• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Study of Beliefs about Euthanasia between two religions: Unit 3B, Section 1.

Extracts from this document...


Jessica Johnson 5/7/2007 A Study of Beliefs about Euthanasia between two religions: Unit 3B, Section 1 For this essay I have decided to study the two religions Christianity and Buddhism. Like Christianity, Buddhism has many major denominations around the world; Thera vada, Mahayana and Zen to name a few. However, I am only going to focus on Christianity and Buddhism as a whole, quoting teachings from the Bible (Old and New Testament), and then referring to the two major denominations of Anglican and Roman Catholic when their points on euthanasia1 are absolute. I have chosen these particular denominations of Christianity because they have contrasting values. The process of ending someone's life can take place in a number of forms. By lethal injection or a form of lethal drug, for example. Euthanasia is illegal in most countries, the United Kingdom for one, but it is legal in one state, Oregon, in America, and also The Netherlands. Some people travel to these places where it is legal for euthanasia to take place2, so they don't risk any involved persons getting arrested. People can want to have euthanasia performed on them for a number of reasons. These include terminal illnesses, where each day the physical and emotional pain gets worse and worse. In cases like these, some people just want to break free from the pain, and believe ending their life is the only way of doing that. There are four different types of Euthanasia: Active-doctors giving a lethal drug intending to end a patient's life. Passive-doctors withdrawing medical treatment intending to end a patient's life. Voluntary-when the patient asks to be killed by another person Involuntary-when the patient is killed without his/her knowledge or consent. ...read more.


And therefore if someone wants to end their life, we have to respect their decision. Some may say that this is not an effective way of showing love, that is, to kill them means that you love them. Of course it isn't, for if every time people fell in love then there would be an awful lot of murders going on. I mean that if we truly love someone, regardless of our feelings of anxiety or hurt for when they are gone, we would be able to sympathise with their pain and discomfort in this world. This is why some Christians do believe in the goodness of euthanasia. This is a situation ethical approach. Palliative Care is when we care for someone who is close to death, making his or her last few days alive as comfortable and as happy as possible. Christians believe this is very important, so as to prepare them for when they reach heaven. Therefore if someone wants to die, then Christians believe they should be treated with utmost respect and comfort. Rather than try to persuade someone to re-think about ending his or her life, special Christian homes can try to prepare and relax the patient, ready for death. Some homes hope that this will change the patient's mind, that they will be at ease and their faith will keep them going. The Bible would be read to them, things like John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life". This means that whoever believes in Jesus will live with God in heaven forever. ...read more.


It would be very hard, of course, however I think that if in the long-term they will just continue to deteriorate, then as I am Buddhist and it is in my nature to bring peace and harmony to others, I would have to let them free. Since Buddhists believe in reincarnation the manner of death is of great importance. Bad karma may affect anyone who helps9. Conclusion Following on from the understanding of the two religions two main points can be drawn out from the essay. In Christianity, the vast majority are against euthanasia. Not only does it disobey God's wishes of "loving your neighbour" but it also puts Christians in a position of playing God, and therefore going against His plans. Also euthanasia is illegal, and as Christians are good people, violating the governmental law would be a serious sin in itself. Through the passages listed in the Bible, we can see that Christians follow God's wishes, such as "Do not kill" and so I think the majority would put God's rules before morals. In contrast, Buddhists cannot take the point of view that killing someone would be against God's wishes, because they don't believe in a god. Instead, being kind and considerate to others lets them receive good karma, and so helps them with their next life. In this way, euthanasia can be looked upon as good or bad, depending on the context of it. As a Buddhist, it is very important to die with dignity and naturally. Euthanasia isn't natural, quite the opposite! So therefore a high majority of monks would be against it, however in the end it would be a personal decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    A disadvantage of this is that the results are limited as they provide numerical descriptions rather than detailed narrative and generally provide less elaborate accounts of human perception. One advantage of qualitative data is that it provides depth and detail; this is because it looks deeper than analysing ranks and counts by recording attitudes, feelings and behaviours.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    Together with the Sanctity of Life, these two teachings could be used to support the view that euthanasia is wrong because practising it would be destroying God's sacred notion of human life. Some Christians use 'Natural Law'. This is the idea of 'there's a time to be born and a time to die'.

  1. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    than necessary, 'Thou shalt not kill; but needst not strive officiously to keep alive,' (Poet Arthur Hugh Clough). This is the 'natural' idea. For example, if a life support machine is keeping someone alive it is morally acceptable to turn it off if it is likely that they will not pull through, and let death come naturally.

  2. The Legal Position On Euthanasia around the World.

    Thus legalising active voluntary euthanasia. However the court specifically ruled that this did not apply to degenerative diseases like Parkinson's or Alzheimers. These changes were made as a result of public pressure for change. Netherlands Active Euthanasia is legal since 2002., as is assisted suicide inspecific cases under special circumstances.

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    In 'The Sanctity of Life' by M. Wilcockson, he states that there are five main qualities that determine whether a life may be taken or preserved; Desires, Preferences, Autonomy, Rights and Contract, and Life as a conscious being. The desire to live is to determine if a person's life is worthwhile.

  2. Is Euthanasia morally acceptable?

    In developing secondary questions I originally had four, but through out the course of my research I came to realise that the last of them; where is euthanasia legal now, had no argument, it was just pure fact and would not contribute to the answer to the hypothesis so was redundant, thus I dismissed it to concentrate on the others.

  1. Free essay

    Euthanasia - Good Or Bad?

    What are people who want euthanasia like? Selfish? They'll make their decision while thinking about nobody but themselves. They don't even think about how their family and friends will take the news and how much they'll miss them. If the person wanting euthanasia loved them dearly then they'd live on for them.

  2. Choose a case which you consider to be of crucial importance for medical ethics ...

    at which it has become almost empty of any real content and when it involves the sacrifice of other important values such as human dignity and freedom of choice"5 Clearly this supports the ideas of Harris and Glover that are mentioned above, the idea that life becomes empty of content

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work