• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who Holds Power in the United Kingdom Today?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who Holds Power in the United Kingdom Today? To approach this question it is essential to consider both the definitions of power and the various different domains within which they work. As power is central to the understanding of politics, it evokes fierce controversy over its meaning. Academics have argued that politics strives to resolve conflict by producing consensus over the issues in question. In contrast, the practice of politics may also be seen solely as a means of execising power, be it through particular coercive forces or a legitimate authoratitive body. Political activity is omnipresent, existing on both micro level (as seen in the relationship between teacher and student) and on a macro level, meaning the state. Consequently, this brings us to make a necessary distinction between 'power' and 'influence'. The former can be seen as an ability to make significant political decisions which facilitates the control over others. e.g.the power of government over society. In contrast, the latter implies the potential to transform any component part of these decisions via some form of external pressure. For instance, this may include anything from rational debating within Parliament, to open intimidation such as armed police forces. Liberal democratic politics dictate the political agenda of the British political system. The 'liberal' element advocates the support for a multitude of different networks within the state as well as a number of different groups working seprate from the state. For example, N.G.Os, a Bill of Rights, an autonomous judiciary and finally, a complex system of 'checks and balances' within the institutions of government. ...read more.

Middle

This is because the state is the result of the class system and its main concern is to conserve and defend both class domination and exploitation. Lenin makes reference to the state by claiming that it is 'an instrument for the oppression of the exploitated class'. Of course, it is certainly recognisable that both elitists and Marxists alike share some similarities. This is illustrated in the view that cohesive political elites are predominant in the U.K, and that democratic institutions are artificial. However, although we must realise that both Marxists and Elitists have indeed reached the same conclusions, it is vital that we also realise that they fervently differ on the means in which they reach such conclusions. Marxism proposes the notion that the root of the problem lies in the economic structure of society, suggesting that the elite (or the 'ruling class') only holds power because it controls and owns capital. Of course, the Elitists argue against this by insisting that hierarchy is a natural process and will always inevitably emerge from any given situation and thus the domination of elites is psychological, not artificial. In short, Marxists believe that capitalism exists only to serve the interest of the bourgeoisie, the ruling class, and as a result the proletariat will be inextricably oppressed. A striking example of the Marxist theory put into practice would be that of the tobacco industry, where multi-international financial transactions are taking place amongst an elite few (which are, in turn accumulating great wealth) ...read more.

Conclusion

We like to deceive ourselves that we live in a 'democracy' but because of our archaic voting system of 'first-past-the-post', the government cannot represent views of the majority. Also, in a true democracy the War in Iraq would not have happened, considering the huge number of people that turned up to protest against it. Unfortunately, even under the Secret Ballot Act of 1872 whereby we are suposed to have the right to vote annonymously, we are not even entitled to that freedom because the ballot papers are either numbered or colour coded allowing scope for whoever is in power to check how you voted. Consequently, if our representative form of democracy is not democratic, by implication we must live under the rule of a state elite. And if it is the case that such an elite must strive in every way possible to promote big business in order to uphold social cohesion, then surely it is impossible to deny that capitalist interests are the basis of all governmental decisions. It would only be logical to conclude that the concept of who holds power in the U.K today is merely a guise with government being a necessary shadow passed over society by the interests of big business. The reason this stlye of government has endured for so long is perhaps mans neccessity to believe that he has some control over his own destiny or as Thomas Paine so eloquently put it in the "Rights of Man" (1789), "Society is in every state a blessing, but, government in its best state is but a necessary evil". Mikaela Lee-Willson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the United Kingdom Parliament is sovereign. Consider both legal ...

    In 1925 the Housing Act had slightly different terms, and it was argued that in fact this later Act could be ineffective because it also applied to subsequent acts. This was struck down by the courts, who argued that the legislature cannot bind subsequent Parliaments.

  2. How Is Power Distributed In The United Kingdom?

    The Judiciary is the court system within the UK. Juries within courts are made up of Citizens picked at random. Whereas Judges are usually highly educated officials who are paid a salary as it is their job.

  1. Arguments for and Against the use of Referendums in the UK

    that fourteen years of national argument are over', emphasising the ability to make a final decision on various issues. Using the promise of referendums have proved to play a part in attracting support for political parties in general elections. A possible example could have been the Labour Party before the 1997 election.

  2. How much power and influence does the civil service have?

    In the case of policy errors or mistakes in implementation it is the minister who has to resign, not the Civil Servant - the Civil Servant should not be held responsible because they have no role in decision making. Despite this view that Civil Servants should not hold political power they have come under criticism.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    In the final preferences however the ALP won 46.4 percent compared with 53.6 percent for non-ALP candidates. Again this process translates a close lead into a more decisive majority of seats for the leading party. This systematically discriminates against those at the bottom of the poll in order to promote effective government for the winner.

  2. Niccolo Machiavelli. His views revolved around the ideas that one must do anything ...

    One of the most important concepts created in politics by Machiavelli is that of image. The appearance of a prince should be virtuous and good, but he must not necessarily be that way. Propaganda carried out by the ruler's people should exult and glorify him, taking away the people's attention from his real actions.

  1. Citizenship - participating in society

    of text which would be boring and it would get confusing to read. The PowerPoint presentation which I created was a good job as it had lots of key facts as well as pictures that were animated and the pupils in year 7 found it interesting ad they looked at

  2. Nationalism as applied to business

    Such is the jungle of ... economic life. A jungle of savage beasts, where the one who can kill the one next to him, kills him Underlying this is a more general neoliberal vision that every human being is an entrepreneur managing their own life, and should act as such.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work