• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced that he supported a repeal of the Corn Laws that protected the landed classes it

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced that he supported a repeal of the Corn Laws that protected the landed classes it resulted in his resignation and the split of the Conservative Party and arguably therefore Peel was the 'founder of modern Conservatism' (Gash). However although the issue of repeal was the main issue that delivered the final blow to the party, as R Stewart states 'the rot had set in some years before.' The Great Reform Act had created within the Conservatives a party of movement and a party of resistance. One was a more liberal type of conservatism, which aimed to appease to prevent the spread of democracy; the other was anti catholic and protectionist, the old conservatism. It was the clash of these two groupings that led to the eventual split in the party. The split although having many causes had its roots in reform but was pushed up into the sunlight by the arrogant actions of Peel. The repeal of the corn laws, if not the major cause, was most definitely the last straw that finally split the two sides of the party; as R. Stewart describes it "for the Conservative party, repeal was a watershed." To understand the way in which the suggestion of repeal of the corn laws by Peel led to the split in the party we must first look to the causes of the split in opinion between the those in favour of reform and the protectionists. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore the extent of Peel's 'betrayal' and the extent to which he is to blame may be bought into question, although the fact remains that Peel had publicly announced his support of the Corn Laws. As for the argument that Peel ignored his backbenchers thus causing substantial tension and eventual split; Stewart argues that since the days of Pitt there had been strain within the party between the business men of the cabinet and the squires of the backbenches. Perhaps then Peels arrogance towards the backbenchers was nothing out of the ordinary and we should be careful about how much blame we place on Peel. However Gash makes the important point that in the days of Pitt he could afford major defeats as he had the crown to fall back upon, but by the time of Peel parliament had far more authority in making the controversial administrative decisions and therefore Peel needed the support of his party. Perhaps if Peel's actions and attitude towards the repeal of Corn Laws had been the only way in which he acted slightly tyrannically, as some of protectionists described his actions, then the party may not have become so unstable; however it was not. The other major issue in which Peel's decisions contributed significantly to the split in the Tory party was the way in which he handled the situation of Catholicism and Ireland; Once again the backbenchers were left unconsulted and their opinions ignored. There was a certain tradition within the Conservative party of anti-Catholicism and attacks on the Irish, Catholicism was seen by the ...read more.

Conclusion

split in the conservative party or was it in fact a well thought out adaptation to the constitution to prevent revolution and protect the landed classes? Peel was an opportunist, a number of historians agree with this view such as Anna Ramsay, however Peel's great weakness was his arrogance and failure to see future consequences of his actions made him the solely most important factor in the split of the Conservative party. The way In which he acted was at times despotic even tyrannical, not only on the issues of corn and Ireland but on numerous other occasions such as the attempt by parliament to reduce the working hours in factories, the act was passed but Peel threatened to resign and thus the act was reversed. Peel could have and did get away with acting in this way many a number of times but his failure was that he did not know when to stop his ever increasing liberal actions that to his colleagues on the backbenches smacked of democracy. Peel and the liberal Tories were children of the reform of parliament, the reformed Tories, the problem was that the rest of the party took a reactionary approach to the reform act, one that Peel foolishly thought he could ignore. Would the Conservative party have split without then potato famine and other economic factors leading up to the repeal? Yes, would it have split without the actions of Peel? Eventually yes, as rot had already set in before Peel came to office but it is unlikely it would have happened so soon. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    Dixon put forward two main proposals: 1) holding a plebiscite through the entire state, one region at a time, or 2) only holding a plebiscite in regions which were doubtful those that would definitely vote for accession to India or Pakistan would be allocated to those countries without a vote.

  2. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    "The Lord will provide" and therefore that to intervene in the "lot" of the poor was contrary to religious doctrine; the poor man improved his position with God's help through hard work and doing his duty. This explains in part the attitude of "Laissez Faire" adopted in "handling" the crisis.

  1. How far were the Anti Corn Law League responsible for Peel's repeal of the ...

    The Anti-Corn-Law League modelled themselves on the Irish Catholic Association led by Daniel O'Connell. Between 1841 and 1845 the League grew into a strong political force. Creating discontent, they resorted to encouraging factory-owning ACLL members to cut wages and lower working hours.

  2. To What Extent Was Peel's Reorganisation of the Tory Party responsible for the election ...

    as the opportunity to stand loyal, in her opinion to the previous Prime Minister. Eventually Melbourne resumed office for a further two years before a of 'no confidence' removed him, and the Conservatives were able to enter government at the peak of their political strength.

  1. Conservative Victory of 1941, Peel and the Weakness of the Whigs.

    The Whigs further caused their own downfall by eliminating the pressure groups which had originally co-operated with the reforming legislation, especially the Evangelicals, Radicals and the Benthamites. Overall, the Whigs were clearly very weak, and never had a strong support to which they could build on, yet under Lord Melbourne,

  2. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Though Peel didn't help the situation by bringing out a lot of controversial reform. The First piece of legislation he brought out while in government was the re-introduction of the Income tax. This in the past had only been used in war time Britain.

  1. "The objective of establishing the Conservative Party as a party of government explains most ...

    The statement is a General sweeping statement taken from a book entitled " The conservative party from peel to Thatcher", suggesting that the statement is merely for informative purposes. We also know that Robert Blake has devoted a lot of his time and life in studying Disraeli making him very credible.

  2. The Corn Laws

    They were factory owners in England. The members of this movement were mainly middle-class manufacturers, merchants, bankers and traders. They wanted the Corn Laws to be repealed so that they could sell more goods both in Britain and overseas.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work