• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Whose life is it anyway?” is not just a play about a man who has lost the will to live.

Extracts from this document...


Class Essay- "Whose life is it anyway?" is not just a play about a man who has lost the will to live. In the play "Whose life is it anyway?" the man who has lost the will to live is most prominently someone suffering from some form of hindrance. The author Brian Clark puts forward an indefinite idea of uncertainty for the man's future. Throughout the play it continues to make us contemplate on the issues of quality of life, personal choice, authority and relationships. It is for these reasons that the play is more than simply the idea of a man's will of life. A man who had a substantial quality to perform what he lives for would have the urge to live on. However, if he deteriorated to a quadriplegic like Ken (the main character in the play) yet before, experienced a life with all the passion, freedom, love and creation he wanted then what would the effect have on him? ...read more.


Mr. Hill (Ken's solicitor) explains to Ken after his request in being discharged what is occurring. "Mr. Harrison, I will be perfectly plain. Dr. Emerson claims that you are not in a sufficiently healthy mental state to make a rational decision..." Despite this outlook Mr. Hill decides to help grant Ken's wishes to die as he believes Ken mentally stable by talking to him. Mr. Hill is not forced to and deep down he does not enjoy the idea to justify his client to die. "Can anyone prove that they are sane?" Both these examples show that personal choice is very important as it can be taken away or used for good pretenses. Authority over others becomes a dilemma when we are actually questioning the law of control over human lives. Whether it is crossing boundaries of mankind to decide what is the justification of another man's life. Resulting in not serving the truthful purpose it once was as a basis of keeping humans rectified. ...read more.


When Ken goes to court, Sister Anderson who had been seeing Ken for the last couple of months and attending him showed concern for him. "I thought this morning, when he was talking about the compensation, he was beginning to plan for the future". Therefore, this proves the play does not only include the man who has lost the will to live but others play an important part in the play to contribute emotion and feedback. Evidently, "Whose life is it anyway" is not just a play explaining a man who has lost the will to live. This is due to the main themes of quality of life, personal choice, authority and relationships, which adds to the complex nature of the play. Ken repeatedly emphasizes the point that "It is not undignified if the man wants to stay alive, but I must restate that the dignity starts with his choice. He chooses a dignified death". After all these conflicts for someone to finally emerge to resulting in death it is still an extensive revelation given the chance to continue life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. Euthanasia essay

    The wedge argument ( or slippery slope argument ) maintains that euthanasia is the thin end of the wedge - that once one accepts this principle, the door is open for all sorts of other procedures and abuses including infanticide.

  2. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    "It was just dinner."(Ken talking to Dr.Scott) This reveals to the reader what romantic action had gone on and whom the conversation is taking place between. "It looks good tonight.... Minced beef." Here Dr.Scott proves that she is not comfortable talking about this subject, so she tries to change the topic of conversation, using his dinner as a scapegoat.

  1. Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own ...

    He feels that with lack of control, he won't be able to direct anything and so there won't be any direction to his life. His conclusion of death is the only way out of his problem. On the other hand, the doctors being a part of the optimism industry are arguing to save Ken's life.

  2. Whose Life Is It Anyway? How does Brain Clark persuade the audience that Ken's ...

    This makes us feel very sorry for Ken, because everyone has the right to be treated as a human being. "All you people have the same technique. When I say something really awkward you just pretend I haven't said anything at all.

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    The weaker arguments people has for Euthanasia were; * Most people would have their pets put down if they were suffering; this would in most cases be regarded as kindness. Why can't the same kindness be given to humans? The weaker arguments people have against Euthanasia were; * A dying patient may not be able to make a rational decision.

  2. How does the playwright Brian Clark present the conflict between Ken Harrison and his ...

    The title in a way shows that it is meant to be, partly, a clash of wills between two sides. In Act 1 the audience finds out about the main character, Ken Harrison, about his accident and the injuries it caused. Dr.

  1. How does Brian Clark interest and entertain his Audience in the play 'Whose Life ...

    It is considered that a human life is more important than an animals but this is not true. Both species feel pain and have the right to live or die so why put one over the other? If it is fair to kill an animal and not be called a

  2. Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    Emerson is of the opinion that Ken can live a life and that he is mentally ill when he effectively wishes to take his own life. Dr Emerson believes that he is right in his role as a Doctor and ethically, it is on this that he fights to keep Ken in the hospital.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work