• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there popular discontent between 1815-1822? How was it expressed and did the government deal with it successfully?

Extracts from this document...


Britain has always been a traditional society. It is one of the reasons so many tourists flock here each year, observing such visual delights such as the changing of the guard or the waving hand of the queen. However, despite our apparent fondness for continuity and stability, at times these values are tested to their very limits. One such period was the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars, namely 1815 - 1822. In this essay, I will demonstrate how the ruling oligarchy was forced to leap from crisis to crisis, desperately trying to quell the increasing tide of civil discontent around Britain. I also hope to explain the reasons behind the protests. The major event of 1815 was the battle of Waterloo, and the subsequent British victory over the French. The end of the war came, however as a mixed blessing for the government. On the one hand, Britain had defeated one of its biggest threats (Napoleon,) and secured its trade routes across Europe, both on and off shore. However, the flip side of the coin held many nasty surprises. Firstly, the 400,000 returning soldiers put an intolerable strain on the labour market. Considering the population at the time was less than 10 million, this extra influx of labour had a major impact on the economy. ...read more.


Many people felt that the government existed solely to appease the wealthily ruling class and nobody else. They therefore felt that it was time for a change; the administration should work to improve the lives of the vulnerable in society rather that protect the interests of a small few. This was spurred on by the conditions that the working class had to endure while working in the new industries created by the industrial revolution. So, faced with the policies of Lord Liverpool's government, many people felt they were being treated unjustly. Some began to organise 'radical' groups to protest and press for change. Their essential demands were: - A parliament that gave a more accurate reflection of British society, thus giving everybody a voice. - Annual elections, making the administration more accountable. - A secret ballot, allowing people to vote without intimidation or any corruption. The radical movement sprang up all over Britain, and despite being fragmented and uncoordinated, conducted itself with surprising passion and managed to wake the government up to the fact that the people were not happy. Some examples of the way the radical movement expressed its discontent with the situation are the Luddite movement, the spa field riots, the march of the blanketeers and the pentrich rising. The Luddite movement were opposed to the increased mechanisation of the textile industry, and the inevitable job losses and (in most cases) ...read more.


The state of the Radical movement can be compared to the factions of the communist party in Russia around the time of the revolution. Two competing factions - one favouring non-violent transition, the other looking for a violent, bloody revolution were bitterly divided. The same problem existed in Britain 100 years earlier, and created a split that made it very hard to come together to win. The lack of weaponry also hindered the radicals, making them unable to intimidate the government forces sent in to break them up. It has also been suggested that the radical groups were too centred on their own local agenda's and not the hardened revolutionaries they are sometimes portrayed as. This would have seriously weakened their ability to significantly change British society. Therefore, to conclude, The post-war period in 17th Century Britain was a time of great public discontent, caused by the economic downturn (a consequence of the ending of the war economy,) rising unemployment, taxation and a General feeling that the government was out of touch with ordinary people, putting their concerns behind those of the ruling classes. The government tried to deal with the situation by coming down very hard on the reformers, but the failure of the revolutionaries was more to do with a lack of unity among the movment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    All of these incidences were seen as a starting point for a revolution. We are now going to look at what the government did in response to these actions. It is commonly alleged that Liverpool's government pursued repressive policies between 1815 and 1820.

  2. How effective was the response of Lord Liverpool's government to the domestic problems they ...

    and the dormant power held by the working classes over their greedy upper class masters, should they but unite and take it. These speakers were at the forefront of the battle for educating workers, because then they could spread their ideals better with pamphlets and posters, instead of having to

  1. How Far Was Lord Liverpool's Government Directly Responsible for the popular unrest in the ...

    This came combined with a run of bad harvests, causing grain supply to dwindle which massively increasing prices as no foreign grain could be imported. In fact, the situation became so bad that the government felt the need to introduce the Speenhamland system, providing all poor people with enough money to meet this inflated price for bread.

  2. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    In reality, their wealth and the subsequent power provided no protection against this 'angry mob.' The French Revolution demonstrated to the world that real political power comes from the everyday citizens. War was to be a catalyst for change, but inevitably, it also brought about many miseries.

  1. The Mexican Economy

    She was 25 years old when she joined the Zapatista Army and saw almost the whole process of how it moved forward. She was one of the first women who was part of the ranks of the Army and has risen to hold the highest rank of any woman in the EZLN.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    One must forget the Italian exiles that although through the Law of Extradition were exiled from our country, some of them could have remained on our islands while the others that flee from Malta left a great impact upon the Maltese citizens, especially amongst the middle class and the educated people.

  1. The 'Liberal Tories'. To what extent do you agree with this description of the ...

    In 1822, Canning replaced Castlereagh as foreign secretary; and Peel replaced Sidmouth as Home secretary. In 1823, Robinson replaced Vansittart as Chancellor of the Exchequer; and Huskisson became the president of the board of trade. But although these men were new to their senior positions within the party, they were

  2. Opposition to the New Deal

    Act and the Wealth Tax (Revenue Act of 1935). * As far as the second is concerned, it was the American Socialist Movement. Growing by the mid-1930s, it was never more than 10,000 strong, mostly among journalists, writers and labor leaders.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work