• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Provisional Government fail to hold power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did the Provisional Government fail to hold power? After the February Revolution, which saw the fall of the tsar, a Provisional Government was set-up. It was comprised of the Petrograd Soviet and the representative assembly, which existed under the tsar. The new Government was a weak and unstable grouping of politicians trying to desperately gain some control over events. The Provisional Government faced the same problems as the tsar and was unable to offer any effective solutions and as a result lacked both authority and support from the start. Famine, disease and death were spreading throughout the empire as the Russian Government continued to aid France against the militia of Germany. The decision to continue the war was perhaps a crucial factor, sapping the strengths and diverting the energies of government whose hold on power was tenuous in the first place. The Provisional Government had a more fundamental problem, which led to its fall in October. ...read more.

Middle

Disorder spread throughout the countryside with many landowners finding themselves on the receiving end of the peasants' anger. The Government was clearly unable to control what was happening in the country. More than anything else the summer offensive swung many people to the Bolsheviks, the only major party which stood uncompromisingly for an immediate end to the war, and who had adopted the slogan, " Peace, Bread and Land". Had the Provisional Government adopted a similar policy it would not have led to its downfall and the Bolshevik seizure of power in October. What part did the revolutionary movement play in the collapse of the autocracy? The work of revolutionary parties had little effect on the collapse of autocracy as the outbreak of the war had initially cut across a revolutionary movement, which was developing in Russia in July/August 1914. From having the support of 80 percent of the active workers, the revolutionary group, the Bolsheviks, who opposed the imperialist war, were driven underground, as backward layers of the working class, mobilized by the war, embraced the ideas of patriotism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The tsar was politically inept and his decision to take command of the armed forces proved to worsen his reputation amongst the Russian people, as he was seen as being responsible for Russia's military defeats. By the beginning of 1917 there were demonstrations in Petrograd over food shortages, which were increasingly aimed against the tsar, and the radicalisation of the industrial workers and peasants became more significant. Demonstrations later rose to quarter of a million and the army were asked to put them down by opening fire on the crowds. Army leaders refused to do so as they were not content with the progress Russia was making in the war. This decision put a lot of pressure on the tsar who soon found that his supporters were no longer willing to save the government as they had lost their faith in it. In conclusion the end on the tsarist regime had not been brought about by the actions of revolutionary groups, as it had collapsed rather than been overthrown. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning

    This would of added extra fuel to the prospect revolution. This point shows that if the provisional government chose to make decisions to try and fix the problems in Russia, they may not have failed and could of survived. The Petrograd Soviets were a group that shared dual power with the Provisional government.

  2. Why Did Revolutions Break Out so Widely Across Europe in 1848 and Why Did ...

    was particularly poor and bread prices in France doubled in that one year. Considering that the typical citizen is thought to have spent 70% of their income on food alone, this represented a considerable reduction in standards of living. At the same time, the working classes were suffering unemployment in

  1. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    The value of this book is that it provides multiple views on each aspect of the Russian Revolution. Each view is countered with an argument from the opposing view, allowing the reader to get an enhanced analysis. This book is also valuable because it is written very recently, thus making use of all the new information just released.

  2. The Rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    Selim II reigned for only eight years, but he set a precedent, which was followed for the next two centuries. It was because of this that some argue that the Empire and Caliphate that had once stood against the advancing Europe slowly crumbled under its pressure.

  1. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    This congress was important not only because all Russian socialist groups attended but also because it marked the important split among the Social Democrats into the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. Both the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks agreed to overthrow Czardom, transform Russia into a democratic bourgeois republic and in turn overthrow it by a socialist revolution.

  2. What was Chartism and why did it fail

    He himself was a sympathiser of the movement but was also called to be a special constable this produced a quandary within himself with the way Chartism progressed and ultimately fell short of its goals. In the 21st century it is difficult to understand why their demands were not met as we take such rights for granted.

  1. Was the collapse of the provisional government inevitable

    they did, they seized land in the country side and when the landlords refused to obey, they were killed and houses burnt down. Although by calling land reforms, the provisional government could appease some of the masses of peasants; it displeased the landlords and liberals (which included themselves)

  2. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    with a 'people's militia' o The granting of full civil and religious freedoms o A commitment to the convening of a constituent assembly However, the agreed changes did not touch on the critical issues of the war and the land.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work