• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there popular discontent between 1815-1822? How was it expressed and did the government deal with it successfully?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain has always been a traditional society. It is one of the reasons so many tourists flock here each year, observing such visual delights such as the changing of the guard or the waving hand of the queen. However, despite our apparent fondness for continuity and stability, at times these values are tested to their very limits. One such period was the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars, namely 1815 - 1822. In this essay, I will demonstrate how the ruling oligarchy was forced to leap from crisis to crisis, desperately trying to quell the increasing tide of civil discontent around Britain. I also hope to explain the reasons behind the protests. The major event of 1815 was the battle of Waterloo, and the subsequent British victory over the French. The end of the war came, however as a mixed blessing for the government. On the one hand, Britain had defeated one of its biggest threats (Napoleon,) and secured its trade routes across Europe, both on and off shore. However, the flip side of the coin held many nasty surprises. Firstly, the 400,000 returning soldiers put an intolerable strain on the labour market. Considering the population at the time was less than 10 million, this extra influx of labour had a major impact on the economy. ...read more.

Middle

Many people felt that the government existed solely to appease the wealthily ruling class and nobody else. They therefore felt that it was time for a change; the administration should work to improve the lives of the vulnerable in society rather that protect the interests of a small few. This was spurred on by the conditions that the working class had to endure while working in the new industries created by the industrial revolution. So, faced with the policies of Lord Liverpool's government, many people felt they were being treated unjustly. Some began to organise 'radical' groups to protest and press for change. Their essential demands were: - A parliament that gave a more accurate reflection of British society, thus giving everybody a voice. - Annual elections, making the administration more accountable. - A secret ballot, allowing people to vote without intimidation or any corruption. The radical movement sprang up all over Britain, and despite being fragmented and uncoordinated, conducted itself with surprising passion and managed to wake the government up to the fact that the people were not happy. Some examples of the way the radical movement expressed its discontent with the situation are the Luddite movement, the spa field riots, the march of the blanketeers and the pentrich rising. The Luddite movement were opposed to the increased mechanisation of the textile industry, and the inevitable job losses and (in most cases) ...read more.

Conclusion

The state of the Radical movement can be compared to the factions of the communist party in Russia around the time of the revolution. Two competing factions - one favouring non-violent transition, the other looking for a violent, bloody revolution were bitterly divided. The same problem existed in Britain 100 years earlier, and created a split that made it very hard to come together to win. The lack of weaponry also hindered the radicals, making them unable to intimidate the government forces sent in to break them up. It has also been suggested that the radical groups were too centred on their own local agenda's and not the hardened revolutionaries they are sometimes portrayed as. This would have seriously weakened their ability to significantly change British society. Therefore, to conclude, The post-war period in 17th Century Britain was a time of great public discontent, caused by the economic downturn (a consequence of the ending of the war economy,) rising unemployment, taxation and a General feeling that the government was out of touch with ordinary people, putting their concerns behind those of the ruling classes. The government tried to deal with the situation by coming down very hard on the reformers, but the failure of the revolutionaries was more to do with a lack of unity among the movment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    Much disorder was actually provoked by the government - either indirectly through policies which placed intolerable burdens upon the poor or directly through the practice of employing agent's provocateurs who encouraged lawbreaking so that they could collect a reward by informing on the law breakers.

  2. How close did Britain come to revolution between 1815 and 1821?

    They were unemployed because of industrialisation and could barely afford bread because of the corn laws and other goods because of the repeal of income tax, they wanted jobs and money not a new government. 'There is no evidence whatever of any political motives on the part of the Luddites' Samuel Whittbread.

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    One of them was that the Maltese at Algiers had to be loyal to the French administrations. The French government granted his dominance over the whole country, and the Maltese being under the British influence could have disagreed with certain French perspectives.

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    schools and hospitals, the supply of arms and ammunition and the establishment of arsenals and railway concessions in South China in the revised proposals, they were either proposed with the proviso that the consent of the Power concerned must be obtained, or they are merely to be recorded in the

  1. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    These members took the opportunity to join Pitt. Pitt's success was down to the influence of the Crown. Patronage and corruption gave him the majority vote. "Although public opinion aided Pitt in the open constituencies, it is never the less misleading to say that he was the choice of the

  2. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    first Marxist group was formed by Plekhanov, the Father of Russian Marxism, as late as 1883. In 1898, Lenin formed another Marxist party, known as the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. In August 1903, the Social Democratic Party held a party congress in London.

  1. 'Repressive and Unpopular'. Is this a fair assessment of Lord Liverpool's government?

    Peters Field to arrest the main speaker Henry Hunt despite the fact that Sidmouth, the Home Secretary, had advised that it would be wisest not to intervene unless the mob rioted or committed acts of felony. Thus the 'massacre' resulted from the misjudgement of men on the spot acting in a manner directly contrary to Home Office advice.

  2. The 'Liberal Tories'. To what extent do you agree with this description of the ...

    The penal code (the judicial system) was in desperate need of reform, over 200 offences carried the death penalty, even for just stealing a piece of bread. Research has shown that some of these `criminals' that had been put to death were in fact innocent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work