• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why do Liberals think Democracy can Prevent War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why do liberals think democracy can prevent war? What are the limits to their view? Liberals believe democracy can prevent war because they believe that the nature of democratic state is less belligerent than that of more authoritarian and totalitarian forms of government. Since democracy adheres to the principles of popular sovereignty and majority rule in which authority is vested in the people (or their representatives) and a majority is needed to make decisions, agreement on a decision such as deciding if to wage war is not easy and is subject to debate, not to the whims of a monarch or a dictator. Immanuel Kant (1795), a very influential 18th century German philosopher and political thinker, explained this line of reasoning in his essay "Perpetual Peace": If the consent of the people is required in order to decide that war should be declared, nothing is more natural than that they would be very cautious in commencing such a poor game, [ . . . ...read more.

Middle

Liberals believe democracies don't fight each other because of their belief in the "democratic peace theory", first formulated by Kant (1795) in "Perpetual Peace". Kant's (1795) theory stated that a majority of the people would never vote to go to war, unless in self-defense. Therefore, if all nations were republics, it would end war, because there would be no aggressors. (as cited in Doyle, 1983, p. 84) Alternate explanations have been proposed since, but the modern theory is principally the empirical claim that democracies rarely or never fight. Although there are few minor exceptions to the theory, such as the Spanish-American War in the late 19th century or the Kargil War between India and Pakistan in the late 20th century, history shows the theory to be very accurate. As in the case of WWII, the countries with democratic governments, which were the Allied Powers, collectively fought against Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperialist Japan. ...read more.

Conclusion

Economic interdependence is another significant reason as to why democracies don't go to war with each other. Since democratic states are strong states economically, they acknowledge that to maintain their wealth, they need the trade they interact with other nations - especially other democratic strong states. They cannot do so in a state of hostility or outright war. In the words of 19th century French economist Frederik Bastiat, '"If goods cannot cross borders, armies will."'(As cited in Jervis, 2008, p. 385) Countries prefer to bolster their economic and political wealth through peaceful means, but that doesn't mean that they won't resort to violent means to achieve those ends. This is how the democratic peace theory postulated by liberal theorists is limited: Democracies would fight each other if it is absolutely necessary. Even though democracies waging war against each other has been a rare occurrence throughout history and is always unlikely, there's always the possibility that two democratic states could have some lesser military conflict, if not full-out war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    On the 2nd September 1798, we had the Maltese uprising against the French. In fact this entire rebel started at Mdina, with the murdering of a French auctioneer. Than the French were confronted at harassment by people from Zebbug and Attard, that went to Mdina passing through Siggiewi.

  2. Define Politics and democracy in your own words

    These are expanded on in the regions by the addition of the Scottish National Party in Scotland, Plaid Cymru in Wales and the various Unionist parties and Sein Fein of Northern Ireland. In terms of electoral success, Britain has frequently been referred as a two-party state; similar to America.

  1. A Modernizing Monarch

    The Ministry of Finance supported railroad development, which facilitated vital export activity, but it was cautious and moderate in its foreign ventures. The ministry also founded the Peasant Land Bank in 1882 to enable enterprising farmers to acquire more land.

  2. American Democracy: An Ongoing Experiment

    The two parties in power do not adequately address the political spectrum and thus contradict themselves. The Republican party, through public relations and its members' voting records, has established itself as a conservative organization. Translated to the American political system, they favor a direct translation of the Constitution.

  1. A new democracy will face many difficulties in deciding its new Governmental structure.

    (This is an example of how the President in times of crisis can be expedient). This makes for a more democratic system as Congress, which can claim to have a greater mandate due to the size of personnel, is directly involved in every action within the United States.

  2. Is Legalization a Realistic Alternative to the War on Marijuana?

    Many countries do not have laws restricting private parties from growing the hemp plant. Bugliosi has said that it is legal to grown marijuana in Canada, Australia, France, Great Britain, Netherlands, Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Russia, Romania, India, China and Korea among others (7).

  1. The two countries of India and Pakistan have been waging war against one another ...

    What he said when asked about the big problem of how to determine which parts of Indian would become Pakistan, is often told to children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren. The words are continuously passed down through generations when one is talking about the greatness of Jinnah, " I don't care

  2. Notes on Citizenship and Democracy.

    Chapter 12: Human Rights. 1. After WW2 the UN was more concerned on human rights. There was more promotion and protection of these rights. It was a universal declaration of human right that put into equality all races. Unfortunately the UN failed in the attempt to make these rights effective world-wide.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work