• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A summary of the Cosmological argument according to Thomas Aquinas and Copleston.

Extracts from this document...


Tom Smolen A summary of the Cosmological argument according to Thomas Aquinas and Copleston. The Cosmological argument is basically an argument that begins with the existence of the Universe and tries to prove God's existence. Cosmos means the Universe. In order to argue the Cosmological argument one must already believe that the Universe is there for a reason and be willing to ask: "Why is there a Universe?" The first step in the argument is the premise- there is a Universe. We know there is a Universe because we are constantly experiencing it. St Thomas Aquinas put forward five proofs for the existence of God and the first 3 are Cosmological arguments. The first argument is that everything in the Universe is moved by something else. ...read more.


These to arguments are both similar to Aristotle's ideas about cause and purpose in relation to God. He too said that there must be a Prime, or Unmoved Mover. The Third argument however, is the argument that was refined by Copleston and often monopolies the phrase "Cosmological argument". It is an argument based on the contingency of the Universe. Everything around us is contingent, or dependant upon something else for is reason for existence. For example, a child's cause is the meeting and the actions of their parents. That is not to say however, that one factor in the cause of an event is a sufficient reason, it is only a partial reason. A reason for the existence of anything is a combination of all the causes of it. ...read more.


The important point about God is that it is non-contingent, so it does not depend upon anything else for the reason for its own existence. Copleston made it clearer in an argument with Bertrand Russell in 1948. God is not the cause of itself, but it contains its own sufficient reason for existence. When questioned what could be counted as a sufficient reason, Copleston defines it as "an explanation adequate for existence of some particular being. Cause can be a kind of sufficient reason for contingent beings, but God has a sufficient reason in itself, but not a cause. If one accepts the main points of the argument, i.e: The Universe has a reason for existing, and that must exist outside of itself, then, as Copleston defined this necessary being as "a being that must and cannot not exist". Bertrand Russell argues against both of the Cosmological arguments put forward by Aquinas and Copleston. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    The first criticism is that morality can be explained without the existence of God. Some philosophers argue that morality is a man made tool which helps us to meet the demands of our society. Against Newman, the conscience can be seen as a product of the brain activated by the demands of living within close proximity of others.

  2. Examine the key features of the cosmological argument for the existence of God St ...

    This makes infinity impossible. Finally the Kalam argument, also known as the beginning argument, agrees with Aquinas' beliefs that infinity cannot exists, this believe proves that something must have started the world.

  1. How does Paul change his speeches according to his audience?

    Paul's speech takes the form of a historical retrospect, just as Stephen's defence did in Acts 6 v. 2. Paul has taken into his speech what has been said a thousand times before, in the Old Testement Kerygma. "The events Proclaimed in Paul's speech are shown to have taken place

  2. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    Faurbach in his time declared that theology is physiology, but nevertheless in the sense that they conceive man as without conscious movement towards God. (Schmaus. 1968. Pp18-3) Looking into this in more detail it would assume that there is always a synthesis between divine revelation and the human response.

  1. Outline Aquinas Cosmological argument

    For instance, if we know where we have come from then surely, it could be argued, we have some idea of where we are going? Theists could claim that if life begins with God then life has a purpose with God.

  2. Frederick Copleston and Bertrand Russell's and their responses to the Cosmological argument.

    Hence there must be something which has necessary existence, which can endure when other things cease, and so bring them back into existence.

  1. Bertrand Russell and Atheism.

    The atheist cannot be expected to prove God's non-existence; however, one should not accept God's existence without good reasons. (Ditto for pink elephants.) I think it is absurd that children are 'born into' a religion. No one wants to admit that they believe in their religion simply because they were brought up that way.

  2. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God?

    initiate the change in itself, hence would be actual and potential - a contradiction. For example, wood would be hot already if it could make itself hot, but it can't be hot already, otherwise there would be no change. The woods' actuality is the fact it is not hot already

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work