• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Single Eye As An Attack on Puritanism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A Single Eye As An Attack on Puritanism A Contextual Essay by Elliot Tapper Professor Paul B. Cheney Handed In Friday, November 22, 2002 The seventeenth century was a tumultuous time in England; rife with revolution she saw her governmental system, religious affairs and legal code completely overhauled. All across Europe this type of change was common, but England's changes were brought about largely by the influences of and reactions to a variation of Calvinist Protestantism known as Puritanism. Its followers clashed violently with the Anglican establishment in a civil war and by 1650 the Puritans had gained power over the Anglican monarchists. Executing Charles I, Oliver Cromwell took the helm of the nation placing Puritan values center stage1. Puritan morality, strict adherence to the scriptures and rigid belief in predestination encountered active resistance, inspiring counter-revolutions in thought that would put freedom at the forefront of the English consciousness. Representing the extreme of society's reaction to Puritan faith a group known as the Ranters2 emerged, publishing pamphlets that attacked the fundamental tenets of Puritanism. Lawrence Clarkson, a frontrunner among the Ranters, achieved infamy after having published a pamphlet entitled A Single Eye, which was so radical that it landed him in jail. ...read more.

Middle

And it must be noted that a view more moderate than that of the Puritans, one that did not insist on black and white arbitrary definitions of nature, would not have been susceptible to this attack, and therefore Clarkson exposes the problem to be exclusively Puritan. Establishing the cause of the problem as the Puritan interpretation of faith, we may realize that all this while that Clarkson has been prophetically insisting that "[he] shall make darkness light before them"13 he has indeed been referring to how he wishes to correct the views of his audience. To this end, we see a shift from attack on the Puritans to the construction of independent arguments. Underlying Clarkson's following propositions is the notion that "when as a man in purity in light, acts the same acts, in relation to the act, not the title: this man doth not swear, whore nor steal."14 Essentially, since all is in the 'eye' of the beholder, a "single, pure eye," then in all "there appeareth Devil and God"15; it is only a matter of semantics that separates the two. The development of his argument begins as he writes, "consider what act soever is done by thee, in light and love, is light, and lovely; though it be an act called adultery ...read more.

Conclusion

He shows that by a virtue of the free will of the human mind, the Puritan definitions of sin make us all sinners, and therefore Puritanism does not take into account human nature and emotion. Thus as Puritanism is inapplicable to free humans, we see both that it is flawed and that some of the things that make Puritanism so bad also illuminate flaws in Christianity as a whole. Any belief predicated on interpretation is inherently flawed, and therefore the reliance on scriptures allows Christianity to morph into misguided forms like Puritanism. Clarkson's solution, essentially to not judge others and to prevent the restriction of free will, implies that the church should not be involved with government and law, for it should not be the interpreted decree of God by which you decide who is empowered or who is a sinner. Indeed, as Clarkson requests that we see God as an all loving being that does not discern between what individuals consider good and evil, and as the law requires one to make those discernments, then God necessarily has no place in the affairs of the state. Much may be derived from A Single Eye in this fashion, but empirically we see that implicit in the arguments against Puritanism are arguments for a universal overhaul of Christian dogma and the ways in which society interacts with and views religion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    Article The bodies of the three teenage girls murdered by a fellow student at Heath High School in West Paducah, Kentucky were not yet cold, let alone buried, before the students of the prayer group that was shot at announced, "We forgive you, Mike," said the parents of the three girls referring to Michael Corneal, the murderer.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Through Freud's work with patients with hysteria, he was able to conclude that unpleasant memories that are trapped in the subconscious can later re-emerge in the form of hysterical behaviour, for example compulsive hand-washing. His work with dreams let him to conclude that the unconscious mind compromise large vast stores of forgotten information.

  1. How does Paul change his speeches according to his audience?

    Paul talks about the rejection of Jesus and the role of Pilate who makes Jesus die on a tree! But Jesus rises and there are witnesses! That links up to section three of his speech, the proof: Psalm 2, Psalm 16 and Isaiah 55.

  2. a1 a2 a3 and part b religious coursework

    My conclusion is that between Christianity and the traditional view of Islam their cosmologies are relatively the same except for the structure. A2 The scientific cosmology contradicts the religious and have provided an answer to the universe for atheists and scientists alike.

  1. Asses Sartre's COntribution Toward the philosophy of freedom

    The final cause argument however comforting it may be does however set restrictions on our actions. Instead of having the ability to choose what we do we are being lead, unaware throughout choices we make in order to fulfil our telos, in the example of a doctor for example they

  2. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    admit that the whole vast amount of difference between these forms has primarily arisen simply from variability'. (Darwin. Variation of animals and Plants under domestication) Thus Darwin was seen to attack the first premise of the teleological argument that the world had signs of design by suggesting that the apparent

  1. The sanctity of life

    There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave or free, male nor female for you are one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. I think that this means that everyone is the same to god no matter what, nothing will make any difference.

  2. "The Sinner is often the Saint." In what way does Greene explore this paradox ...

    and its sultry climate as a cause of their boredom, conceit and corruption, Scobie values the beauty around him and feels the country is fascinating beyond its surface of hostility: "The magic of this place never failed him: here he kept his foothold on the very edge of a strange continent."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work