• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why the Labour Party overtook the Liberal Party

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

When they first emerged in 1900, the Labour Representation Committee was a relatively small political group pressuring for the labour cause. There seemed to be no inevitability, at the time, for their rise, as the eventual Labour party, to become Britain's second biggest party over the Liberals, and providing competition for the dominant Conservatives. This essay shall determine the factors that caused change in Labour's increasing successes within 1914 and 1924. These factors include economic and social determinants in the country, contribution from key individuals, measures taken by the Labour Party themselves and the effects of the war that also, significantly, was a cause of one of the most important factors: the increasing divisions and disintegration of the Liberal Party. When war broke out in 1914, the Liberals governed Britain and held 261 seats in Parliament. Yet, by 1918, it was clear that the Liberal Party's position was dispelled and had been, according to Trevor Wilson, "reduced to ruins". The outbreak of war had jeopardised the existence of a party whose apparent principles were international conciliation, personal liberty and social reform. For a Liberal government to lead Britain into war, and to direct a wartime administration, was almost a contradiction of terms. War appeared to be, for the Party, one of the biggest threats of eliminating liberalism as a coherent political force. It alienated groups who were previously linked to the party, e.g. the religious dynamic of Nonconformity, the National Brotherhood Movement. ...read more.

Middle

The effects on the nation's economy had expanded the importance of the trade unions, and thus stimulated their political consciousness. This of course correspondingly enhanced the position of the Labour Party - who had always gained much of its limited importance from its links with organised labour. A significant constituent that is also connected to this is the case of parliamentary reform in the form of the Representation of the People Act. This raised the electorate from 8 million to 21 million, including males over 21, many of whom were poorer working-class males in industrial regions, and (for the first time) women over 30. This increases the representation of industrial areas, and was now no longer just applicable to householders and landlords. One can see that support for the Liberal party in industrial areas collapsed. Mining districts provided 39 of the 86 London gains for Labour in the 1922 General Election, while 28 more came from Glasgow, Greater London, Tyneside, the Clyde and Sheffield. Glasgow returns provided the most remarkable result, with labour taking ten of the seats it contested, usually on large swings. Mining areas certainly helped the overall growth of the party's popularity in the polls - the Labour vote rose from 22.2 per cent in the 1918 'coupon' election to 29.4 per cent in 1922. Yet, the seats where Labour lost heavily in 1922 came in two main categories: agricultural seats, especially in the South Midlands, together with the textile districts of East Lancashire and West Yorkshire. ...read more.

Conclusion

Labour was larger than both factions of the Liberal Party combined. In 1924, Labour held 191 seats, and 30.5 per cent of the total vote. This is where they formed their first administration, albeit a minority one which lasted less than a year. Throughout the 1920s, the Labour party's electoral strength increased while that of the Liberals' waned. In 1929, labour became the largest single party, and it was in 1945 when they finally held the top position as a majority government. In conclusion, it is clear that there are many reasons that contribute to the overtaking of the Liberals by the Labour Party within this decade. In my opinion, the most important factor would be the outbreak of war, due to the repercussions it held for both Labour and the Liberal Party. The Liberals suffered from deep divisions within its own ranks, and this gave Labour an opportunity to benefit in political power. War also meant that the economic situation of Britain was changing, and this led to a social turnaround, with the increasing importance of trade unions. The effects of the war on the population were also significant, as it led many to believe that Labour was a better alternative to the wartime governments, which disillusioned many across the different social classes. Electoral success for Labour was also due to the changing policies of the party, and the efforts made by Ramsay MacDonald, which resulted in their transition from being a party of protest to a party of power. ?? ?? ?? ?? Why was Labour able to replace the Liberals as the major non-Conservative party in Britain, between 1914 and 1924? 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How significant was The First World War in the Labour Party's rise to second-party ...

    Furthermore at the 1924 election Macdonald manipulated the "Liberal-Conservative combination" as he called it, which "highlighted the inconsistency of the Liberals political stance."4 The Liberals failure to distance themselves from the Tory's at the 1924 election demonstrated not only that they were a party increasingly affiliated with the right, but

  2. How successful were the Labour governments of 1924 and of 1929-31?

    Moreover the Party's weakness on policy was exposed, as the Party only really had a long-run and vague commitment to socialism. The Party didn't have a majority and so the distinctive policies which the Party did have were effectively ignored.

  1. Did the Labour Party show that it could govern Britain competently in the years ...

    term in office, claiming that this indicates a degree of governmental incompetence. MacDonald was determined that the Labour Party would be representative of the nation as a whole, and not merely a political wing of the TUC. Therefore, MacDonald did not want to be seen as giving in to strikers or other industrial activists.

  2. "The first World War killed the Liberal Party" how far do you agree with ...

    This proved a competence on Asquith's behalf, and perhaps suggests that the First World War was not the only aspect that killed the Liberal Party, because they showed themselves to be able to handle some aspects of the war in very clever political manoeuvres, such as coalition.

  1. "The Rise of the Labour Party between 1893-1914 was due more to the growth ...

    by 1903, an annual income of approximately five thousand pounds, which increased their prestige and their chance to get a larger number of MPs into the House of Commons in the next election. Without the trade union's support, the Labour Party would not have these essential advantages.

  2. How far do Sources A-G support the view that Ramsay MacDonald deserves to be ...

    By having the group of men carrying the stop look and listen flags it shows that MacDonald was seen to be safe, and a trustworthy PM. Source D is a primary source from a Labour politician it would seem to be very much in favour of the idea that MacDonald

  1. How far was the First World War responsible for the growth of the Labour ...

    Therefore the corporate aim of the Labour Party of catering for the needs of workers had united all members with diverse beliefs concerning the war and so prevented a split in the Labour Party, which allowed it to make headway to growth throughout the First World War.

  2. To what extent has the Labour party completely abandoned its' traditional Principles?

    the principal of public investment to improve the lives of the entire nation. Under the traditional labour party values, public spending and the welfare state were seen as important means in order to cater for every person of the British public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work