• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Would a Proportional Representation system produce a more representative and effective Government?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Would a Proportional Representation system produce a more representative and effective Government? Three major problems occur whilst answering this question. Firstly, how representative is the current (Past-The-First-Post) system. Secondly what determines a representative and an effective government and thirdly what devices does a PR system provide that will contribute to a more representative and effective government. Using FPTP in a constituency, one MP is elected and therefore, the people of that constituency will know who to ask or pursue if they have a query etc. In a multi-member constituency, in which a number of parties are represented, this would not be as easy. An effective government can be one that is considered to have a broad basis of support from the electorate whilst providing a stable government. It is vital for an effective government to be able to implement policies successfully unlike the 1997 Poll tax, which had to be withdrawn as it was heavily challenged by critics and public. ...read more.

Middle

In the 2001 election, Labour got 43% of the total popular vote whereas all the other parties got 57% - yet Labour maintained its very powerful position in Parliament with 413 MP's out of 659. It can be claimed that such a percentage of votes should not have given Labour such large Parliamentary majorities - but the workings of the FPTP system allows for just such an occurrence. Lord Hailsham once referred to this system as an "elective dictatorship" in that a powerful government can be created with overwhelming Parliamentary power which can usually push through its required legislation - but with only a minority of the country supporting it. At the 1997 national election, the Liberal Democrats gained 16.8% of the votes but only got 46 seats. Labour won 43.2% of the votes and gained 419 seats. Not only can the government be elected on less than half of the electorates votes but at a proportionate level, the Liberal Democrats should have got around 106 seats in Westminster if their representation was based on similar support for the Labour Party. ...read more.

Conclusion

won a constituency vote in the 1997 election and he lost his attempt to win another independent seat in 2001 using FPTP. An argument put forward against FPTP is that it might put people off of voting in an election for a minority party as they know that their vote will be wasted. The two-party system (which can sometimes been seen both positive and negative) is usually eliminated using PR and the end result is more 'pluralist'. The possibility of single-party 'elective dictatorship' is greatly diminished although does not completely rule out the possibility as can be seen from the elections in Sweden using PR system. The two main PR systems that I will analyse are AMS and STV. The STV system is in use in Australia (for the Senate), the Republic of Ireland and in Northern Ireland (for European elections and also for elections to the new Northern Ireland Assembly) This system assumes that the country is divided into multi-member constituency and parties may put up as many candidates as there are seats available in that constituency. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Comparing the German and Russian systems of government

    The prime minister is selected by the president but must be approved by the Duma. If the president's choice is rejected however, the chamber can be dissolved by the president and new elections called. The Russian president, unlike the German counterpart, has strong control over his executive branch.

  2. How effective was the response of Lord Liverpool's government to the domestic problems they ...

    By showing such solidarity, it could make an impression on the public that if the government were so confident of their actions, they couldn't have been doing wrong, and so some may have been influenced that the government were in the right.

  1. Party system in India

    As the BJP gained strength, the effort by the Janata Dal and other regional parties of the United Front to work with the third alternative (to the Congress and the BJP)

  2. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    It would bring hardship and repression, but there would be no going back to the securities of the past. The population were no longer going to accept policies the Government might undemocratically choose. This was a period of political reform.

  1. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    in the former Scottish Office were divided between the Scottish Executive and the Secretary of State for Scotland. The ministerial powers and duties relating to devolved matters were transferred to the Scottish Ministers in the Scottish Executive while the responsibilities relating to reserved matters were retained by the Secretary of State for Scotland.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    because he or she is elected without it, or because he or she has too few votes to be elected, then the vote is transferred to the voter's second choice candidate, and so on. In this way, most of the votes help to elect a candidate and far fewer votes are wasted.

  1. Political parties and representation

    Pareto, Michels, "the iron law of oligarchy" - but even J S Mill argued that the British parliament should include some non-elected experts/elites. This in turn relates to important differences in theories about the nature of representation (see next). (3)

  2. Is Britain a two-party or a multi party system, or something else?

    The two main parties - The Labour Party, and The Conservative Party - had a very class based support traditionally. With the decline of affiliation with a particular class, it can be argued that people looked to other parties and particular pressure groups, instead of the 'traditional working class party' as an example.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work