• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A God who intervenes miraculously in the world cannot be benevolent

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A God who intervenes miraculously in the world cannot be benevolent . Discuss This statement is a paradox in itself, as it assumes that God can act miraculously, and that He is benevolent. This can be seen as a contradiction, as these two beliefs are incompatible. A God who intervenes miraculously in the world cannot be benevolent, because of the presence of natural and moral evil in the world. Surely a God who was able to act through miracles and prevent such evil and chose not to would be partisan, which would obviously detract from his benevolence. Therefore this statement poses a challenge to the theist, who believes in both a benevolent God who cares for humanity, and an omnipotent God who is able to perform the miraculous. ...read more.

Middle

Gareth Moore develops this point further, and suggests that it is possible that God is irrelevant to the concept of miracle, and that miracles are simply events, which cannot be explained. With this interpretation there is the implication that if miracles cannot be explained, the motivation for God creating them out of his benevolence is even harder to establish. If there were reasons and explanations for miracles, and God was seen to decide when reasons are justified for a miracle to take place, it would be hard to equate the God of the Bible who is benevolent with such harsh and partisan actions. However there is evidence in the Old Testament, that suggests that God is partisan, for example the idea that God will come to judge us on Judgement Day seems unjust and shallow. ...read more.

Conclusion

However as Kenny points out, 'God can only do that which is logically possible for God to do.' Thus if God's power or benevolence is limited then His actions will be limited accordingly. We have no way of measuring His power or goodness, because it is a relative concept. To talk of goodness as a measuring stick would imply that we know the extent of it. It could be argued that as finite beings we cannot grasp the concept of God's infinite goodness, and therefore cannot judge Him in relation to the suffering of this finite world. By questioning God's actions, and judging His acts of miraculous intervention in the world, it implies that we know the extent of God's power and goodness, and thus know how He should act. However this is not the case, and we cannot understand God's actions logically but only through faith. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ailsa Bulloch Theology Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    who spoke in the name of the Lord, as an example of suffering and patience" (James 5:10) ,this shows that not only will God find the worthy but he will also find the people who have so much faith that they keep quiet and patient when suffering or in pain.

  2. Explain how miracles are portrayed in the Bible.

    Surely they were people too? Some might argue that they were against God and therefore they were the advocates of the devil, but what happened to God being forgiving? Often, particularly in the Old Testament, Gods motives are brought into question, particularly in the book of Joshua when the fall of Jericho takes place.

  1. Preliminary Interpretation of Descartes Meditations

    I shall imagine myself as if I had no hands, no eyes, no flesh, no blood, no senses at all, but as if my beliefs in all these things were false" The hypothesis of an evil deceiver gives him

  2. "The miracle stories in the New Testament suggest a God, who can do the ...

    It is obviously clear of the possibility of logic to feed such a crowd with only 7 items possibly proving that the writers wished to show that Jesus can do the impossible through the power of God. Another case in which it seems to show that god can do the logically impossible is the raising of the dead.

  1. Why does God allow Evil if he is omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly benevolent?

    Surely from my side of view, he cannot be both on the same time in order for evil to not exist. The whole idea of "Free Will" sounds like a quick excuse from the religious side because it has holes in it.

  2. The Old Testament.

    as a roof. He fixed the crossbar... posted guards; He commanded them not to let her waters escape" 11 and "Then God said, 'Let there be a dome... to separate one body of water from the other.'" Genesis 1:6 "All the fountains of the great abyss burst forth, and the floodgates of the sky were opened..."

  1. Evil and a God of love are incompatible so there cannot be a God ...

    It also shifts God to the side, implying that either he was unable to foresee that Adam and Eve would choose evil, or that he is unable to correct the effects of the fall. However, God is still the God off the bible, then he both knows everything about the future and has the power to do anything he wants.

  2. The Holocaust - personal response to Anne Frank's diary and the problem of evil ...

    In her bedroom there were posters of famous actors, the royal family and theatre. Her passion for reading was mainly due to her father, Otto Frank, having a vast library as he encouraged his children to read. Anne was born in Frankfurt, Germany but grew up in Holland, therefore she was also to some extent a linguist.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work