• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Would a Proportional Representation system produce a more representative and effective Government?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Would a Proportional Representation system produce a more representative and effective Government? Three major problems occur whilst answering this question. Firstly, how representative is the current (Past-The-First-Post) system. Secondly what determines a representative and an effective government and thirdly what devices does a PR system provide that will contribute to a more representative and effective government. Using FPTP in a constituency, one MP is elected and therefore, the people of that constituency will know who to ask or pursue if they have a query etc. In a multi-member constituency, in which a number of parties are represented, this would not be as easy. An effective government can be one that is considered to have a broad basis of support from the electorate whilst providing a stable government. It is vital for an effective government to be able to implement policies successfully unlike the 1997 Poll tax, which had to be withdrawn as it was heavily challenged by critics and public. ...read more.

Middle

In the 2001 election, Labour got 43% of the total popular vote whereas all the other parties got 57% - yet Labour maintained its very powerful position in Parliament with 413 MP's out of 659. It can be claimed that such a percentage of votes should not have given Labour such large Parliamentary majorities - but the workings of the FPTP system allows for just such an occurrence. Lord Hailsham once referred to this system as an "elective dictatorship" in that a powerful government can be created with overwhelming Parliamentary power which can usually push through its required legislation - but with only a minority of the country supporting it. At the 1997 national election, the Liberal Democrats gained 16.8% of the votes but only got 46 seats. Labour won 43.2% of the votes and gained 419 seats. Not only can the government be elected on less than half of the electorates votes but at a proportionate level, the Liberal Democrats should have got around 106 seats in Westminster if their representation was based on similar support for the Labour Party. ...read more.

Conclusion

won a constituency vote in the 1997 election and he lost his attempt to win another independent seat in 2001 using FPTP. An argument put forward against FPTP is that it might put people off of voting in an election for a minority party as they know that their vote will be wasted. The two-party system (which can sometimes been seen both positive and negative) is usually eliminated using PR and the end result is more 'pluralist'. The possibility of single-party 'elective dictatorship' is greatly diminished although does not completely rule out the possibility as can be seen from the elections in Sweden using PR system. The two main PR systems that I will analyse are AMS and STV. The STV system is in use in Australia (for the Senate), the Republic of Ireland and in Northern Ireland (for European elections and also for elections to the new Northern Ireland Assembly) This system assumes that the country is divided into multi-member constituency and parties may put up as many candidates as there are seats available in that constituency. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Is Britain a two-party or a multi party system, or something else?

    Though the electorate have a chance to change this perception, they do not. This is obviously different to one-party systems typically found in now-collapsed states such as the Soviet Union.14 He argues that The Conservatives have dominated twentieth century politics.

  2. How effective was the response of Lord Liverpool's government to the domestic problems they ...

    By showing such solidarity, it could make an impression on the public that if the government were so confident of their actions, they couldn't have been doing wrong, and so some may have been influenced that the government were in the right.

  1. Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend ...

    Jones & Kavanagh (1990) suggest that another benefit connected with minority parties is that it reduces the "bargaining or 'blackmail' power of a small party" which could be critical in a hanging Parliament. What is seen to be another important advantage of the FPTP system is that due to it

  2. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    When war arrived, Pitt fought to protect the vital commercial and colonial interests, he refused to restore the French monarchy. One of the most horrifying lessons of the French Revolution for the upper classes was, according to Barnett 2002, the working class people could turn against them.

  1. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    While Westminster remains important in establishing the financial and policy frameworks within which Scottish local authorities and devolved government operate, 62 per cent of local councillors said Westminster had become less important to local government.

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    property owners or bourgeoisie, overthrow the system and "after a period of state socialism eventually establish a society without state or property", so that everyone could be equal. As Karl Marx declared, the principle of material distribution would be: "From each according to his ability, to each according his needs!"

  1. America has a two-party political system.

    However some historians see the move as trying to reward wealthy merchants by the clever usage of tariffs and taxes. His first proposal was to pay off the war debt; he planned to do this by taking on the debt of the states collectively and paying them off, i.e.

  2. Whether or not Parliament is effective as a government watchdog

    The House of Commons main function is to scrutinise and hold the executive part of government to account or act as a Government watchdog. This is making the government justify its decisions and forcing it to answer for it conduct.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work