• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Balfour resign in 1905?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Balfour resign in 1905? By 1905 Arthur Balfour and his government were in trouble. Whilst still maintaining a majority in the House of Commons and a strong power in the House of Lords, the popularity of the government was beginning to fall. With the loss of recent by-elections Balfour decided that resigning might be the wisest choice of action. There are two main possibilities as to why Balfour chose this drastic choice of action: the first is that he had grown tired of parliament and with falling public popularity and party confidence he decided that he would retire. The second reason is that Balfour saw divisions in the opposition headed by Campbell-Bannerman, and decided to exploit it by forcing the Liberals into taking office with very little chance of forming a cabinet. ...read more.


There was also the fact that there had been no general election, bar the Khaki election of 1900, for 10 years. Another cause of unpopularity was the rising level of unemployment since 1904 and the increasing anger of the general dismissal of the Irish Home Rule problem. One of the key features of the Unionist party was that it was its nature averse to change and that was exactly what the people wanted (particularly the ideas associated with the welfare state), and Balfour was unable to provide it. In essence this reason for Balfour's resignation is summed up by the following quotation from Grey's thoughts "...it was more than 2 years since the Free Trade members of the government had resigned; the shock of that had not broken up the government then and could not be the reason for its resignation now. ...read more.


Balfour thought that if Bannerman was forced to take office then he would be unable to form an effective government and that the liberals would be forced to form an unpopular and weak government. Asquith says that he had seen this written elsewhere and believed it to be true "Mr. Balfour was reputed at that time to be a past-master of political tactics." If a liberal believed that Balfour was a tactical genius then it is most likely that the resignation was a tactical move. In conclusion, I believe that Balfour's resignation in 1905 was a tactical move, as he had no strong reason to resign due to his majority in the House of Commons. He gambled on the supposed weaknesses of the Liberal party. That move failed, as the liberals were able to create a strong and able government. Balfour lost the general election and his seat at Manchester. Paul Wimpenny 12KJP ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Summary of the Causes of the 1905 Revolution.

    - The assassination of Alexander II had a great impact on Tsar Alexander III, who continued to rule Russia in the style of his father, a government characterized by bureaucratic paternalism and a strenuous upholding of the principles of Russian autocracy - Censorship of the Orthodox religion, Russification, pogroms against

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    1994 were allegedly asked to research speeches of ex-ministers then at odds with John Major and to research ministers party conference speeches. The clearest evidence of the dilemmas faced by civil servants was revealed by the Scott Inquiry into the arms sales to Iraq, when several ministers were publicly re-stating

  1. The Revolution of 1905 in Russia

    So the Mensheviks convened in Vienna under Trotsky's leadership. The Bolsheviks and Mensheviks disagreed on two main points: 1. the philosophy of history which involved the attitude toward bourgeois liberalism; 2. the nature of party organization. The Mensheviks believe there must be bourgeois democratic republic as a necessary first stage toward revolution.

  2. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    In spite of an upsurge of leftist terror, radical leftist parties participated in the election and, together with the nonparty left, gained a plurality of seats, followed by a loose coalition of Kadets and of Poles and other nationalities in the political center.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work