• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A summary of the Cosmological argument according to Thomas Aquinas and Copleston.

Extracts from this document...


Tom Smolen A summary of the Cosmological argument according to Thomas Aquinas and Copleston. The Cosmological argument is basically an argument that begins with the existence of the Universe and tries to prove God's existence. Cosmos means the Universe. In order to argue the Cosmological argument one must already believe that the Universe is there for a reason and be willing to ask: "Why is there a Universe?" The first step in the argument is the premise- there is a Universe. We know there is a Universe because we are constantly experiencing it. St Thomas Aquinas put forward five proofs for the existence of God and the first 3 are Cosmological arguments. The first argument is that everything in the Universe is moved by something else. ...read more.


These to arguments are both similar to Aristotle's ideas about cause and purpose in relation to God. He too said that there must be a Prime, or Unmoved Mover. The Third argument however, is the argument that was refined by Copleston and often monopolies the phrase "Cosmological argument". It is an argument based on the contingency of the Universe. Everything around us is contingent, or dependant upon something else for is reason for existence. For example, a child's cause is the meeting and the actions of their parents. That is not to say however, that one factor in the cause of an event is a sufficient reason, it is only a partial reason. A reason for the existence of anything is a combination of all the causes of it. ...read more.


The important point about God is that it is non-contingent, so it does not depend upon anything else for the reason for its own existence. Copleston made it clearer in an argument with Bertrand Russell in 1948. God is not the cause of itself, but it contains its own sufficient reason for existence. When questioned what could be counted as a sufficient reason, Copleston defines it as "an explanation adequate for existence of some particular being. Cause can be a kind of sufficient reason for contingent beings, but God has a sufficient reason in itself, but not a cause. If one accepts the main points of the argument, i.e: The Universe has a reason for existing, and that must exist outside of itself, then, as Copleston defined this necessary being as "a being that must and cannot not exist". Bertrand Russell argues against both of the Cosmological arguments put forward by Aquinas and Copleston. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Dawkins has also recently written books to support Darwin's theory arguing that natural selection has given the illusion of design, and this has led to the mistake of the assumption that a designer was present. He rejects the design argument, arguing that the world was instead caused by random variations in the DNA molecules of any life form.

  2. How does Paul change his speeches according to his audience?

    Paul's speech takes the form of a historical retrospect, just as Stephen's defence did in Acts 6 v. 2. Paul has taken into his speech what has been said a thousand times before, in the Old Testement Kerygma. "The events Proclaimed in Paul's speech are shown to have taken place

  1. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    Part of this would be the explanation of how we view the trinity. "This may not be something that can be rationally approved, apart from Christian revelation." This doctrinal content, inseparable from Christian faith cannot be subsumed or left behind in some new "world theology".

  2. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    Aquinas contradicts himself as he states that something cannot be its own cause, however, then goes onto to say that God was His own cause.

  1. Examine the key features of the cosmological argument for the existence of God St ...

    He explained this in his first way because if the universe were finite then there would have never been a beginning and no first mover, which brought contingent beings into existence. He consequently deemed this as impossible. William Lain Craig also believed that the universe couldn't be infinite because you cannot add to an infinite amount.

  2. Outline Aquinas Cosmological argument

    For instance, if we know where we have come from then surely, it could be argued, we have some idea of where we are going? Theists could claim that if life begins with God then life has a purpose with God.

  1. Frederick Copleston and Bertrand Russell's and their responses to the Cosmological argument.

    Hence there must be something which has necessary existence, which can endure when other things cease, and so bring them back into existence.

  2. Bertrand Russell and Atheism.

    Regarding "God," I want to take exactly the same line. In any existential debate, the burden of proof falls on the side making the positive case. In a debate on the existence of God, that is undeniably the theistic side.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work