• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did The Liberals Win a Landslide Victory In The 1906 General Elections?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did The Liberals Win a Landslide Victory In The 1906 General Elections! There are many controversial issues that lost the 1906 election for the Conservative party. These issues all had a significant effect on the eventual out-come of the election in one way or another. One of the most important factors was the issue of Tariff reform. This was an electoral disaster for the conservative party. Joseph Chamberlain a well-known politician called for an end to Free Trade. Parties saw Free trade as Sacred, it was an article of faith for both parties and it defined their policies. Chamberlain had examined Britain's main competitors (e.g. Germany, USA and Japan). They all seemed to use a system of tariffs to protect their rising Domestic industry. The main argument was that tariffs would enable the economy to grow and expand and there had been growing concern on Britain's ever failing economy. Tariffs would provide closer ties with Empire and help Britain maintain its position as a leading power in the world. Many saw this as not just an economic argument but it was linked to the empire and its ideals. Chamberlain argued that he would produce 3/4 million extra jobs and money for pensions. It would also safe guard jobs and British companies. ...read more.


By doing this, these two parties are thereby making sure that the Conservative Party does not return to an extended run in power. The 1902 Education Act was another big factor in the Liberal Victory of 1906 election. This was a major piece of welfare, again backed by Balfour and his failing Conservative government. Britain is in a massive Economic competition from USA and Germany and both of the nations provided secondary and technical education for their working classes. This meant that their workers were able to bring out more thereby able to produce more. Without this secondary education act being granted, Britain would continue to fall behind other countries. The act had two main elements, it allowed Voluntary Schools to be funded by the rates and it abolished School Boards. This meant that schools were to be run by local council education committees from 1902. This act alienated the non-conformists because they felt that church schools shouldn't be funded from the rates, they wanted church schools to be abolished and because of low funding this was bound to happen, but was rescued by this act. By agreeing to this act the conservative government had alienated them selves from the vote of the non-conformists. They waged a national campaign against the act; some non-conformists didn't pay the rights and faced prison sentence. ...read more.


The state of the Conservative party seemed to justify people claims that they were a party in the decline. The departure of the famous hardworking Party members didn't do very much to help the parties cause. The departure of Richard Middleton marked a fall in organisation, which undermined their ability to fight a good campaign. More serious for the party was the fading support of the party. Their campaign was ineffective as they seemed disorganised and not united as the Liberals were. I conclude that all this incidences didn't do much to help the conservative aim for re-election but on the other hand spurred the Liberals on with more force. The Liberal victory showed that the Conservative party had been in power too long and their methods for dealing with some situations are old and ineffective. It also showed that the party was in decline and in need of some change and a serious reorganisation. All this gave the Liberals a serious chance, which they gladly took. Many historians would argue that the Liberals exploited well the failure of the Conservative party, rather than the victory of the Liberals. This because turnover seats were not caused by a mass conversion from Conservatism to Liberalism but because a large number of people who had abstained from voting were forced to vote against the Liberals and the only party available were the Liberals. Chris Ibekwe 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did the Liberals win a landslide election in 1906?

    good employer to many electors, or had led the House of Commons or fought in the Crimea."

  2. Critically evaluate/assess the achievements of Sergei Witte and their consequences for the social groups ...

    Chris Corin (p78) When he was appointed chairman of Russian council of ministers in 1905 during the Russian revolution of 1905, He was Convinced that Russia's interests in the Far East were best served by commerce and railroad-building, not belligerence, Witte strongly opposed the drift to war with Japan over (among other problems)

  1. Apartheid in South Africa.

    at the Sharpeville massacre so he may have been either lying because he wanted or to forced to lie to keep up the appearance that the South African government had good intentions and so that the devastating results had no effect on their reputation or popularity.

  2. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    * Green-peace (protecting the resources of the sea) * Anti-pollution acts * Oil spills * Natural disasters * Hunger / starvation * Below the breadline o According the annual report, China's control over the Korean market, Japan, Hong Kong and Taiwan resulted in the reduction of South African exports from 11.3 million in 1999 to 3.3 million in 2002.

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    India was certainly not going to give up through diplomacy what Pakistan had failed to secure in war11. Swaran Singh, the Indian Foreign minister, had declared in General Assembly that Kashmir was an integral part of India and that its future was not negotiable.

  2. Why Did Labour win the landslide of 1945?

    Coalmines predominantly in the North of England and Wales was a way of life and for this to be nationalised it generated a big support from these parts of the UK The Labour party unlike before now had experience. Clement Atlee was deputy Prime minister to Churchill in the coalition Government during the war.

  1. Did Gladstone Unite or Divide the Liberals?

    Gladstone became Prime Minister in December 1868, his first cabinet reflected the diverse composition of the Liberal Party. It contained three former Peelites (Gladstone, Cardwell and De Grey), with three Liberals (Childers, Goschen and Bruce) and two Radicals (Lowe and Bright.)

  2. Introduction and Company Background.

    There is around 3 millions of labors force in total including 1.4 millions local labors and 2 millions foreign labors. It is believed that Dongguan is rich in human resources. * Geographical Advantages Dongguan is situated to the east bank of Zhujiang River, located about 55 miles south of Guangzhou,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work