• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there repression by Lord Liverpool's government 1815-1820? Was Britain on the verge of a revolution?

Extracts from this document...


Why was there repression by Lord Liverpool's government 1815-1820? Was Britain on the verge of a revolution? During this period of time, there are four types of people involved, the middling class perhaps wanting reform, the working class leaders wanting the vote, the working class (the mass) just wanted food and jobs and then there were the real revolutionaries (a real minority). Lord Liverpool's government believed that the revolutionaries were a majority. First to answer this question we need to understand what repression means. Repression is the act to suppress a thought, feeling or desire in someone so that it becomes unconscious. There were many forms of repression taken by Lord Liverpool's government between 1815-1820. They were: the abolition of income tax for the rich, the corn laws, suspension of habeas corpus, six acts, use of agents provocateurs and the seditious act. ...read more.


The laws acted as a protection against the bankruptcy of the landowners. The suspension of habeas corpus for six months meant that a person could now be arrested without being formally charged with an offence. This meant that the government could arrest anyone they thought would start trouble. The Seditious Meeting Act meant that gatherings of more than 50 were prohibited. The six acts were: restrictions on public meetings called to draft petitions, magistrates empowered to confiscate seditious literature, magistrates empowered to confiscate arms, increased stamp tax on newspapers and pamphlets, increased powers for the prosecution in treason cases, and training for private armies prohibited. The use of 'agents provocateurs' meant that any revolutionary groups could be infiltrated and suppressed. They also deliberately caused trouble so that troublemakers could be exposed. Due to the repression made by Lord Liverpool's government the publics reaction was not surprising. ...read more.


They were followers of Thomas Spence. A meeting between them in London's Spa Fields got out of hand and led to riots and looting. The Cato Street conspirators devised a plan to assassinate al the members of Lord Liverpool's government as they had caused all this repression and unfair acts. They were found out due to 'agents provocateurs' infiltrating them and exposing them. They were all executed. All this repression made by Lord Liverpool's government was all due to them believing that Britain was on the verge f a revolution. The French Revolution began in1789, by aristocrats who wanted a constitutional monarchy. However in 1793/94 the Jacobins, political extremists started a reign of Terror. Lord Liverpool's government took it as a warning of what might happen if things changed in Britain. Was Britain on the verge of a revolution? No, although people did see dangers of a revolution the vast majority of the public simply wanted food and jobs, they did not care for politics and the right to vote. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    They felt they had to do whatever necessary to stop revolution. The historians that say the country was close to a revolution in the period 1815-1822 tend to emphasise the sheer volume of radical activity during this period.

  2. How close did Britain come to revolution between 1815 and 1821?

    In 1816 the Spa Field Riots took place. The group of people behind the incident were the Spenceans, I would consider them revolutionary. Arthur Thistlewood, the leader of the Spenceans wanted to overthrow the government he organised three meetings in London at which Henry Hunt was the speaker.

  1. How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the ...

    political organisations and demand a more open debate on the existing political and social system, which deprived them of their rights. Major Cartwright's, (a prominent figure in the radical movement), introduction of well over a hundred debating societies known as Hampden Clubs increased political awareness and they presented their grievances

  2. Summary of the Causes of the 1905 Revolution.

    The regime, especially the Ministry of the Interior, followed a very paternalist path in the interests of preserving the traditional social hierarchy; there was no attempt made to abolish communal tenure, in spite of arguments from the Ministry of Finance, because Tolstoy at the Ministry of the Interior felt it was a major agent for social peace.

  1. After the March revolution and the Tsar's resignation, why did the Provisional Government last ...

    Food and equipment were confiscated for the army and as a result the prices went up, living conditions were made no better. The workers in the cities were forced to work overtime for less money, and yet conditions for the soldiers were just as bad.

  2. Why did Britain have no '1848 revolution'?

    Third, the difference in the position of the middle class affected the ability and success of political movements since it was only when economic discontent gained a political focus that it became a threat to existing governments. The aggravation of Middling classes were vital in this both in Britain and

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    The annual cost of running the Civil Service is �20 billion and it was decided that all government departments would be required to have their functions 'market tested' to discover if they could be carded out more cheaply and efficiently either within the public sector or by private firms.

  2. How Far Was Lord Liverpool's Government Directly Responsible for the popular unrest in the ...

    Time and time again the government reacted badly to the situation, further exacerbating it. In this respect, the Government was directly responsible for the civil disturbance, but they were not totally at fault. Liverpool's Introduction of the Corn Laws after the war left the lower classes starving while the rich landowners made huge profits.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work