• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Unverse Wthout A Master - In the twentieth century, the existing individual has find a space for itself in philosophy which was a missing point until then, when questioning the right, the good and beings.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A UNIVERSE WITHOUT A MASTER In the twentieth century, the existing individual has find a space for itself in philosophy which was a missing point until then, when questioning the right, the good and beings. With the introduction of existing individual in to philosophy, the subjective world gets importance. Philosophers of the twentieth century such as Albert Camus and Jean Paul Sartre discussed individuals responsibility for their actions. Moreover Camus described the universe without the master where man is free. In a universe where there exists a master, the decision of whether an action is true or not, would be determined by the universal laws. Those laws given by the God would lead man in to his final decision for his action. However in a universe where there is no master, there would be no universal laws. Moreover each man has to decide his own actions without the guidance of a master. ...read more.

Middle

At this point man, conciouss of the dissatisfaction chooses freely not to put an end to the situation and keep going. Where acceptance takes place, choice is made freely and the absurd man emerges and becomes the master of his own. The meaning of a universe without a master lies here. Where there is an absence of control by the master, there man becomes free. Is is already concluded that, in a universe where man is free, there exists no master. Without a master how man's experiences of world would change is another issue that has to be concluded. First of all to find the answer, one has to know the experience of the world that man had in a universe with a master. The control of the master over man's decisions, would stop him from behaving the way he wanted beacuse this way might be against the universal laws. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example take crime again. If there is no universal law about crime than, everyone would be able to commit it whenever it seems true. This would definetely cause disorder. So, who is going to determine the borders of men's freedom when there is no master? A universe without a master might give a men more freedom, but what would freedom mean if you could be killed tomorrow by someone who believes murder is true? In conclusion, in a universe with a master, man lives according to universal laws which might be an obstacle for him to achieve his desires. On the other hand, when there is no master in the universe, there is no one to control individual actions. Man is more free in a universe like that. If a man is more free, than he could decide his actions according to his own free will. The way that man choose to go, would be determined by him. Thus, the action will be his. He would be now responsible for his actions. B. AK´┐ŻAY 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Deconstructing O'Connor's "A Good Man Is Hard to Find".

    With no desire to go to Florida as well as the burning desire to visit east Tennessee, the grandmother in disguise of a good-hearted person refers to the newspaper article about the escaping Misfit and exclaims to her son Bailey, "I wouldn't take my children in any direction with a criminal like that aloose in it".

  2. Unless we assume that everyone is free to make moral choices, we have no ...

    As Schopenhaur says, 'A man can surely do what he wills but he cannot determine what he wills.' Clearly, if one is no more than a product of the environment, then one is only free to act within the reason of one's mind.

  1. What do you find particularly horrifying about the world, which E.M. Forster creates?

    feed us and clothes us and houses us... Machine is enemies of superstitious... men spent their strength praying their Book ..." Forster compares the Machine to a 'god' by the use of repetition of Vashti's prayer "O Machine". It suggests that Vashti worships the Machine and it indicates the Machine's power over Vashti, like that of a God, which is a shocking image to us.

  2. The Irenaean theodicy - Questioning God.

    This is the Irenaean aspect of his thought, as like Irenaeus, Hick believes that humans are imperfect and immature creatures who have the responsibility to find what is required to respond to God'' love. Hick talks of creation happening in two stages: 1.

  1. How does Paul change his speeches according to his audience?

    as the inevitable sequel to Gods dealings with people in ancient days." - G. E Wright. This all takes place in a synagogue where all the people there would understand what he was saying beacduse they would know the scriptures.

  2. Asses Sartre's COntribution Toward the philosophy of freedom

    The idea of a final cause would support the belief in God as an administrative being in assigning of roles particularly those of humans, as oppose to tables. If a final cause does exist then it would imply that as humans we are each individually created in order to fulfil

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work