• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WHY WERE THE BOLSHEVIKS ABLETO TAKE AND HOLD POWERIN RUSSIA?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHY WERE THE BOLSHEVIKS ABLE TO TAKE AND HOLD POWER IN RUSSIA? The February Revolution of 1917 had essentially resulted in the collapse of the Tsardom. For centuries autocratic and repressive tsarist regimes ruled the country and a majority of the population lived under strenuous economic and social conditions. Russia's unsuccessful involvement in the First World War resulted in growing discontent amongst the Russian population, and eventually the fall of the Tsarist government. The Provisional government had replaced the Tsar but proved to be no more capable of successfully leading Russia than he had. The October revolution was a seizure of power by the Bolshevik party, arguably, not through their own strengths but due to the weaknesses of the opposition and the inefficiencies of the interim government. ...read more.

Middle

The result of these actions was severe inflation, and the prices of food and fuel almost quadrupled. To the problem of inflation and growing prices were the added difficulties of food production. Due to the full-scale mobilisation during the war of men from the countryside, it became difficult to maintain agricultural supplies. During the first two years of war, grain supplies were at a steady level. It was not until 1916 that peasants ceased to market produce and began to hoard supplies. Food shortages almost amounted to famine across Russia. This affected the army, who by 1916 in contrast to the high morale of 1914, became pessimistic and displayed defeatist attitudes and soon began to desert in increasing numbers. Overall the impression of an incompetent tsar emerged, and opposition to him rapidly came into existence from various political groups. ...read more.

Conclusion

There was a considerable amount of liaison between the two bodies, some individuals such as Alexander Kerensky were members of both. For a period he was Chairman of the Soviet as well as minister in the Provisional Government. From the very offset the Petrograd had the ability to restrict the Provisional Governments authority. And the 'Soviet order Number 1' in effect declared that the orders of the government with regard to military affairs were binding only if approved by the Petrograd Soviet. This drastically undermined the Government as any government which cannot directly control its army, cannot wield real power. After the fall of the Tsar there was an initial feeling of post revolutionary euphoria in Petrograd. However as the years wore on and the problems mounted, The provisional Government moved increasingly to the right and the Petrograd Soviet increasingly to the left, and soon the partnership of the Dual authority began to decay. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Critically evaluate/assess the achievements of Sergei Witte and their consequences for the social groups ...

    regime as it allowed them to directly control its growth economically in the way it wanted and without, it hoped, the social and political chaos or instability it feared.

  2. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    The Bolsheviks were able to seize the inability of the Provisional Government to organize an effective army, and used the current army as well as the Red Army to stir up a proletariat revolution that overthrew the government. The Bolsheviks exploited the Provisional Governments lack of action into creating an authoritative figure for themselves through the control of the army.

  1. It was the weakness of the provisional government that brought the October revolution about ...

    The situation rapidly worsened: "...robberies and housebreaking increased... week by week, food became scarcer...towards the end there was a week without bread at all." (John Reed, Ten Days that Shook the World). The Bolshevik party, with Lenin's pledge of "bread, peace and land" was one of the few realistic alternatives to the Provisional Government; the Bolsheviks took full advantage of the people's unrest and the Government's weaknesses.

  2. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    It was the Provisional Government's failure to cope with these difficulties that was to bring about its collapse. From the outset, the position of the Provisional Government was precarious.

  1. Why Summer Never Came to Russia.

    Soviets issued Order No 1, allowing the army to obey the Provisional Government insofar as the orders were in keeping with the Soviet. Therefore, the army would follow the commands of the Soviet and would not be used in any actions to counter those of the Revolution.

  2. Why were there two Revolutions in Russia in 1917? Why did the Bolsheviks ...

    The government was pushed to ruins within a few short months. Again the Tsar was being blamed for this, even though it was out of control. Many of the Russian public despised the Tsarina, due to the fact that she was German born.

  1. The Revolution of 1905 in Russia

    So the party should align itself with regular liberal parties to help destroy monarchy and build a democratic republic. The Bolsheviks insisted that they should set up a dictatorship of the proletariat immediately. There could therefore be no alliance with the bourgeoisie.

  2. How did governments in pre - revolutionary Russia deal with social and political unrest?

    When announcing his accession to the throne, he let it be very clearly understood that he had no intention of limiting or weakening the autocratic power that he had inherited from his ancestors. Nor did he afterwards show any inclination to change his mind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work