• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the Conservatives more successful than the Liberals in maintaining themselves in power from the middle of the 19th Century to the late 20th Century?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why were the Conservatives more successful than the Liberals in maintaining themselves in power from the middle of the 19th Century to the late 20th Century? The Conservatives managed to maintain a period of dominance from the middle of the 19th Century to the late 20th Century for many reasons. The electoral system favoured them, meaning that they did not even have to get more than 50% of the vote to win the election. They were very organised, and had strong leaders who knew how to appeal to a wide sector of the electorate, and could adapt to suit the needs of the country. This factor was helped by the weakness of the opposition - the Liberals and Labour, who had no one strong leader and were wracked by divisions. The electoral system in Britain favoured the Conservatives, helping them to dominate. The 'first-past-the-post' system, whereby whoever polls the highest number of votes in a constituency becomes its MP, meant that the Conservatives did not even need to win the majority of the votes cast. The 1918 Representation of the People Act preserved 'plural voting', allowing owners of business premises outside their constituency could vote twice, and graduates could also vote for University seats - both categories were likely to be Tory. ...read more.

Middle

Any defeats the Conservatives suffered were not crushing as a result, and they were able to recover. The weakness of the opposition was another important factor in the Conservatives maintaining support. The Liberals were divided on how to appeal to the electorate, with 4 possible methods; Gladstone's response, which failed to generate mass support and provoked irreconcilable differences over Home Rule for Ireland; Joseph Chamberlain and the Radical Alternative, whose radical policies made him enemies, and he also resigned over Home Rule; the Liberal Imperialists, who advocated Imperialism, which was discredited during the Boer War. Only New Liberalism had some success, winning the 1905 general election. The split between Asquith and Lloyd George in 1916 was something the Party never recovered from. When they put themselves forward as the party of economic radicalism in 1929, the results turned out to be very disappointing, their seats only growing to a total of 59. The Liberals also supported council-housing, but the Conservative desire for a property owning democracy was far more popular. People liked the idea of self-help. Labour was also very unlikely to overthrow the Conservatives; they were a new party, and its organisation was no where near as well-funded or efficient as the Conservatives'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Disraeli was another strong leader; from 1872, he realised he needed to appeal to a wider section of the electorate. He advocated imperialism, as it appealed to everyone. He also passed social reforms in the 1870s, appealing to all classes, showing that he could adapt to changing circumstances. Although the Conservatives were the dominating party during the middle of the 19th Century to the late 20th Century, it could be argued that to some extent they did not completely maintain power. The Liberals defeated them in 1905, by convincing the public that Conservatives meant high prices. The people also wanted domestic reform, which the Conservatives apparently could not deliver. Doubts also began to rise that empire was not the way forward, after the Boer War. By 1900, the twenty years of Conservative domination had begun to crumble. To conclude, the Conservatives were the dominating Party because the electoral system favoured them, allowing them to keep the majority of seats. An important reason was the weakness of the opposition, which meant that no party could be any real rival to them. Their strong leadership and party organisation were also very important factors, helping to compound the support of a wide sector of society. The unity within the party was also important, but perhaps to a lesser extent. Yasmin Sarioglu 13V ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    One of these was released soon after, whilst a second was discharged on compassionate grounds and a third died in custody. The remaining 34 had all been released by the time Habeas Corpus was fully restored in January 1818. As Norman Gash said 'It was not exactly a reign of terror'.

  2. Free essay

    Have modern Liberals abandoned individualism and embraced collectivism?

    The result of this understanding of moral philosophy is that each individual, each human being, is supremely important. Each individual should regard his or her own success in life as of supreme importance. The above concept of Individualism fits in perfectly with Classical Liberalism.

  1. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    Britain's economic decline in the 1960s was largely responsible for the demise of any existing consensus. Kenynesianism failed to rectify the 'stagflation', unemployment Increased, an aging population put pressure on the Welfare System, and union demands for wage increases and industrial unrest added to the Government's problems.

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    The new leader, Henderson was both a member of the Asquith coalition and the George War Cabinet, but he too resigned in 1917 in protest over what he saw as George's dictatorial methods. Career of Asquith Herbert Henry Asquith was the son of a Yorkshire clothing manufacturer.

  1. Poverty in early 20th century Britain

    The politicians who had previously felt the poor were lazy and pathetic now felt it was a moral responsibility to help them out of poverty. The British government's economy was growing very slowly at the end of the 1800's and early 1900's.

  2. "The Colonisation of Africa was Inevitable in the Late Nineteenth Century" Discuss.

    Lucrative opportunities were sought after by large firms (largely present in Germany), which had the financial capacity to invest heavily into colonies. These firms, through pro-colonial unions, applied pressure onto the reluctant Bismarck to acquire colonies in Africa (the only place left to do this), in order to enable these

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    The parties in government should therefore craft policies based on a consensus among the coalition partners. Moreover the composition of parliament should reflect the main divisions in the social composition of the electorate, so that all citizens have voices articulating their interests in the legislature.

  2. Did Gladstone Unite or Divide the Liberals?

    Gladstone became Prime Minister in December 1868, his first cabinet reflected the diverse composition of the Liberal Party. It contained three former Peelites (Gladstone, Cardwell and De Grey), with three Liberals (Childers, Goschen and Bruce) and two Radicals (Lowe and Bright.)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work