• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Was the Aristocracy Widely Perceived to be in Crisis in 1880-1950?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Charlotte Lavin. Dr. Ian Packer Why Was the Aristocracy Widely Perceived to be in Crisis in 1880-1950? For centuries the aristocracy had remained Britain's 'ruling elite', a few ruling families dominated the social, economical and political spheres. Yet by the 1880's, as the question suggests, this commanding grip looked to be under threat and thus bringing the aristocracy into crisis. A crisis is often defined as a turning point, a time of acute trouble or danger. Can this definition be rightly used to describe what occurred to the aristocracy post 1880? And what or/and who caused this 'crisis' if there was one? Perhaps the most obvious sign of the aristocracy in crisis was that from the late nineteenth century land had begun to lose its political influence and financial security. Since the advent of Feudalism the peerage and the land had been undeniably linked, but all this changed in those seventy years (1880-1950). Being part of the 'landocracy'1 was no longer enough in this time of changing opinions and conditions against the old ruling elite. Less landowners made it into the peerage, the post-1880 governments favouring merchants, lawyers, the nouveau rich. Also, there were less landowners in the House of Commons to promote into the House of Lords. ...read more.

Middle

The extent of the number of those forced to sell estates and vast acres of land indicated a clear trend in the dramatic decline of the landed ruling elite in just seventy years. The turn of the century also saw the introduction of the so-called 'super tax'6; a twenty percent duty on land values when estates changed hands. The liberal need to assert the difference between an earned income and those on an unearned income had again made the aristocracy crisis, and highlighted the changing attitudes towards the aristocracy. Status, had for a long time been the mainstay of the old aristocracy, it was the way they conducted most of their business from marriages to political allegiances, but this too had come under threat from the 1880's. The decline in the importance of land had played a major role in creating a social crisis for the old elite. The advent of the noveau riche, created by the industrial revolution and included such as newspaper and railway magnates. They threatened to dilute the social exclusiveness of the aristocracy by 'buying' peerages from the government by making heavy donations to the party in power. This and the lure of big money and intermarriage made it impossible for the aristocracy to rule or defend as a class. ...read more.

Conclusion

There were no aristocratic Prime Ministers from 1905 with the resignation of Balfour, to 1940 with the election of Churchill, and even he was half American11. By this time and after the role of the aristocracy in the Cabinet was more a fa´┐Żade than a genuine attempt to continue in power. Politics had become more professional than just a family obligation within the seventy years. Many aristocracy could no longer afford to dabble in politics and with rising hostility against them they, like Napoleon from Moscow, made a final tactical withdrawal form government politics altogether. Thee aristocracy was 'widely perceived' to be in crisis from the 1880's onwards because the power by which they dominated for centuries spiralled into decline without them being able to prevent it. Key factors like the rise of Liberalism (inspiring a change in attitudes) and the growth of capitalism (and thus new areas of wealth) meant that the archaic principles of Feudalism, which had protected the aristocracy for so long, were no longer viable. The term 'crisis' is justified in this instance, due to the pace at which the aristocracy declined politically, economically and socially, a mere seventy years. It was a disaster for the old ruling elite, from which they are unlikely ever to recover. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    The other option was the 1% of tax on all imports. All the people would suffer, and hence they could have affected the economy of Malta, if they rebelled against the British. Finally although trade had increased there were things that angered the Maltese, like the fact that trading with the British colonies was prohibited.

  2. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    In 1935 MacDonald gave way to Baldwin again as Prime Minister, and Neville Chamberlain took over in 1937 after the latter retired. In 1939, Britain was plunged into yet another World War, fighting for its life against a smart and powerful foe intent on its destruction.

  1. The Rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    Suleyman the Just: In most Islamic History, Suleyman is regarded as the perfect ruler. He had all the necessary characteristics one of the most important of which was justice. Suleyman was named after Solomon, and definitely lived up to his name.

  2. What is Politics

    Traditional authority includes the monarch, the Pope and a parent. Their authority is customary, well established and comes from experience as much as their position. Legal authority. Legal authority encompasses those who gain their authority from their office, for example, the prime minister and the US president.

  1. The Advent of Imperialism

    Thus, imperialism and reactions to it spread Western civilization to non-Western lands. The great test of Western Imperialism is Asia, where vast peoples live, the inheritors of civilisations as complex as our own, more ancient and more firmly rooted by enduring custom in the general life.

  2. Prospects for India's development

    in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Bihar seem to lack proper skills and training. Contrary to the former, the latter cannot rely on relocation as a means to escape from unemployment and will probably have to depend upon government initiative (through education and training)

  1. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    According to The group CEO, Mr. Mkwanazi, Transnet would spend R15bn over the next 15 years on additional Spoornet locomotives to increase its annual capacity from 185 million tons to 240 million tons. (Star, Business Report, 23 July 2003). Spoornet has predicted that volumes transported by rail on the Maputo line will be tripled over the next 15 years.

  2. Asian Values in Singaporean Perspective.

    At this point these different cultures have found a common ground and the discussion over "Asian values" started (Rodan, 1996). Thus if we see "Asian values" as the conservative or traditional viewpoint of the societies in Asia we can avoid the divisiveness of the argument.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work