• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did The Liberals Win a Landslide Victory In The 1906 General Elections?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did The Liberals Win a Landslide Victory In The 1906 General Elections! There are many controversial issues that lost the 1906 election for the Conservative party. These issues all had a significant effect on the eventual out-come of the election in one way or another. One of the most important factors was the issue of Tariff reform. This was an electoral disaster for the conservative party. Joseph Chamberlain a well-known politician called for an end to Free Trade. Parties saw Free trade as Sacred, it was an article of faith for both parties and it defined their policies. Chamberlain had examined Britain's main competitors (e.g. Germany, USA and Japan). They all seemed to use a system of tariffs to protect their rising Domestic industry. The main argument was that tariffs would enable the economy to grow and expand and there had been growing concern on Britain's ever failing economy. Tariffs would provide closer ties with Empire and help Britain maintain its position as a leading power in the world. Many saw this as not just an economic argument but it was linked to the empire and its ideals. Chamberlain argued that he would produce 3/4 million extra jobs and money for pensions. It would also safe guard jobs and British companies. ...read more.


By doing this, these two parties are thereby making sure that the Conservative Party does not return to an extended run in power. The 1902 Education Act was another big factor in the Liberal Victory of 1906 election. This was a major piece of welfare, again backed by Balfour and his failing Conservative government. Britain is in a massive Economic competition from USA and Germany and both of the nations provided secondary and technical education for their working classes. This meant that their workers were able to bring out more thereby able to produce more. Without this secondary education act being granted, Britain would continue to fall behind other countries. The act had two main elements, it allowed Voluntary Schools to be funded by the rates and it abolished School Boards. This meant that schools were to be run by local council education committees from 1902. This act alienated the non-conformists because they felt that church schools shouldn't be funded from the rates, they wanted church schools to be abolished and because of low funding this was bound to happen, but was rescued by this act. By agreeing to this act the conservative government had alienated them selves from the vote of the non-conformists. They waged a national campaign against the act; some non-conformists didn't pay the rights and faced prison sentence. ...read more.


The state of the Conservative party seemed to justify people claims that they were a party in the decline. The departure of the famous hardworking Party members didn't do very much to help the parties cause. The departure of Richard Middleton marked a fall in organisation, which undermined their ability to fight a good campaign. More serious for the party was the fading support of the party. Their campaign was ineffective as they seemed disorganised and not united as the Liberals were. I conclude that all this incidences didn't do much to help the conservative aim for re-election but on the other hand spurred the Liberals on with more force. The Liberal victory showed that the Conservative party had been in power too long and their methods for dealing with some situations are old and ineffective. It also showed that the party was in decline and in need of some change and a serious reorganisation. All this gave the Liberals a serious chance, which they gladly took. Many historians would argue that the Liberals exploited well the failure of the Conservative party, rather than the victory of the Liberals. This because turnover seats were not caused by a mass conversion from Conservatism to Liberalism but because a large number of people who had abstained from voting were forced to vote against the Liberals and the only party available were the Liberals. Chris Ibekwe 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Consider the arguments for and against retaining first-past-the-post for general elections

    Indeed, they correlate with a broader debate over the exact purpose of national elections. Is the priority choosing an effective executive or competent legislature? Should each voter have the right to a local MP or is it more important that the political parties get their fair share of MPs?

  2. Critically evaluate/assess the achievements of Sergei Witte and their consequences for the social groups ...

    Industrial output; Annual Production (millions of tons) Coal pig iron oil grain 1880 3.2 0.42 0.5 34 1890 5.9 0.89 3.9 36 1900 16.1 2.66 10.2 56 1910 26.8 2.99 9.4 74 Witte returned to the forefront in 1905, however, when he was called upon by the Tsar to negotiate on end to the (Russo Japanese war)

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 fail and what were the effects the ...

    as the long-established faith in a regulated system of voluntary collective bargaining. Thus he described the shift to the right of the whole Labour movement and the isolation of the Marxist left more as a further strengthening of already familiar principles than as a significant watershed.

  2. Account for the overwhelming Liberal Landslide in the 1906 General Election.

    The Unionists had been in power continuously since the 1880's, the British public had become weary of the same old approaches to the problems of social reforms etc. The public now looked for fresh ideas, which came in the form of "New Liberalism" advocated by the Liberal Party.

  1. To What Extent Was Peel's Reorganisation of the Tory Party responsible for the election ...

    Whilst being less important than Peel's reorganisation of his party, these fortunate events were vital in asserting his position in British politics. Coupled with the new 'Conservatism' such fortunate circumstances would not have occurred without being capitalised upon. Thus, the impact of this second factor is dependent upon the success of the first.

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    The extremes that did exist were not as marked as those in South Africa, and the fact that four churches encompassed 75% of the population made united church activity much more facile. Namibia also had more focused goals from the start.

  1. Liberal success in 1906 owed more to conservative failure than liberal organization, To what ...

    It was the effects of this war, which lead to the lack of support for the Conservative Party, and as the Liberal leader Henry Campbell-Bannerman suggested that Salisbury's government had used "methods of barbarism," this gained Liberal support. Balfour's government should have also realised their mistakes when they decided to

  2. The Rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    By 1400 they had managed to extend their influence over much of Antolia and the Byzantine Empire in Eastern Europe: Macedonia and Bulgaria. In 1402 the Ottomans moved their capital to Edirne in Europe, where they could threaten the Byzantine's last stronghold, Constantinople.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work