• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the liberal party win a landslide victory in the 1906 General Election?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

October 7 2004 Anna Carlisle Why did the liberal party win a landslide victory in the 1906 General Election? In the 1906 general election, the Liberal party dramatically increased their number of seats from 184, in 1900 to 400. In contrast, the Conservative party, who had dominated British politics in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries lost nearly half their seats in 1906, decreasing from 402 to 157. A combination of Liberal strengths and Conservative weaknesses, as well as other circumstances at this time meant that this sudden change occurred. The Conservative party introduced two new acts just before this General Election which greatly decreased their popularity. The Education Act of 1902 was an attempt by the conservatives to improve national efficiency: Britain must improve the health and well-being of the nation if it was to remain a leading world power. The act abolished school boards, which meant that taxpayers funded primary school education. Although this was a successful policy, (attendance at school increased from 94,000 in 1905 to 200,000 by 1914) it angered non-conformists who were outraged that their taxes were being used to fund church schools. In fact, the Act was branded 'Rome on Rates', as the Catholic Church was benefiting from taxes being paid by anti-Catholic citizens: Balfour soon had to control a revolt as 7000 people refused to pay their taxes. ...read more.

Middle

This starling revelation led people to question why Britain, an apparently strong nation could produce such a large amount of unhealthy young men. The war also created the scandal of concentration camps: in order to achieve victory, the British army forced citizens into these camps and the poor conditions led to a widespread outbreak of fatal diseases. News of British actions horrified many citizens. Moreover, the Conservatives allowed Chinese labourers to work in South Africa to dig in gold and diamond mines for very low wages. This also appalled the British citizens: many of the working class were scared that Britain may import cheaper, foreign workers, which would make their wages fall. Although these scandals were not major reasons why the Conservatives lost support, they added to other party weaknesses which affected them in the general election. Balfour opposed the 'Chinese slavery' but did nothing to stop it, which only added to the idea that he had a lack of interest in 'the masses.' Additionally, the Conservatives were further criticised for their handling of the Taff Vale crisis in 1901. The Conservatives allowed The Taff Vale Railway Company to sue the Trade Union for loss of income, after workers went on strike. The union were forced to pay �23,000 in compensation and the event made the right to strike practically useless as Trade Unions' powers were decreased. ...read more.

Conclusion

In contrast, the Liberal party had significantly improved their plans since the Conservative victory in 1900. The Liberals took part in a secret deal with the newly established Labour Representation Committee, which greatly increased their number of possible seats. Known as the 'Lib-Lab Pact', they agreed that no liberal candidate would stand if a LRC candidate had a better chance of getting elected. This meant that the combined votes of the Liberal and Labour party would be greater than the number of Conservative seats and they would be defeated: both the Liberal and Labour candidates would campaign for an anti-conservative vote. This pact was certainly a strength of the Liberal party which led to them gaining a land-slide victory in 1906. However, other strengths of the Liberal party, such as campaigning against the Licensing and Education Acts were only evident because the Conservatives had made the mistake of introducing these reforms in the first place. Other Conservative weaknesses such as poor leadership and the split over Tariff reform placed the party at a major disadvantage so the Liberals appeared more attractive, when compared. Overall, although the Liberals did unite together for a number of policies and took part in the Lib-Lab pact to gain support, it seems the Conservative weaknesses played a more important role in the landslide victory as its mistakes gave something to unite the Liberals and the contrast in organisation within the parties made the Liberals more appealing. . ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The first World War killed the Liberal Party" how far do you agree with ...

    However, the Labour Party only really became successful after the First World War and their popularity before it was very limited. The Liberal reforming programme stile much of Labours momentum and people had no need to vote Labour as Liberals had carried out most of their policies to appease the working class.

  2. 'Conservative dominance in British Politics between 1885and 1902 was due to conservative strengths rather ...

    Another important factor in Conservative supremacy was the structure of the party. It had improved rapidly after the 1880 election. As a result, the party was able to take advantage of the opportunities that recent political changes had brought to the conservatives.

  1. Why the Labour Party overtook the Liberal Party

    This demonstrates the fact that the party still had a way to go before it appealed to all sections of the population, but this weakness was overshadowed by the dramatic gains made in industrial regions in 1922. It was no longer a relatively ineffective and insecurely based force - the

  2. Why did the General Strike of 1926 fail and what were the effects the ...

    action for political ends, the strict separation of the political and the industrial spheres, the notion of solving Labours' problems within the capitalist system and finally the acceptance of the common interest between wage-labour and employers. For Burgess, the idea of class collaboration, which was symbolised in the Mond-Turner talks especially, marked a sharp watershed.

  1. Account for the overwhelming Liberal Landslide in the 1906 General Election.

    would not stand against each other in certain seats and that the Liberals could have access to the Labour movements funding. This meant that the Liberals to further exploit the system to squeeze as many votes as possible without being wholly representative of some constituencies.

  2. Liberal success in 1906 owed more to conservative failure than liberal organization, To what ...

    However to mine for gold you need a workforce and he decided that Chinese Labour was their best answer.

  1. The Rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    Principally it went to the Janissaries, the military arm of the government, Throughout the seventeenth century; the Janissaries slowly took over the military and administrative posts in the government and passed these offices onto their sons, often by bribing corrupt officials.

  2. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    Both were unsuccessful10. After this initial decade of keen involvement in Kashmir, having reached a stalemate, the UN pretty much stepped out of the picture. However, it did leave a very important legacy: the Security Council resolutions declaring the Kashmiri people should decide the future of the State.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work