• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Chartism a failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was Chartism a failure? The Chartist movement aimed to change the existing post 1832 political settlement to create a fairer, more representative system of franchise for the lower classes. Although Chartism had mass support (it gained 3 million signatures in the second petition of 1842) it failed to achieve its aims. There are many reasons for this, but primarily it was down to the strength of Peel's government. Yet it must be recognised that to dismiss Chartism as a total failure would be a complete injustice since it taught vital lessons to the working classes about how to organise themselves and also made them more aware of the abuse of their basic human rights. The attitudes of parliament contributed to the Chartists failing their objectives. Since the government had already been forced into change by popular pressure between 1830-32 (the Great Reform Act) they were not prepared to do so again. It is not surprising that the Chartist message failed, as there was such a large majority in parliament (which included the Church and the Army) ...read more.

Middle

Through his powerful platform speeches and the messages he gave in his Northern Star newspaper, he managed to convince a number of Chartists to follow his lead. The clashes between the key figures of Lovett and O'Connor prove the divisions and the exposed contradictions, which lead to the defeat of the Chartist movement. Regional differences strongly contributed to the downfall of the Chartist movement as it was not united enough to have the power to successfully influence the government. Chartism was strongest in the North and weakest in the South. It tended to act in isolation and therefore it was difficult to co-ordinate a national strategy to undermine the government. Chartism was interpreted in different ways in different places in the country. The North favoured physical force whilst Birmingham had close links to 'moral force' Chartism and the Anti-Corn Law league. Scotland also had its own views about Chartism and the message was spread through the idea of 'Christian Chartism'. ...read more.

Conclusion

A mid-Victorian boom lead to rising wages and increased food consumption. As the people were relaxed and happy they had more faith in the government and economy and therefore their support for the Chartists declined. In the short term these points would suggest that Chartism achieved very little. Yet is this a fair evaluation of such a complex movement? Perhaps it is fairer to say that in the long term Chartism did achieve a great deal as all but one of the six points in the Charter had been put into effect by 1918. The lessons learnt from the Chartist struggle were to be of vital importance when the question of the extension of franchise appeared again in 1867 and 1884. Rather than to dismiss the movement, E. Hopkins, in A Social History of the English Working Classes, 1815-1945 (1979) claims that the Chartist movement represented "the most striking and wide spread working class movement for political reform in the 19th century". Kayley Edwards ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    The Chartists thought that solutions to symptoms were not good enough. In order to get to the roots of the problem, the cause has to be dealt with. They argued that the cause of such deprivation was because the working classed had no political representation.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    had to be respected and tolerated by the King and Queen, together with their representatives, that in turn would receive tolerance from the Maltese authorities. There had to be no foreign interference in the Maltese spiritual and social affairs and any religious problems had to be solved by the Pope or by the head of any monastic order.

  1. Account for the failures of the Chartist movement in the 19th century.

    Extract from the Chartist petition drawn up in 1838: "We, your petitioners, dwell in a land whose merchants are noted for their enterprise, whose manufacturers are very skilful and whose workmen are proverbial for their industry....Yet we find ourselves overwhelmed with public and private suffering.

  2. The failure of Chartism was due to improved economical conditions rather than the movement's ...

    After the 1832 Reform Act radicals had always hoped for an extension of the vote as it was seen that the act itself was achieved through similar pressure on the government. However the Grey government throughout this period was not prepared to do this (again)

  1. What was Chartism and why did it fail

    As short-term unemployment was a living reality in their society it was disastrous act for many local communities. Unsatisfied, the working classes began to act independently through the sounding board of a number of radical groups inspired by Thomas Paine an author and revolutionary radical.

  2. To what extent can the failure of the Fascist Movement to challenge the existing ...

    'global fascism' but this funding could not be justified with the lack of progress the Fascists seemed to be making. One reason why the BUF failed to become a significant force is due to their tactics and use of excessive violence.

  1. Was the Provisional Government doomed to failure?

    They are at heart anti-war. In Moscow at any rate the Mensheviki represent today the majority and are more favourable to the war.' This tells us that the majority of the people were in support of the war, but there is evidence to tell us otherwise.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    To clear 65% of Social Fund Community Care grant applications in 7 days and 95% in 20 days. To clear 71% of Income Support Claims within 5 days and 90% within 13 days. To clear 65% of Sickness and Invalidity Benefit Claims within 10 days and 95% within 30 days.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work