial. In short, Marxists believe that capitalism exists only to serve the interest of the bourgeoisie, the ruling class, and as a result the proletariat will be inextricably oppressed. A striking example of the Marxist theory put into practice would be that of the tobacco industry, where multi-international financial transactions are taking place amongst an elite few (which are, in turn accumulating great wealth) ...read more.

Conclusion

We like to deceive ourselves that we live in a 'democracy' but because of our archaic voting system of 'first-past-the-post', the government cannot represent views of the majority. Also, in a true democracy the War in Iraq would not have happened, considering the huge number of people that turned up to protest against it. Unfortunately, even under the Secret Ballot Act of 1872 whereby we are suposed to have the right to vote annonymously, we are not even entitled to that freedom because the ballot papers are either numbered or colour coded allowing scope for whoever is in power to check how you voted. Consequently, if our representative form of democracy is not democratic, by implication we must live under the rule of a state elite. And if it is the case that such an elite must strive in every way possible to promote big business in order to uphold social cohesion, then surely it is impossible to deny that capitalist interests are the basis of all governmental decisions. It would only be logical to conclude that the concept of who holds power in the U.K today is merely a guise with government being a necessary shadow passed over society by the interests of big business. The reason this stlye of government has endured for so long is perhaps mans neccessity to believe that he has some control over his own destiny or as Thomas Paine so eloquently put it in the "Rights of Man" (1789), "Society is in every state a blessing, but, government in its best state is but a necessary evil". Mikaela Lee-Willson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the United Kingdom Parliament is sovereign. Consider both legal ...

    In 1925 the Housing Act had slightly different terms, and it was argued that in fact this later Act could be ineffective because it also applied to subsequent acts. This was struck down by the courts, who argued that the legislature cannot bind subsequent Parliaments.

  2. Arguments for and Against the use of Referendums in the UK

    They promised referendums on reform, devolution and the Euro, and since the Conservative Party were opposed to change involving these issues, a percentage of the electorate may have voted according to these policies. Referendums can be used to break deadlocks between the Houses of Lords and Commons.

  1. How Is Power Distributed In The United Kingdom?

    The Judiciary is the court system within the UK. Juries within courts are made up of Citizens picked at random. Whereas Judges are usually highly educated officials who are paid a salary as it is their job.

  2. How much power and influence does the civil service have?

    In the case of policy errors or mistakes in implementation it is the minister who has to resign, not the Civil Servant - the Civil Servant should not be held responsible because they have no role in decision making. Despite this view that Civil Servants should not hold political power they have come under criticism.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    a decisive 53.8 percent for Yeltsin against 40.3 percent for Zyuganov (White, Rose and McAllister 1996). A majority-runoff is also used in legislative elections in Mali and the Ukraine, and a plurality-runoff is used for the French National Assembly. The aim of runoff elections is to consolidate support behind the

  2. Nationalism as applied to business

    The term neoliberalism is not the only one for this movement, its supporters argue that it is simply "liberalism," while critics (along with some supporters) often label it Thatcherism (United Kingdom), Reaganomics (United States of America), Economic Rationalism (Australia), Rogernomics (New Zealand)

  1. Citizenship - participating in society

    The Videos that we used were from the NHS and Frank. The videos main purpose was that young children did not smoke. It showed all the affects and a real life scenario was shown so the pupils were all aware of what smoking can do to you.

  2. The Legislative acts as a check on the Executive - To what extent is ...

    The executive (Lord Chancellor) sits as a legislator. The executive (through the whip system) controls the legislature, the legislature grants the executive legislative powers by delegated legislation and finally the executive appoint bishops, who have legislative powers. All this means is that because the three powers are not clearly cut, they may influence each other, especially the executive and the legislative in favour of what they believe in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work