• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Stanley Milgrams Obedience to Authority study and the Stanford Prison Experiment both show that everyday people react in ways we find unimaginable when put in certain situations.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ricky C. Camus / BSAT3-2 February 6, 2012 Obedience to Authority Stanley Milgram's Obedience to Authority study and the Stanford Prison Experiment both show that everyday people react in ways we find unimaginable when put in certain situations. The Stanley Milgram's Obedience to Authority study tested how people would respond to an authority figure who told them to do something that conflicted with their personal beliefs. The Stanford Prison Experiment studied the effects of being a prison guard or prisoner. While both studies may be very unethical today, I believe they both show that everyone is likely to act, possibly, in an unethical manner depending on the situation. These studies, in current society's views, would be extremely unethical; especially the Prison Experiment. ...read more.

Middle

Maybe we can empathize more with people because of the information gained. However, I don't see it as being worth the damage it did to others' lives. The results of the studies I find to be interesting. Many people believe they are different than everyone else. We are even raised that way so we don't feel bad about all of our physical and occasional mental differences; even to the extent that people start to deny that they would act in a way they find unethical when put in the same or similar situation as another person who acted in an unethical manner. These studies showed that people act in a possible set manner, no matter who they are. ...read more.

Conclusion

When this happens it becomes even harder to resist doing something unethical because everyone else is doing it so the thought might be 'It can't be that bad right?'That is for you to decide, not me. I can't tell you what is right and what is wrong. It's all a matter of opinion. In conclusion, I feel that Stanley Milgram's Obedience to Authority study and the Stanford Prison Experiment, while being unethical, both showed that people are not necessarily as different as we are brought up to believe. In fact, people are quite similar. I don't believe that these tests will be conducted again now or in the near future because of the distress it can cause people, so we have to hope the studies weren't just a matter of chance. Bottom of Form ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The candidate responds fairly well, with a good understanding of the studies, but a lot of what is written here does not very explicitly show any deep-set knowledge of the studies or why they were conducted (contextual research is imperative ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The candidate responds fairly well, with a good understanding of the studies, but a lot of what is written here does not very explicitly show any deep-set knowledge of the studies or why they were conducted (contextual research is imperative for these social studies; they were not conducted for the sake of subjecting humans to uncomfortable conditions). It appears the candidate is trying to refute the research due to both studies' hugely unethical conduct. Whilst the argument is fairly well-made, it would serve the candidate better not to write as if speaking, with frequent spoken discourse markers such as "Yes" and rhetoric such as "Where does that get us?". It is not an objective essay at all, and a counter-argument should be sought, understanding the need for slightly unethical research (could Milgram have studied obedience in any other way?).

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis is not very apparent here. Where the candidate may have been directed to comment on the strengths and weakness of such highly unethical research (e.g. a strength being we're able to study complex behaviour and to disregard ethics is the only way, and a weakness being that the research can cause enormous mental harm to participants), this candidate simply 'talks' about the studies. The premise of the piece is not clear, and the candidate neither makes a good argument for or against the studies.

I recommend writing a clearer introduction, outlining the purpose behind each study and why they were conducted, so to make the purpose of the essay clearer. Also, the introduction should detail which standpoint the candidate is taking, as it becomes ambiguous otherwise.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Writing is fair, but for such a jargonised subject as Psychology, I would expect to see a much more proficient use of the appropriate terminology, such as "right to withdraw" and "lack of informed consent". The grammar for the most part is very good and the the essay is cohesive, but the candidate must work on the paragraphing skills as the block of text can become daunting even to examiners, who will deduct marks from candidates who cannot show evidence of the ability to present essays clearly.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 30/06/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In this essay I will evaluate and explain the Social Learning Theory (SLT), which ...

    5 star(s)

    * The structure allows the focus to be maintained on the topic of the interview. * Additionally less training is required by the interviewer and the interviewer is more likely to be objective due to the structure they have to follow.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Findings of the Obedience Studies

    4 star(s)

    However, that person was an actor, and the cries were pre-recorded, yet the participants weren't aware of that. Milgram continuously gave the participants prods, which led them to believe that they had no other alternative than to continue. This proves that there was no sign of a right to withdraw.

  1. Highlight the key features/tenets of Freud's and Murray's theories of personality. Identify key similarities ...

    On the other hand, Murray suggested environmental press. He pointed out that the outside influences also affect people's personality. Lastly, both of them used in-depth interview to collect data. For Freud, he interviewed his patients and asked them to lie on the sofa; he tried to establish a close relationship with the patients so that they could recall their repressed feeling easily.

  2. "Some mothers choose to stay at home and look after their children while others ...

    because of the caregiver's ability to satisfy instinctual needs. Instincts are "unlearned patterns of behaviour that exists in all members of a particular species, and which appear under certain circumstances". Freud believed that healthy attachments are formed when feeding practices satisfy the baby's needs for food and oral pleasure (oral stage of psychosexual development).

  1. What is forensic science? How can it's study help in the detection and prevention ...

    in identifying the cause and progress of diseases by examining tissue and fluid from the body. Especially one who determines the cause of someone's death by conducting an autopsy), together they investigate the cause of death with suspicious circumstances. The forensic scientist assists the pathologist by determining the blood type,

  2. A study of the psychology of belief with reference to the influence of Freud. ...

    sinful, it is easy to see why sexual feelings may lead to feelings of guilt. Particularly as sexual feelings are present throughout all stages of childhood that Freud identifies in the following ways: from birth to the age of eighteen months the child goes through what Freud named the "Oral Stage."

  1. Memory Experiment

    For instance, if I used the word cat for the visual memory test I would use something like dog for the acoustic test. I will try to vary the 15 words on the separate tests and throughout the 30 I will make sure that nothing gets repeated.

  2. Gender Differences In Prejudice

    The cause of all this, Adorno suggested, was an unconscious hostility towards their parents who, apparently, gave them a harsh upbringing and faced them with criticism. The hostility which had built up was displaced and redirected towards weaker people who could not harm them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work