• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Psychological Attachment

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent does psychological research show that disruption of attachment is harmful to children's development? There has been lots of research made about whether or not early disruption has a detrimental effect on infants later in life. Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis stated that infants need a continuous relationship with their mothers and if it is disrupted at all during the critical period, (first 5 years) then it can have a bad effect on the rate of their development. He also said that any separation or deprivation can hinder a child's ability to form peers and make relationships work in later life. Finally, he thought that up until the age of 6, children were still vulnerable and disruption will still effect badly. ...read more.

Middle

Barrett did a study in 1977 which simply reviewed various other studies that had previously been completed. He found that if children have already formed a secure attachment then they can cope with early separation better than those who have an insecure attachment and they come especially distressed. This could be seen as supporting the statement however he hasn't taken into consideration other factors that could be contributing to later distress. Rutler did two studies, in 1976 and 1981. Both of which can be seen as proving that disruption is harmful as he found that separation led to delinquency, however it can also be seen as criticising the statement because there could have been other issues that had a detrimental effect, for example poor living conditions or poverty. ...read more.

Conclusion

This criticises it as it was proved that in some cases, children that were badly affected by separation when they were younger were able to recover and form perfectly good bonds with peers etc in later life. So, although there is some evidence to prove that disruption of attachment is harmful to children's development, there is also sufficient evidence to disprove it. Therefore you cannot say that disruption does affect later life however you cannot say that it doesn't either. However, the evidence that we do have, (Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis, Bifulco et al,) is strong evidence and is widely known so it is a strong argument and therefore a valid point to say that is an infant is separated from their mother or father in early life then it will have some effect in one way or another to their later life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work