• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were Labour able to gain power but not keep it between 1918 and 1939?

Extracts from this document...


Why were Labour able to gain power but not keep it between 1918 and 1939? In 1918 as World War One reached its climax the prime minister, David Lloyd George, led his Liberals into an easy election victory. The coalition government had worked well; he was popular amongst the newly enfranchised working class due to his background and as such rushed through a 'khaki' election. However another party benefited from this khaki election: the Labour party. The war years had been beneficial to them, it had given them their first real opportunity to fully practice in a government. Unfortunately they were not yet of sufficient stature or support to themselves run the government. After the war had ended, Lloyd George had had many difficulties demobilising the British troops, as well as coping with the recession of the early twenties and the many social problems in Britain which had been neglected during war. Labour's opportunity to seize power came about between 1918 and 1922. ...read more.


This is a reasonable explanation as to why the Labour party experienced a surge in votes. Therefore it is easy to see the circumstances in which the party managed to achieve success, yet why they failed to hold on to it is more contentious. The period of 1929 to 1931 was possibly one of the most difficult politically, with the exception of wartime, in twentieth century politics. Ramsay MacDonald promised to sort out the Coalmines Act, a Housing Act, unemployment issues and also foreign policy, which was extremely popular with the working classes. Baldwin held office for most of the nineteen twenties, with the exception of the Labour party's short periods. Baldwin found himself out of office almost as a rebellious act by the British people, who, when dissatisfied with an event or policy's handling dared to vote out in protest. The General Strike of 1926 had caused much discontent amongst the British people; the economic crises of the early and late twenties much worry. ...read more.


The coalition however was strong. Ramsay MacDonald continued as Prime Minister to 1935, and the National Government which succeeded was only interrupted by war in 1939. In conclusion Labour was able to gain power through appearing to be revolutionary: they were the answer to many working class people's prayers, but they fell down through their distaste for strong left wing, socialist action. This disappointed their heartlands and didn't win over enough of the middle ground voters, who had probably voted Liberal before. The pull of Asquith and Lloyd George and their mild resurgence meant that Labour lost votes where they should have pulled out all the stops, such as in 1929 when they roundly trounced the Conservatives 'safety first' policy through imagination and creative policies. They soon went the way of the main parties in forgetting their traditional voters in an attempt to woo new ones, and lost character MPs such as Mosley who were the future of the party from the ageing MacDonald, Henderson and Snowden. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How significant was The First World War in the Labour Party's rise to second-party ...

    Moore talks about the contribution of the Conservative Party adding to the rise of Labour, and he states that, the Conservative input in Labours rise was "highly significant"23. Indeed Moore talks about Maurice Cowlings claim, "the Conservative leadership took a conscious decision 'to make Labour the chief party of opposition.'

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    France knowing that migration was at its climax wanted Malta, as she knew its significance in the Mediterranean. On the other hand, because of the Italian Unification, Italy could have claims on Malta; in fact the upper classes were pro-Italian.

  1. Free essay

    Why keep the Cons. in the 1960s

    The health of the economy was claimed to be the work of Butler, who served as Chancellor of the Exchequer between 1951 and 1955.

  2. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    However, soon the economy started to go into a decline again, a decline that would not stop until the rearmament before World War II. The huge numbers of soldiers returning from the War caused a great level of unemployment among the populace, increasing social and civil unrest, driving down wages, and pushing up prices.

  1. Was the most important reason for the collapse of the coalition government in 1922 ...

    George, the whole party were involved also the party was only formed during the war and was intended only for the duration of the war it was not designed to be a peacetime government. As it did not have any policies or agendas for this type of government so it

  2. Do you agree that labour was "betrayed" by Ramsay MacDonald in 1931?

    The labour government had two aims which were to tackle unemployment and international friction. The labour government tackled these two aims one by one. The foreign affairs were restored when Ramsay MacDonald "visited Washington at the end of 1929 and held a naval conference in London the following year, here

  1. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    These Conservative measures meant that they were able to win their battle with the unions signaling the end of union domination in the governing of Britain. The ending of union power starting to bring about prominent signs of economic efficiency, from 1973-9 general economic productivity amounted to 1% or there about.

  2. Was the 2nd Labour Government betrayed by Ramsey McDonald in 1931?

    so much on his mind, he blundered this, not deliberately betrayed the party. McDonald was forced into the resignation of the Labour party by the economic situation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work