• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Was the Aristocracy Widely Perceived to be in Crisis in 1880-1950?

Extracts from this document...


Charlotte Lavin. Dr. Ian Packer Why Was the Aristocracy Widely Perceived to be in Crisis in 1880-1950? For centuries the aristocracy had remained Britain's 'ruling elite', a few ruling families dominated the social, economical and political spheres. Yet by the 1880's, as the question suggests, this commanding grip looked to be under threat and thus bringing the aristocracy into crisis. A crisis is often defined as a turning point, a time of acute trouble or danger. Can this definition be rightly used to describe what occurred to the aristocracy post 1880? And what or/and who caused this 'crisis' if there was one? Perhaps the most obvious sign of the aristocracy in crisis was that from the late nineteenth century land had begun to lose its political influence and financial security. Since the advent of Feudalism the peerage and the land had been undeniably linked, but all this changed in those seventy years (1880-1950). Being part of the 'landocracy'1 was no longer enough in this time of changing opinions and conditions against the old ruling elite. Less landowners made it into the peerage, the post-1880 governments favouring merchants, lawyers, the nouveau rich. Also, there were less landowners in the House of Commons to promote into the House of Lords. ...read more.


The extent of the number of those forced to sell estates and vast acres of land indicated a clear trend in the dramatic decline of the landed ruling elite in just seventy years. The turn of the century also saw the introduction of the so-called 'super tax'6; a twenty percent duty on land values when estates changed hands. The liberal need to assert the difference between an earned income and those on an unearned income had again made the aristocracy crisis, and highlighted the changing attitudes towards the aristocracy. Status, had for a long time been the mainstay of the old aristocracy, it was the way they conducted most of their business from marriages to political allegiances, but this too had come under threat from the 1880's. The decline in the importance of land had played a major role in creating a social crisis for the old elite. The advent of the noveau riche, created by the industrial revolution and included such as newspaper and railway magnates. They threatened to dilute the social exclusiveness of the aristocracy by 'buying' peerages from the government by making heavy donations to the party in power. This and the lure of big money and intermarriage made it impossible for the aristocracy to rule or defend as a class. ...read more.


There were no aristocratic Prime Ministers from 1905 with the resignation of Balfour, to 1940 with the election of Churchill, and even he was half American11. By this time and after the role of the aristocracy in the Cabinet was more a fa´┐Żade than a genuine attempt to continue in power. Politics had become more professional than just a family obligation within the seventy years. Many aristocracy could no longer afford to dabble in politics and with rising hostility against them they, like Napoleon from Moscow, made a final tactical withdrawal form government politics altogether. Thee aristocracy was 'widely perceived' to be in crisis from the 1880's onwards because the power by which they dominated for centuries spiralled into decline without them being able to prevent it. Key factors like the rise of Liberalism (inspiring a change in attitudes) and the growth of capitalism (and thus new areas of wealth) meant that the archaic principles of Feudalism, which had protected the aristocracy for so long, were no longer viable. The term 'crisis' is justified in this instance, due to the pace at which the aristocracy declined politically, economically and socially, a mere seventy years. It was a disaster for the old ruling elite, from which they are unlikely ever to recover. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    A significant component of managing perceptions is the extent to which government is open to discussion with possible investors. Research has shown that companies who talk to government are more inclined to investment than others. (J Cargill and K. Heese 2002)

  2. Why Did Revolutions Break Out so Widely Across Europe in 1848 and Why Did ...

    Peasant unrest caused by long-standing poor conditions led to calls for independence in Sicily, and constitutions in the other states of Italy to protect the lower classes. In a similar fashion, the urban workers who were aggravated by poverty and unemployment took to the streets, while middle-class intellectuals strove for republican government in Paris, and national-liberal concessions all over Europe.

  1. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    Only 42% of all Singaporeans favor the idea of a national culture and 61% of Singaporeans consider it important that people know what ethnic group they belong to. This does not mean Singaporeans also reject a multi-ethnic society, quite on the opposite.

  2. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    During the First World War, however, the coal industry was taken into the control of the government. At this time wages were good, and the workers were happy. At the conclusion of the war, however, the mines were handed back to their owners, and it was at this point that

  1. How and why did Federation occur?

    The main view of Aboriginal people at this time was that they were a "dying race". In 1901, 77% of the population were Australian born, and 23% born overseas. Of those born overseas, the overwhelming majority (79%) was British born.

  2. British Politics.

    Lord Halisham once described this as an 'elective dictatorship'. During the 1980's there were many constitutional changes, which may not have occurred had the UK had a written constitution, for example the abolition of the GLC. Another example of this would be the reform by New Labour of Parliamentary Question time.

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Since the Maltese deficit was high, when the knights were sent-off the French raised the taxes and besides they also turned to the church things and sold them on auction. Some of these precious things were taken on Napoleon's ship.

  2. What considerations influenced the British government's response to the crisis in America?

    Ian Christie sees the colonial war with France as a good starting point in the gradual build up of the colonial conflict. Colonial assistance had depended on goodwill to an extent, and this had worked well on the whole, but the uneven response and political ambitions of the different colonists was perhaps an early indication of political awareness in America.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work