• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did The Liberals Win a Landslide Victory In The 1906 General Elections?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did The Liberals Win a Landslide Victory In The 1906 General Elections! There are many controversial issues that lost the 1906 election for the Conservative party. These issues all had a significant effect on the eventual out-come of the election in one way or another. One of the most important factors was the issue of Tariff reform. This was an electoral disaster for the conservative party. Joseph Chamberlain a well-known politician called for an end to Free Trade. Parties saw Free trade as Sacred, it was an article of faith for both parties and it defined their policies. Chamberlain had examined Britain's main competitors (e.g. Germany, USA and Japan). They all seemed to use a system of tariffs to protect their rising Domestic industry. The main argument was that tariffs would enable the economy to grow and expand and there had been growing concern on Britain's ever failing economy. Tariffs would provide closer ties with Empire and help Britain maintain its position as a leading power in the world. Many saw this as not just an economic argument but it was linked to the empire and its ideals. Chamberlain argued that he would produce 3/4 million extra jobs and money for pensions. It would also safe guard jobs and British companies. ...read more.


By doing this, these two parties are thereby making sure that the Conservative Party does not return to an extended run in power. The 1902 Education Act was another big factor in the Liberal Victory of 1906 election. This was a major piece of welfare, again backed by Balfour and his failing Conservative government. Britain is in a massive Economic competition from USA and Germany and both of the nations provided secondary and technical education for their working classes. This meant that their workers were able to bring out more thereby able to produce more. Without this secondary education act being granted, Britain would continue to fall behind other countries. The act had two main elements, it allowed Voluntary Schools to be funded by the rates and it abolished School Boards. This meant that schools were to be run by local council education committees from 1902. This act alienated the non-conformists because they felt that church schools shouldn't be funded from the rates, they wanted church schools to be abolished and because of low funding this was bound to happen, but was rescued by this act. By agreeing to this act the conservative government had alienated them selves from the vote of the non-conformists. They waged a national campaign against the act; some non-conformists didn't pay the rights and faced prison sentence. ...read more.


The state of the Conservative party seemed to justify people claims that they were a party in the decline. The departure of the famous hardworking Party members didn't do very much to help the parties cause. The departure of Richard Middleton marked a fall in organisation, which undermined their ability to fight a good campaign. More serious for the party was the fading support of the party. Their campaign was ineffective as they seemed disorganised and not united as the Liberals were. I conclude that all this incidences didn't do much to help the conservative aim for re-election but on the other hand spurred the Liberals on with more force. The Liberal victory showed that the Conservative party had been in power too long and their methods for dealing with some situations are old and ineffective. It also showed that the party was in decline and in need of some change and a serious reorganisation. All this gave the Liberals a serious chance, which they gladly took. Many historians would argue that the Liberals exploited well the failure of the Conservative party, rather than the victory of the Liberals. This because turnover seats were not caused by a mass conversion from Conservatism to Liberalism but because a large number of people who had abstained from voting were forced to vote against the Liberals and the only party available were the Liberals. Chris Ibekwe 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    Talks between Kosygin, Shastri and Ayub Khan were scheduled to start in Tashkent on 3 January 1966.Initially, and indeed until virtually the last moment there was little hope of the talks generating any kind of agreement- the two both parties' positions were simply too far apart.

  2. To What Extent Was Peel's Reorganisation of the Tory Party responsible for the election ...

    popular Reformations Bill which was meeting public demand after the wave of reform in Europe. Furthermore, the Whigs themselves were heavily divided. It had been the Parliamentary Reform alone that had united Grey's cabinet; other policies had been contended yet suppressed between them.

  1. Critically evaluate/assess the achievements of Sergei Witte and their consequences for the social groups ...

    Industrial output; Annual Production (millions of tons) Coal pig iron oil grain 1880 3.2 0.42 0.5 34 1890 5.9 0.89 3.9 36 1900 16.1 2.66 10.2 56 1910 26.8 2.99 9.4 74 Witte returned to the forefront in 1905, however, when he was called upon by the Tsar to negotiate on end to the (Russo Japanese war)

  2. The Labour victory of 2005 was unusual. To what extent is this true?

    The Liberal Democrats had many fewer seats than their share of the vote among the electorate justified - an exactly proportional distribution would have given them 142. Labour were massively over-represented: a proportional allocation would have given them 227 seats rather than 356.

  1. Why did the Liberals win the 1906 general election?

    The National Passive Resistance Committee was formed by John Clifford and members were both Liberal and Labour supporters who campaigned against the act. By 1906, 170 men had gone to prison as a result of refusing to pay the school taxes.

  2. To what extent did the Conservatives lose the election rather than the Liberals win ...

    In the run up to the election the Liberals had pulled together. Foreign policy was no longer an area of disagreement and at that point Home Rule for Ireland was not a prominent issue, and so they lost no votes over this.

  1. Access the main reasons for the Liberal Victory of 1906 (45)

    the new crown colonies, Lord Milner, also caused much revulsion in the UK. Workers were often kept in appalling conditions, received only a small wage and were forbidden to socialise with the local population. Some believe the Chinese slavery issue can be seen as the climax of public hostility against the war.

  2. Assess the Main Reasons for the Liberal Victory of 1906 Election

    Many of the above reasons can be linked to the Prime Minster at the time Balfour. Many historians believe he alone brought down the Conservatives. By 1906 he had not done well causing problems for everyone. He let Chamberlain go on with his speech which broke the party without stopping him or taking action.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work