• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Provisional Government fail to hold power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Provisional Government fail to hold power? After the February Revolution, which saw the fall of the tsar, a Provisional Government was set-up. It was comprised of the Petrograd Soviet and the representative assembly, which existed under the tsar. The new Government was a weak and unstable grouping of politicians trying to desperately gain some control over events. The Provisional Government faced the same problems as the tsar and was unable to offer any effective solutions and as a result lacked both authority and support from the start. Famine, disease and death were spreading throughout the empire as the Russian Government continued to aid France against the militia of Germany. The decision to continue the war was perhaps a crucial factor, sapping the strengths and diverting the energies of government whose hold on power was tenuous in the first place. The Provisional Government had a more fundamental problem, which led to its fall in October. ...read more.

Middle

Disorder spread throughout the countryside with many landowners finding themselves on the receiving end of the peasants' anger. The Government was clearly unable to control what was happening in the country. More than anything else the summer offensive swung many people to the Bolsheviks, the only major party which stood uncompromisingly for an immediate end to the war, and who had adopted the slogan, " Peace, Bread and Land". Had the Provisional Government adopted a similar policy it would not have led to its downfall and the Bolshevik seizure of power in October. What part did the revolutionary movement play in the collapse of the autocracy? The work of revolutionary parties had little effect on the collapse of autocracy as the outbreak of the war had initially cut across a revolutionary movement, which was developing in Russia in July/August 1914. From having the support of 80 percent of the active workers, the revolutionary group, the Bolsheviks, who opposed the imperialist war, were driven underground, as backward layers of the working class, mobilized by the war, embraced the ideas of patriotism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The tsar was politically inept and his decision to take command of the armed forces proved to worsen his reputation amongst the Russian people, as he was seen as being responsible for Russia's military defeats. By the beginning of 1917 there were demonstrations in Petrograd over food shortages, which were increasingly aimed against the tsar, and the radicalisation of the industrial workers and peasants became more significant. Demonstrations later rose to quarter of a million and the army were asked to put them down by opening fire on the crowds. Army leaders refused to do so as they were not content with the progress Russia was making in the war. This decision put a lot of pressure on the tsar who soon found that his supporters were no longer willing to save the government as they had lost their faith in it. In conclusion the end on the tsarist regime had not been brought about by the actions of revolutionary groups, as it had collapsed rather than been overthrown. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning

    This would of added extra fuel to the prospect revolution. This point shows that if the provisional government chose to make decisions to try and fix the problems in Russia, they may not have failed and could of survived. The Petrograd Soviets were a group that shared dual power with the Provisional government.

  2. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    The value of this book is that it provides multiple views on each aspect of the Russian Revolution. Each view is countered with an argument from the opposing view, allowing the reader to get an enhanced analysis. This book is also valuable because it is written very recently, thus making use of all the new information just released.

  1. To what extent was the Great War responsible for the collapse of the Provisional ...

    Historians vary on the importance of Kerensky; Lenin himself said he was simply invited into the government as a figurehead to create a fa´┐Żade of popular approval whilst others such a G. Buchanan, British Ambassador in Petrograd, place greater importance on his position, making him a key figure in the running of the country.

  2. It was the weakness of the provisional government that brought the October revolution about ...

    The provisional government had little or no control of Russia's army. The soldiers were ordered to set up committees to have control over all weapons and other equipment, leaving the provisional government all but powerless. However, they did gain some vital support during the July Days.

  1. Why did the Communists and other revolutionary left-wing groups fail to seize power in ...

    The army under the orders of Freidrich Ebert crushed the uprising, but this did not stop the determination of the left wing as they came back again in March 1920. March 1920 produced an uprising in reaction to the Kapp Putsch.

  2. What was Chartism and why did it fail

    We have to take a step back to look into the Chartist period to understand what contributed to its failure. The Chartists were radical in their demands for that time and truly had the odds stacked against them. They had no support in the commons and the MP's themselves were

  1. Was the collapse of the provisional government inevitable

    they did, they seized land in the country side and when the landlords refused to obey, they were killed and houses burnt down. Although by calling land reforms, the provisional government could appease some of the masses of peasants; it displeased the landlords and liberals (which included themselves)

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    Its great contribution lay in arousing the people's consciousness and preparing for the unity of the revolutionary forces11. Furthermore, The May Fourth Movement promoted the spreading of Marxist and nationalist ideologies throughout China, and prepared the political foundation for the establishment of the Communist Party of China.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work