• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there popular discontent between 1815-1822? How was it expressed and did the government deal with it successfully?

Extracts from this document...


Britain has always been a traditional society. It is one of the reasons so many tourists flock here each year, observing such visual delights such as the changing of the guard or the waving hand of the queen. However, despite our apparent fondness for continuity and stability, at times these values are tested to their very limits. One such period was the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars, namely 1815 - 1822. In this essay, I will demonstrate how the ruling oligarchy was forced to leap from crisis to crisis, desperately trying to quell the increasing tide of civil discontent around Britain. I also hope to explain the reasons behind the protests. The major event of 1815 was the battle of Waterloo, and the subsequent British victory over the French. The end of the war came, however as a mixed blessing for the government. On the one hand, Britain had defeated one of its biggest threats (Napoleon,) and secured its trade routes across Europe, both on and off shore. However, the flip side of the coin held many nasty surprises. Firstly, the 400,000 returning soldiers put an intolerable strain on the labour market. Considering the population at the time was less than 10 million, this extra influx of labour had a major impact on the economy. ...read more.


Many people felt that the government existed solely to appease the wealthily ruling class and nobody else. They therefore felt that it was time for a change; the administration should work to improve the lives of the vulnerable in society rather that protect the interests of a small few. This was spurred on by the conditions that the working class had to endure while working in the new industries created by the industrial revolution. So, faced with the policies of Lord Liverpool's government, many people felt they were being treated unjustly. Some began to organise 'radical' groups to protest and press for change. Their essential demands were: - A parliament that gave a more accurate reflection of British society, thus giving everybody a voice. - Annual elections, making the administration more accountable. - A secret ballot, allowing people to vote without intimidation or any corruption. The radical movement sprang up all over Britain, and despite being fragmented and uncoordinated, conducted itself with surprising passion and managed to wake the government up to the fact that the people were not happy. Some examples of the way the radical movement expressed its discontent with the situation are the Luddite movement, the spa field riots, the march of the blanketeers and the pentrich rising. The Luddite movement were opposed to the increased mechanisation of the textile industry, and the inevitable job losses and (in most cases) ...read more.


The state of the Radical movement can be compared to the factions of the communist party in Russia around the time of the revolution. Two competing factions - one favouring non-violent transition, the other looking for a violent, bloody revolution were bitterly divided. The same problem existed in Britain 100 years earlier, and created a split that made it very hard to come together to win. The lack of weaponry also hindered the radicals, making them unable to intimidate the government forces sent in to break them up. It has also been suggested that the radical groups were too centred on their own local agenda's and not the hardened revolutionaries they are sometimes portrayed as. This would have seriously weakened their ability to significantly change British society. Therefore, to conclude, The post-war period in 17th Century Britain was a time of great public discontent, caused by the economic downturn (a consequence of the ending of the war economy,) rising unemployment, taxation and a General feeling that the government was out of touch with ordinary people, putting their concerns behind those of the ruling classes. The government tried to deal with the situation by coming down very hard on the reformers, but the failure of the revolutionaries was more to do with a lack of unity among the movment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Word 'Hacker' To the popular press, "hacker" means someone who breaks into ...

    And they are right. It is by poking about inside current technology that hackers get ideas for the next generation. No thanks, intellectual homeowners may say, we don't need any outside help.

  2. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    All of these incidences were seen as a starting point for a revolution. We are now going to look at what the government did in response to these actions. It is commonly alleged that Liverpool's government pursued repressive policies between 1815 and 1820.

  1. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    The king disagreed preventing him from carrying out his proposals. Pitt found himself redundant, and a new Government was formed. Pitt supported the new ministry and was invited by the new Prime Minister to join the Government in 1803. Pitt refused the offer, as he would return only as Prime Minister.

  2. How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the ...

    Although the British radical movement remained constitutional, and merely underlyingly threatened violence through the force of numbers, many radicals saw the French Revolution as a sign of the need for political change, even if they were not prepared to advocate extreme bloodshed and violence of revolution in Britain.

  1. The 'Liberal Tories'. To what extent do you agree with this description of the ...

    The penal code (the judicial system) was in desperate need of reform, over 200 offences carried the death penalty, even for just stealing a piece of bread. Research has shown that some of these `criminals' that had been put to death were in fact innocent.

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    the following articles: Article 1 The two Contracting Parties mutually agree that when the opportune moment arrives the Han-Yeh-Ping Company shall be made a joint concern of the two nations, and that, without the consent of the Japanese Government, the Chinese Government shall not dispose or permit the Company to dispose of any right or property of the Company.

  1. To what extent was the weakness of the radicals the cause of Pitt surviving ...

    Burke 'got it right', but died in 1797 and never saw the rise of Napoleon. Even though Burke was against the revolution it is not to say that he opposed reform, He believed in organic reform and organic growth: that is, natural evolution. He had no time for drastic revolution.

  2. How close did Britain come to revolution between 1815 and 1821?

    They were unemployed because of industrialisation and could barely afford bread because of the corn laws and other goods because of the repeal of income tax, they wanted jobs and money not a new government. 'There is no evidence whatever of any political motives on the part of the Luddites' Samuel Whittbread.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work