• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A summary of the Cosmological argument according to Thomas Aquinas and Copleston.

Extracts from this document...


Tom Smolen A summary of the Cosmological argument according to Thomas Aquinas and Copleston. The Cosmological argument is basically an argument that begins with the existence of the Universe and tries to prove God's existence. Cosmos means the Universe. In order to argue the Cosmological argument one must already believe that the Universe is there for a reason and be willing to ask: "Why is there a Universe?" The first step in the argument is the premise- there is a Universe. We know there is a Universe because we are constantly experiencing it. St Thomas Aquinas put forward five proofs for the existence of God and the first 3 are Cosmological arguments. The first argument is that everything in the Universe is moved by something else. ...read more.


These to arguments are both similar to Aristotle's ideas about cause and purpose in relation to God. He too said that there must be a Prime, or Unmoved Mover. The Third argument however, is the argument that was refined by Copleston and often monopolies the phrase "Cosmological argument". It is an argument based on the contingency of the Universe. Everything around us is contingent, or dependant upon something else for is reason for existence. For example, a child's cause is the meeting and the actions of their parents. That is not to say however, that one factor in the cause of an event is a sufficient reason, it is only a partial reason. A reason for the existence of anything is a combination of all the causes of it. ...read more.


The important point about God is that it is non-contingent, so it does not depend upon anything else for the reason for its own existence. Copleston made it clearer in an argument with Bertrand Russell in 1948. God is not the cause of itself, but it contains its own sufficient reason for existence. When questioned what could be counted as a sufficient reason, Copleston defines it as "an explanation adequate for existence of some particular being. Cause can be a kind of sufficient reason for contingent beings, but God has a sufficient reason in itself, but not a cause. If one accepts the main points of the argument, i.e: The Universe has a reason for existing, and that must exist outside of itself, then, as Copleston defined this necessary being as "a being that must and cannot not exist". Bertrand Russell argues against both of the Cosmological arguments put forward by Aquinas and Copleston. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Frederick Copleston and Bertrand Russell's and their responses to the Cosmological argument.

    Hence there must be something which has necessary existence, which can endure when other things cease, and so bring them back into existence.

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    concept that there cannot be an infinite number of causes to an event. Some arguments for God's existence require more thought and training in terms and concepts, but this argument is basic and simple. Also, it is perfectly logical to assert that objects do not bring themselves into existence and must, therefore, have causes.

  1. Bertrand Russell and Atheism.

    That is what I believe. No matter what evil we may commit on this earth, we all will transform into our next level of existence at death. I do not believe in a judgment, a Heaven, or a Hell. I believe that through science, we simply exist and transform.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    path of a particle or light ray encounters some matter or randomly oriented curvature. v) There is some point p such that all the past directed (or future directed) spacetime paths from p start converging again. This condition implies that there is enough matter present in the universe to focus every past directed (or future directed)

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Aquinas in the fifth of the five ways propagated this argument. From the 'governance of things' Aquinas noted the ways that 'natural bodies' act in a regular fashion to achieve their aim or purpose. This shows evidence of an intelligent being, which created the world, which Aquinas believed to be God.

  2. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God?

    initiate the change in itself, hence would be actual and potential - a contradiction. For example, wood would be hot already if it could make itself hot, but it can't be hot already, otherwise there would be no change. The woods' actuality is the fact it is not hot already

  1. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    Our religious belief, as Catholics, is living a life of Christ, and of living our faith. Not just being of the faith. This is revealed through scripture and The Gospels ("The divinely revealed realities, which are contained and presented in the text of Sacred Scripture, have been written down under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit" (CCC,2002.P.29)

  2. How does Paul change his speeches according to his audience?

    Paul talks about the rejection of Jesus and the role of Pilate who makes Jesus die on a tree! But Jesus rises and there are witnesses! That links up to section three of his speech, the proof: Psalm 2, Psalm 16 and Isaiah 55.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work